Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34
  1. #1
    ... iamgine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    18,093

    Default Why is going small > going big?

    It seems the notion was when the other team goes small ball, the opponent need to match it. But why does the opponent not go the other way; going big?

    i.e when GSW plays Draymond Green at center, why not counter with...say playing Mason Plumlee and Brook Lopez together.

  2. #2
    The Deciders Im so nba'd out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    It’s our league now…
    Posts
    8,474

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    Quote Originally Posted by iamgine
    It seems the notion was when the other team goes small ball, the opponent need to match it. But why does the opponent not go the other way; going big?

    i.e when GSW plays Draymond Green at center, why not counter with...say playing Mason Plumlee and Brook Lopez together.
    Mason plumlee wont score on whoever is guarding him draymon would.if we had more skilled big men in the league they would go big but we dont.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    9,209

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    LeBron was the only player to successfully implement small ball

    No one else ever won a championship with small ball.

  4. #4
    XXL Im Still Ballin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    23,713

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    I'm not sure if you can make that statement but if one things for sure players are a lot better shooters today than in previous eras

  5. #5
    NBA Legend coin24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Tiny Hateraids Head
    Posts
    17,077

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    Quote Originally Posted by dubeta
    LeBron has small balls

    No one else ever was an alpha with small balls.


  6. #6
    NBA Legend CavaliersFTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,645

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    Quote Originally Posted by dubeta
    LeBron was the only player to successfully implement small ball

    No one else ever won a championship with small ball.
    Rick Barry.

  7. #7
    NBA Legend CavaliersFTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,645

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    Quote Originally Posted by iamgine
    It seems the notion was when the other team goes small ball, the opponent need to match it. But why does the opponent not go the other way; going big?

    i.e when GSW plays Draymond Green at center, why not counter with...say playing Mason Plumlee and Brook Lopez together.
    Teams do do big line ups, when they have the option.

    This is an old example, but I just highlighted the game for my YT channel so it's fresh in my mind - in 1963 G6 Finals one stretch of the game was played with 6-11 Wiley at center and 6-11 Ellis at forward (not normal, normally they used 6-9 LaRusso at that spot) and they slid LaRusso to the "small" forward spot and put Elgin Baylor, normally the Lakers small forward, as a guard along with Jerry West to give Baylor, who had a hot hand, a chance to hit from outside and to offer him so relief crashing boards against Bill Russell and Satch Sanders. It actually worked they went on a big run that Boston had to figure out a new plan to counter.

    I think any change in lineup, whether going big or small, can be effective in throwing a wrench in the other teams defensive strategy. Whether a coach decides to go big or small I don't know, maybe an attempt to exploit match ups but I don't think there's a science too it. I think most teams have to go "small" more often than "big" because they often probably regularly field a "big" line up and don't have much/any flexibility to go any bigger. The easier direction to go is probably smaller.

  8. #8
    Flat Earth Era Nets fan 93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    9,269

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    Quote Originally Posted by Im so nba'd out
    Mason plumlee wont score on whoever is guarding him draymon would.if we had more skilled big men in the league they would go big but we dont.
    This

  9. #9
    College superstar AintNoSunshine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,710

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    Because bigs today can't play for sht, the only thing they're good for is to get a rebound and hand it over to the guards.

  10. #10
    ISH's Negro Historian L.Kizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX -
    Posts
    40,972

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    Because it's a week era for bigs. Wouldn't happen to the 90s Knicks.

  11. #11
    Decent playground baller
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    399

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    Quote Originally Posted by coin24

  12. #12
    Out here Pushxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Cape Cod, MA
    Posts
    5,521

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    Because rules favor perimeter play.

    Too many things down-low are offensive fouls. Plus ballhandlers are able to dismiss defenders more easily lately with their off-arm so driving and kicking is even more-so one of the best plays in basketball.

  13. #13
    Curry fam navy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    15,095

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    Quote Originally Posted by iamgine
    It seems the notion was when the other team goes small ball, the opponent need to match it. But why does the opponent not go the other way; going big?

    i.e when GSW plays Draymond Green at center, why not counter with...say playing Mason Plumlee and Brook Lopez together.

    Because your gonna have your bigs guarding the perimeter in which lots of threes will be shot . Most teams dont have good enough inside presence scorers to match small ball with big lineups.

  14. #14
    The Beast In Me T_L_P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,664

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    Going small is pretty overrated imo, even in today's perimeter-oriented game.

    Teams are still better off when they roll with two bigs.

  15. #15
    College superstar keep-itreal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,716

    Default Re: Why is going small > going big?

    That's because most centers and power forwards today are offensively inept.

    I don't understand how these atheletic seven footers can play their whole career is still not know how to post up. What do they even do in practice???

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •