-
Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
http://www.twitter.com/lancearmstron...8392622080?p=v
So true. The American media is too afraid to get into these speculations. They fear that people will lose interest, which means less $$$$.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
-
OG Jason Smith
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
I think it's pretty interesting. It could have happened, but I doubt Lebron has done anything though. Lebron is a once in a decade athlete.
-
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
Originally Posted by RagaZ
LeBron has been an athletic freak since high school. If he had been juicing for that long, we would have known by now.
-
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
LJ recovering from what? He never been injured. and LJ plays in the Olympics who don't play around when it comes to testing
-
Big Sexy
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
Originally Posted by juju151111
LJ recovering from what? He never been injured. and LJ plays in the Olympics who don't play around when it comes to testing
This.
-
Wilt Davis
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
Originally Posted by dzav323
I think it's pretty interesting. It could have happened, but I doubt Lebron has done anything though. Lebron is a once in a decade athlete.
So is Usain Bolt, but he's likely been using. It's safe to assume that the majority of top professional athletes are using and getting away with it. We've seen how it helps those who got caught like Lance, Marion Jones or McGwire.
-
Wilt Davis
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
Originally Posted by juju151111
and LJ plays in the Olympics who don't play around when it comes to testing
LOL if you think the cheaters aren't ahead of Olympic testing. Anyway, Lance proved that you can get away with it for many years in a sport that did a lot of testing.
-
sahelanthropus
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
I don't personally believe he's on something, but any person in league history from Jordan to LeBron wouldn't shock me.
That being said, if it's HGH for recovery in the offseason, I couldn't care less and actually support its use when players are hurt/in the offseason. Pretty silly for it to be banned as of yet since the side effects seem to be unknown (someone correct me if in wrong), but unless there's proof that it negatively impacts players' lives down the line it's completely asinine for it to not be permitted. Just another medical procedure that helps guys heal (and one if the best at doing so).
Hard steroids and other stuff that either directly impacts performance or is detrimental later in their lives? I agree that they should be banned.
-
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
-
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
Originally Posted by fpliii
but unless there's proof that it negatively impacts players' lives down the line it's completely asinine for it to not be permitted. Just another medical procedure that helps guys heal (and one if the best at doing so).
But you force clean athletes to dope if they wants to compete.
Hey kids, If you want to be star player, stick these up your a*s...
-
Serious playground baller
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
These top end athletes have too much on the line to not be using PEDS
too much money, fame, opportunity
Take any athlete and add PEDS and they become a better athlete.
-
sahelanthropus
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
Originally Posted by Magic 32
But you force clean athletes to dope if they wants to compete.
Hey kids, If you want to be star player, stick these up your a*s...
I guess the procedure would have to be performed in a medical setting (maybe only by approval on a case-by-case basis by a league arbitrator). Guys aren't forced to dope, but if it's permitted everyone will have the chance to recover.
It has nothing to do with pressuring kids. If the technology is out there, and there aren't any negative repercussions down the line health-wise, why not allow the best medical science to help guys heal? Other than the possibility of some side effects being discovered eventually, there is no argument against in my mind. Not in the slightest.
-
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
Originally Posted by fpliii
I guess the procedure would have to be performed in a medical setting (maybe only by approval on a case-by-case basis by a league arbitrator). Guys aren't forced to dope, but if it's permitted everyone will have the chance to recover.
It has nothing to do with pressuring kids. If the technology is out there, and there aren't any negative repercussions down the line health-wise, why not allow the best medical science to help guys heal? Other than the possibility of some side effects being discovered eventually, there is no argument against in my mind. Not in the slightest.
So if you don't want your head size to grow, become a lawyer instead.
-
sahelanthropus
Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)
Originally Posted by Magic 32
So if you don't want your head size to grow, become a lawyer instead.
lol
If we're being completely serious here, are there actually proven negative consequences health-wise after use? If not, what separates HGH from other new procedures?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|