-
ISH MVP Sponsor
If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
Playoff Average:
2001: 29.4 ppg, 7.3 rpg, 6.1 apg, 1.6 spg
2003: 32.1 ppg, 5.1 rpg, 5.2 apg, 1.2 spg
2008: 30.1 ppg, 5.7 rpg, 5.6 apg, 1.7 spg
2009: 30.2 ppg, 5.3 rpg, 5.5 apg, 1.7 spg
2010: 29.2 ppg, 6.0 rpg, 5.5 apg, 1.3 spg
Pretty nice if you don't factor efficiency and defense, and consistency year to year in playoffs.
-
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
lol dont ever post again..... everrrr
-
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
Originally Posted by Derivative
Playoff Average:
2001: 29.4 ppg, 7.3 rpg, 6.1 apg, 1.6 spg
2003: 32.1 ppg, 5.1 rpg, 5.2 apg, 1.2 spg
2008: 30.1 ppg, 5.7 rpg, 5.6 apg, 1.7 spg
2009: 30.2 ppg, 5.3 rpg, 5.5 apg, 1.7 spg
2010: 29.2 ppg, 6.0 rpg, 5.5 apg, 1.3 spg
Pretty nice if you don't factor efficiency and defense, and consistency year to year in playoffs.
Whats more impressive is that he knows and everyone else does that when he shoots less the team is more likely to win. But you can see his dedication in disregarding whats best for his team and just focusing on trying to copy michael jordan with really high ppg averages.
Copybe
-
Playoff Rondo
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
If you ignore OP's thirst for dick, he's actually not a f@ggot.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
if you ignore repeated refusal to have sex, your name is Kobe
-
NBA All-star
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
Originally Posted by Derivative
Playoff Average:
2001: 29.4 ppg, 7.3 rpg, 6.1 apg, 1.6 spg
2003: 32.1 ppg, 5.1 rpg, 5.2 apg, 1.2 spg
2008: 30.1 ppg, 5.7 rpg, 5.6 apg, 1.7 spg
2009: 30.2 ppg, 5.3 rpg, 5.5 apg, 1.7 spg
2010: 29.2 ppg, 6.0 rpg, 5.5 apg, 1.3 spg
Pretty nice if you don't factor efficiency and defense, and consistency year to year in playoffs.
Funny thing is, his efficiency was around 56-58 TS% for most of those years along with the fact that he played better defense in the playoffs. For reference, that's around where Lebron was at for the past 3 finals runs.
Since your other gimmick account was KG5MVP, KG's efficiency was only 51 TS% in his peak season.
-
You're welcome
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
Originally Posted by chazzy
Funny thing is, his efficiency was around 56-58 TS% for most of those years along with the fact that he played better defense in the playoffs. For reference, that's around where Lebron was at for the past 3 finals runs.
Since your other gimmick account was KG5MVP, KG's efficiency was only 51 TS% in his peak season.
3 pters and FT don't count. Nor does playing against efficient defenses. Try to keep up stan.
-
Laker Nation
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
Originally Posted by Yao Ming's Foot
3 pters and FT don't count. Nor does playing against efficient defenses. Try to keep up stan.
-
7-time NBA All-Star
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
Negged.
Rated thread 1 star.
Reported thread to admins.
Reported poster to be banned.
Reported poster to the chief of police.
Printed copy of thread and posted around my neighborhood to scare kids.
-
ISH MVP Sponsor
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
Originally Posted by chazzy
Funny thing is, his efficiency was around 56-58 TS% for most of those years along with the fact that he played better defense in the playoffs. For reference, that's around where Lebron was at for the past 3 finals runs.
Since your other gimmick account was KG5MVP, KG's efficiency was only 51 TS% in his peak season.
Playoffs TS%
2001: 55.5%
2003: 53.1%
2008: 57.7%
2009: 56.4%
2010: 56.7%
Get your facts right.
And right just cherry pick KG's lowest TS% season. Kobe also had a few seasons with 50% TS
-
Laker Nation
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
Originally Posted by Derivative
Playoffs TS%
2001: 55.5%
2003: 53.1%
2008: 57.7%
2009: 56.4%
2010: 56.7%
Get your facts right.
And right just cherry pick KG's lowest TS% season. Kobe also had a few seasons with 50% TS
so chazzy was right, most of those postseasons he had 56-58 TS. He did get his facts right.
-
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
Originally Posted by Derivative
Playoffs TS%
2001: 55.5%
2003: 53.1%
2008: 57.7%
2009: 56.4%
2010: 56.7%
Get your facts right.
And right just cherry pick KG's lowest TS% season. Kobe also had a few seasons with 50% TS
He did get his facts right.
He said Kobe shot 56-58% TS% for most of those seasons.
5 seasons listed.
2001: 55.5% Under 56%
2003: 53.1% Under 56%
2008: 57.7% Between 56-58%
2009: 56.4%Between 56-58%
2010: 56.7% Between 56-58%
3 out of 5. So yes, Kobe did shoot between 56-58% most of those seasons.
I don't see where he got his facts twisted.
-
maimi heat fan sinc'89
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
if u ignore ur post insidehoop is actually pretty good forums
-
sahelanthropus
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
...and if you don't ignore efficiency and defense, he's an all-time great.
-
Kobe Apostle
Re: If you ignore efficiency and defense, Kobe is actually really good
Originally Posted by Derivative
Playoffs TS%
2001: 55.5%
2003: 53.1%
2008: 57.7%
2009: 56.4%
2010: 56.7%
Get your facts right.
And right just cherry pick KG's lowest TS% season. Kobe also had a few seasons with 50% TS
If you round his 55.5% to 56 and his 57.7% to 58, that makes 4/5 between 56-58%.
To compare (playoff TS%):
Hakeem
86: 56.6%
94: 56.8%
95: 56.0%
Shaq
95: 59.5%
00: 55.6%
01: 56.4%
02: 56.9%
Kareem
71: 54.8%
74: 58.3%
80: 61.1%
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|