-
Bay Areaaaaaaaaaaa!
Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
CP3 and the Clippers seem to play better when Griffin isn't on the floor with them. Blake the ball stopper like Carmelo.
-
with God-given ass
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
Didn't the Clippers do the same after Paul was injured last season?
-
Brooklyn
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
-
Curry fam
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
Who's more underrated, Chris Paul or Doc Rivers?
-
Brooklyn
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
Originally Posted by navy
Who's more underrated, Chris Paul or Doc Rivers?
Austin Rivers.
-
College superstar
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
that's because Blake Griffin can't do anything except dunking
-
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
Originally Posted by navy
Who's more underrated, Chris Paul or Doc Rivers?
Donald Sterling
-
RIP P
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
Originally Posted by JimmyMcAdocious
Didn't the Clippers do the same after Paul was injured last season?
Difference is they're beating elite teams this year, they beat nothing but below .500 teams and lost to every good team they faced when CP went out last year.
And no, they're not better without Blake, they have absolutely no chance of doing anything without him in the playoffs. You're never better when you replace a top 10 ish player with Spencer ****ing Hawes.
-
The Deciders
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
-
Induuubitably
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
What the hell are you talking about. They're 5 and 5 over their last 10. You make it seem as though this they're on a tear right now.
-
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
They're not better they are different and this version isn't too bad either..
We'll see more as the sample size grows larger and teams start making adjustments...
it's been what 4 games 5?
edit: 7 games 4-3 without him
Last edited by gts; 02-27-2015 at 11:55 PM.
-
Good college starter
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
Originally Posted by Done_And_Done
What the hell are you talking about. They're 5 and 5 over their last 10. You make it seem as though this they're on a tear right now.
Yeah 5-5 but with these opponents:
Chi, OKC, Hou, Mem, Mem, Sac, Dal, Cle, Tor, SAS
Basically all top playoff teams.
But, no, they aren't better.
Last edited by Darius; 02-27-2015 at 11:56 PM.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
Originally Posted by navy
Who's more underrated, Chris Paul or Doc Rivers?
Wait. Doc Rivers is underrated?
-
70p game: DBook-1 MJ-0
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
Op is right. We will do the Clippers a favor. Suns will trade their two best players in Bledsoe n Markieff for BG
-
Game. Set. Match.
Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?
It has more to do with playing Blake and Jordan at the same time. Without Blake, the Clippers only put one guy on the box, and are able to spread the court. Think about the kind of shots Blake has been taking this season... mostly long jumpers.
Also, offense has never been an issue for the Clippers, and that's mainly what Blake brings to the table. Honestly, this Clippers team would probably struggle more if they lost Jordan, as he's the only guy on the team that's capable of protecting the rim.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|