So we're just gonna ignore the fact that Michael Jordan was a poor 3pt shooter?

[superduper]

practised or not, jordan simply wasn't a good 3 point shooter. he would be borderline elite in this era.

How do you know this for a fact without seeing Jordan being born into this era with the difference in training/practicing for the strengths of this era?

I hope you answer me because I really want to challenge your logic here.

Do you realize you can't pick up the figurine of the player that Jordan was back then, put it down into this era and say "LOOK, he would be like THIS because that's how he was back THEN!!"

If you don't realize how retarded that sounds then you're hopeless.

[LAmbruh]

practised or not, jordan simply wasn't a good 3 point shooter. he would be borderline elite in this era.

yup


ugly looking 3pt mechanics too

[Psileas]

practised or not, jordan simply wasn't a good 3 point shooter. he would be borderline elite in this era.

"Borderline elite" is supposed to mean something negative or even neutral?

[superduper]

Everyone reading this thread knows who the morons are. Don't need to say anything more or do anything extra to have the truth stand out..

[egokiller]

That moment when the insecurity is so strong for not having watched GOAT MJ, that you come on ISH and start talking about how he would be at shooting 3's in today's NBA.



Another day
Another win

[fsvr54]

Jordan would average 30ppg in todays game on 65% shooting if he just took midrange jumpers and drove the ball.

[LAmbruh]

He was a good dunker no doubt, but he had no modern era range check out his last three years if yall dont believe me

.238
.189
.291

Putting up Giannis shooting numbers yikes even made a solid thread:


http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/sho...=458191&page=3

yup


no range whatsoever


got you bunny turnaround J's from 10 ft though, Defrozan'esque

[superduper]

Geez you guys are straight embarrassing yourselves.

Yikes.

[jstern]

OP...

Do you honestly think Blake Griffin or Lonzo Ball for example - are better 3 point shooters than Michael Jordan when all conditions are equalized?

Different rules present different strategies and opportunities for scoring. This is the no contact era from the perimeter. The NBA has all but banned defense on perimeter players. If you couldn't touch MJ he'd shoot a hell of a lot better than how he shot when he was being raked shoved and pushed by the 1980's Pistons and 1990's Knicks. Do you agree with this?

When I read the title of this thread I couldn't help but think how naive and stupid so many people are.

He takes like 50 three pointers in one season, all probably bailout three pointers, because the game was played so differently, and they think it's an actual indication of his capability as a three point shooter.

[diamenz]

not sure why u people bother replying to op. he's trolling. so the joke is on u.

[Akrazotile]

This forum is at an all time low.

Mods, ban me for life, i do not give a fvck, it'd improve my life hahaha

Bron stans, you are literally the dumbest of the dumb, i actually hope you talk this shit IRL so people can put a face to the sheer stupidity, problem is, none of you f@ggots leave the house and only spin this shit to mommy because you have no fvcking friends.

Jesus fvcking christ, the failure level is beyond anything i've ever seen on any forum....

EAT.MY.FVCKING.C0CK

Cheers

melted down to a puddle

[scuzzy]

ITT juicy meltdowns

[And1AllDay]

ITT juicy meltdowns

Facts hurt there feelings I guess. It is true he has a small impact so why be mad about it just accept it

[livinglegend]

not sure why u people bother replying to op. he's trolling. so the joke is on u.

No he is not. It s a fact that Jordan was a mediocre 3pt shooter.
Don't start with the if's.

[Tennis19]

i remember when he was in the 3pt contest. his 5 pts is still the lowest ever. having said that, if he played in this era he would work on this 3 ball and prob be around 34-36% range.