Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 41 of 41
  1. #31
    NBA Legend Hey Yo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    17,668

    Default Re: Iverson, Kobe and Lebron- FG% Arguments That are Inconsistent

    Originally Posted by 34-24 Footwork
    Lebron had one of the greatest Finals ever shooting 39%
    (45MPG/ 35.8PPG/4TO)

    In the middle of his prime with single coverage.
    12 seasons and 43,330 minutes played, is considered being in the middle of a players prime??? That's not even including his 3 Olympics and 2 FIBA appearance minutes.

  2. #32
    big time kobe stan JT123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Kobeville
    Posts
    6,993

    Default Re: Iverson, Kobe and Lebron- FG% Arguments That are Inconsistent

    Quote Originally Posted by Hey Yo
    12 seasons and 43,330 minutes played, is considered being in the middle of a players prime??? That's not even including his 3 Olympics and 2 FIBA appearance minutes.
    Ignore OP, he's just another Kobetard alt. Who else would compare an entire season to a 6 game sample size?

  3. #33
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,921

    Default Re: Iverson, Kobe and Lebron- FG% Arguments That are Inconsistent

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan

    When your supposed "power forward" takes on those responsibilities of your guard, while not giving (other things) worthy of a power forward... This is where you can officially label your "power forward" as giving you "empty stats".
    I see exactly what you're saying here - Lebron's plays PG, but still starts at forward - [COLOR="Navy"]essentially, all of Lebron's teams have 2 point guards[/COLOR] - Lebron, and the actual PG (Mo Williams, Kyrie, Chalmers).

    Incidentally, PG's typically score by themselves without being assisted by another player - compared to all the other positions, PG's have abnormally low assisted rates.. Accordingly, Lebron's presence as a 2nd point guard in the starting lineup reduces the assist/playmaking capacity of the team, since there is now a 2nd player that teammates don't get to assist very often.. And obviously, teammates are more restricted from playmaking on Lebron's teams because between Lebron and the actual PG, they hog all the playmaking responsibilities.

    Considering Lebron's teams have TWO guys (PG's) that monopolize/hog the playmaking duties while also being low-assisted players, it's no surprise that the APG and assist % of Lebron's teammates goes down alongside Lebron, which results in all of Lebron's teams having very low assist frequency.

    Ultimately, the monopolization/hogging of playmaking duties by the 2 point guards, prevents Lebron's teams from running equal-opportunity offenses where all 5 teammates share in the playmaking responsibilities like the Spurs, Warriors, or 90's Bulls.. Since Lebron prevents his teams from playing the best brand of basketball, equal or less-talented opponents pull upsets by playing a better brand of basketball (2009, 2011, 2014).

  4. #34
    Very good NBA starter
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,522

    Default Re: Iverson, Kobe and Lebron- FG% Arguments That are Inconsistent

    meh
    Last edited by Magic 32; 09-27-2015 at 02:52 PM.

  5. #35
    Lebron fan dh144498's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    2,030

    Default Re: Iverson, Kobe and Lebron- FG% Arguments That are Inconsistent

    jesus.... Budaiii is melting down so hard.... don't shoot up your high school tomorrow, crazy white boy.

  6. #36
    RIP P Young X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,692

    Default Re: Iverson, Kobe and Lebron- FG% Arguments That are Inconsistent

    FG% is outdated anyway. Doesn't account for the extra points on 3pt shots. eFG% is much better. Going 3/8 with 3 threes made is better than going 4/8 with no threes made but FG% won't tell you that.

  7. #37
    Lebron fan dh144498's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    2,030

    Default Re: Iverson, Kobe and Lebron- FG% Arguments That are Inconsistent

    Quote Originally Posted by Young X
    FG% is outdated anyway. Doesn't account for the extra points on 3pt shots. eFG% is much better. Going 3/8 with 3 threes made is better than going 4/8 with no threes made but FG% won't tell you that.
    not necessarily, what if that extra miss also led to a rebound that led to a fast break?

  8. #38
    RIP P Young X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,692

    Default Re: Iverson, Kobe and Lebron- FG% Arguments That are Inconsistent

    Quote Originally Posted by dh144498
    not necessarily, what if that extra miss also led to a rebound that led to a fast break?
    True. I should've said "more efficient" instead of "better".

  9. #39
    Verticle? plowking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    We goin' Sizzler
    Posts
    27,739

    Default Re: Iverson, Kobe and Lebron- FG% Arguments That are Inconsistent

    Since when does 39.8% get rounded down to 39% OP?

    Seems to be something that Bron haters really want to stick despite it not being true.

  10. #40
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    5,418

    Default Re: Iverson, Kobe and Lebron- FG% Arguments That are Inconsistent

    Lebron shot 40% 36 points in the 2015 finals

    MJ shot 41% 27 points in the 1996 finals

    - MJ had the #1 ranked supporting cast of all time in 1996, who were all healthy during the finals
    -Lebron's supporting cast in the finals was ranked in the bottom 5 worst supporting casts of all time, along with his 2014 and 2007 finals teams.
    -In 1996, the 3 point line was actually closer in compared to today

  11. #41
    NBA Legend Hey Yo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    17,668

    Default Re: Iverson, Kobe and Lebron- FG% Arguments That are Inconsistent

    Quote Originally Posted by GIF REACTION
    Lebron shot 40% 36 points in the 2015 finals

    MJ shot 41% 27 points in the 1996 finals

    - MJ had the #1 ranked supporting cast of all time in 1996, who were all healthy during the finals
    -Lebron's supporting cast in the finals was ranked in the bottom 5 worst supporting casts of all time, along with his 2014 and 2007 finals teams.
    -In 1996, the 3 point line was actually closer in compared to today
    Can't front on that ^^^

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •