If Scoring is so Important, should this be the Top 10 all time?

[riseagainst]

Huh? Nope, it's about scoring. So I showed playoff scoring leaders.

Durant > Lebron
Iverson > Lebron

Deal with it

dragic getting ethered.

[dr.hee]

Show PER in the finals/playoffs. Let's see the list. Idiot.

No problem

PER leaders playoffs:

1. Michael Jordan 28.60
2. George Mikan 28.51
3. LeBron James 27.70
4. Shaquille O'Neal 26.13
5. Hakeem Olajuwon 25.69
6. Chris Paul 25.04
7. Tim Duncan 24.59
8. Kevin Durant 24.35
9. Charles Barkley 24.18
10. Dirk Nowitzki 24.17

In the playoffs, this guy > Lebron



Numbers don't lie.

Best PER finals performances:

Dwyane Wade 2006 33.8
Tim Duncan 2003 32.0
Michael Jordan 1991 31.5
Shaquille O'Neal 2002 31.4
Shaquille O'Neal 2000 31.1
Michael Jordan 1998 30.8
Tim Duncan 1999 30.7
Dwyane Wade 2011 30.2
Michael Jordan 1997 29.5
Shaquille O'Neal 2001 29.4

So...where's your boyfriend?

Numbers don't lie

You notice Wade in 2011? He was having a historic finals series. 26/7/5 with a 59 eFG% and a PER of 30.2 Could't win it all though since his sidekicks' game regressed just like his hairline. Poor DWade.

Let's see if I'm doing this right, hold on...Jimmies rustled. Rent free. In your head brah. Dat ehter. Owned. Slayed. U mad bro?

Did I do this right?

[riseagainst]

^

ouch.

[GODbe]

The most important method of ranking basketball players is quite easily the eye-test.

Kobe >>>>>>>>>> Everyone in that aspect as well as clutchness, high scoring games, killer instinct etc.

[Marchesk]

It's ok to like Dantley but to say he was more dominant than Shaq is silly. Saying he was more dominant than Duncan is wrong too but Duncan's career is much less defined by peak dominance than Shaq.

I didn't think this thread was serious.

[dannywpt]

Numbers don't lie you idiot.

Moron thinking their opinions and bias matter over facts. MY ALT made a thread with a list of top scorers ACCORDING TO STATS. STFU and deal with it.