Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33
  1. #1
    Induuubitably Done_And_Done's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Places
    Posts
    9,273

    Default New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    The trade market isn't looking too fruitful for the former number 1 pick. I'm sure he'll get picked up fairly quickly as a FA though.

    http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nba-ba...202737798.html

  2. #2
    College superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    4,607

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    Quote Originally Posted by Done_And_Done
    The trade market isn't looking too fruitful for the former number 1 pick. I'm sure he'll get picked up fairly quickly as a FA though.

    http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nba-ba...202737798.html
    There is no reason to do this. They would pay him either way. If they needed the roster spot I could see it. But they are only rostering like 7 NBA players as it is.

  3. #3
    Sixers|Eagles|Phillies GOBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Illadelph live 215
    Posts
    44,772

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    Sixers fan here. I laugh, I laugh so hard.

  4. #4
    Please clap. Real Men Wear Green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    28,754

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    How many #1 picks have been waived before age 30 without sustaining a major injury?

  5. #5
    Banned hawkfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Salt Factory
    Posts
    13,042

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    Which poster wants him on his team?

  6. #6
    Knicks all da way imdaman99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    26,448

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    He's horrible and he never even plays. Gave up next year's pick for him If it wasn't for Knicks getting a top 5 draft pick this year, I would have moved to somewhere ISH is blocked.

  7. #7
    Induuubitably Done_And_Done's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Places
    Posts
    9,273

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    Quote Originally Posted by HurricaneKid
    There is no reason to do this. They would pay him either way. If they needed the roster spot I could see it. But they are only rostering like 7 NBA players as it is.
    Perhaps to advance the tank. Although many would argue that keeping Bargniani does just that.

    In retrospect, that trade with the Raptors couldn't look any more one sided. Massai completely pillaged them.

  8. #8
    Induuubitably Done_And_Done's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Places
    Posts
    9,273

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    Quote Originally Posted by Real Men Wear Green
    How many #1 picks have been waived before age 30 without sustaining a major injury?
    I would surmise it's either none or potentially 1

  9. #9
    Banned hawkfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Salt Factory
    Posts
    13,042

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    The Hawks can sign him, the Knicks save a little on salary but a little more on luxury tax.

    And the Hawks get someone who can into our passing-motion-shooting offense.

  10. #10
    An uglier Lamar Doom boozehound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    23,277

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    Quote Originally Posted by HurricaneKid
    There is no reason to do this. They would pay him either way. If they needed the roster spot I could see it. But they are only rostering like 7 NBA players as it is.
    perhaps there is some tax savings, as they can stretch his contract? But, yeah, no real reason for this.

  11. #11
    College superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    4,607

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    Quote Originally Posted by Done_And_Done
    Perhaps to advance the tank. Although many would argue that keeping Bargniani does just that.

    In retrospect, that trade with the Raptors couldn't look any more one sided. Massai completely pillaged them.
    Everyone knew it at the time. Just like the Nets trading the #6 pick (Lillard) for the expensive corpse of Gerald Wallace. There was some pretty awful GMing going on at the time.

  12. #12
    Banned hawkfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Salt Factory
    Posts
    13,042

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    Quote Originally Posted by HurricaneKid
    Everyone knew it at the time. Just like the Nets trading the #6 pick (Lillard) for the expensive corpse of Gerald Wallace. There was some pretty awful GMing going on at the time.
    That trade from the Nets to Boston was worse.

  13. #13
    Induuubitably Done_And_Done's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Places
    Posts
    9,273

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    Quote Originally Posted by hawkfan
    The Hawks can sign him, the Knicks save a little on salary but a little more on luxury tax.

    And the Hawks get someone who can into our passing-motion-shooting offense.
    Yeah I think he'd fit in well with your boys. The added depth couldn't hurt.

  14. #14
    I miss open layups Miss Bella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    869

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    Quote Originally Posted by Real Men Wear Green
    How many #1 picks have been waived before age 30 without sustaining a major injury?
    The Nets waived Brandon Davies last week.

  15. #15
    Great college starter chocolatethunder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,691

    Default Re: New York contemplating waiving Bargs

    Quote Originally Posted by Real Men Wear Green
    How many #1 picks have been waived before age 30 without sustaining a major injury?
    Kandi? He had to be close.

    Kwame was waived at 31 by the Sixers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •