Did you know: The Democratic party put American citizens in concentration camps.

[Nick Young]

Did you know that the Democratic party, under the executive leadership of FDR, is responsible for interning tens of thousands of American citizens in concentration camps, simply due to their ancestry?


It was only 75 years ago that the Democrats rounded up all Americans of Japanese descent from their homes and forced them to live in concentration camps in the California desert for years.



The Democrats even forced these interned Americans WHO COMMITTED NO CRIME to work in sweat shops in order to enable the American war effort against Japan-the nation that these interned American's ancestors came from.








This is what Democratic party leadership looks like.

Know what you're voting for.

[Nick Young]

#Neverforget

[Nick Young]

Check out this book if you want to learn more about the disgusting concentration camps created by FDR and the Democrats.

We must never repeat this mistake again.

[NumberSix]

The democrat party's strategy has always been to instigate sectarianism (for lack of a better word). It's never about ideas, but identity. They don't target positions. They target identities. They never strategize "how can we get votes from issue A or issue B voters". It's always "how do we get votes from identity group A or identity group B".

You just saw this with Hillary the way she and her surrogates kept trying to shamelessly imply that Bernie is a sexist or that he only just recently started pretending to care about black people to get votes. This is standard democrat politics. Bernie is trying to have a battle over actual issues but Hillary just wants to battle over who can better consolidate blacks or Hispanics or whatever.

You can see very easily when they talk about the republican primary polls, they discuss who does better with conservative, very conservative, moderate, libertarian, etc... You don't see any of that in the democrat primaries. All they discuss is white, black, Hispanic, young women, older women, etc... There's no discussion of liberal, very liberal, moderate, etc...

Their entire political strategy is to instigate division between identity groups and if need be create or inflame new tensions where there aren't any.

[nathanjizzle]

sick

[Riks]

Did you know that current Republicans are more similar to Democrats from that era than current Democrats?

[Nick Young]

The democrat party's strategy has always been to instigate sectarianism (for lack of a better word). It's never about ideas, but identity. They don't target positions. They target identities. They never strategize "how can we get votes from issue A or issue B voters". It's always "how do we get votes from identity group A or identity group B".

You just saw this with Hillary the way she and her surrogates kept trying to shamelessly imply that Bernie is a sexist or that he only just recently started pretending to care about black people to get votes. This is standard democrat politics. Bernie is trying to have a battle over actual issues but Hillary just wants to battle over who can better consolidate blacks or Hispanics or whatever.

You can see very easily when they talk about the republican primary polls, they discuss who does better with conservative, very conservative, moderate, libertarian, etc... You don't see any of that in the democrat primaries. All they discuss is white, black, Hispanic, young women, older women, etc... There's no discussion of liberal, very liberal, moderate, etc...

Their entire political strategy is to instigate division between identity groups and if need be create or inflame new tensions where there aren't any.

They still remain true to their KKK roots. The Dems are absolutely obsessed with labeling and sorting people in to piles based on their race and religion. When someone doesn't fit in to the pile sorting and goes against the narrative of how Dems think that person should behave and act, the Dems meltdown. They aren't capable of handling a world that isn't based on absolutes and identity politics.

[Nick Young]

Did you know that current Republicans are more similar to Democrats from that era than current Democrats?

So FDR was actually a Republican?

Please explain in your own words when this great switching of ideologies occurred, I wish to learn

[Riks]

So FDR was actually a Republican?

Please explain in your own words when this great switching of ideologies occurred, I wish to learn

The switch was gradual. Lincoln was also Republican, yet you see more Republicans these days that wish for the old times than you see Democrats.

[NumberSix]

The switch was gradual. Lincoln was also Republican, yet you see more Republicans these days that wish for the old times than you see Democrats.

There was no "switch". The democrats have just been very successful scam artists.

Republicans believe that the law should be truly color blind while they democrats believe in strategically not enforcing the law if they can position themselves as the saviour of some identity group.

For example, the republicans believe immigration laws should equally apply to everybody. The democrats want immigration laws to equally apply to everybody EXCEPT Hispanics. If you're Hispanic, the piece of shit democrats will whisper in your ear "the republicans don't REALLY believe in equally applying the law. They just hate Hispanics. You should never vote for them. You should only vote for us."

They intentionally instigate division.

[Nick Young]

The switch was gradual. Lincoln was also Republican, yet you see more Republicans these days that wish for the old times than you see Democrats.

Wow, that's cool to know. Did you know that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and the Civil Rights activists of the 1950s were Republicans?

This is the same party that attempted to stand up against FDR and his unconstitutional internment of American citizens of Japanese descent in concentration camp sweat shops.


When did the switch happen exactly?

[Riks]

Wow, that's cool to know. Did you know that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and the Civil Rights activists of the 1950s were Republicans?

This is the same party that attempted to stand up against FDR and his unconstitutional internment of American citizens of Japanese descent in concentration camp sweat shops.


When did the switch happen exactly?

Apparently you don't understand the concept of gradual since you are still asking when "exactly" and pointing out stuff from the 50s.

[ShackEelOKneel]

Did you know the OP likes spreading old propaganda like it is relevant to today's political parties?

[NumberSix]

Apparently you don't understand the concept of gradual since you are still asking when "exactly" and pointing out stuff from the 50s.

The democrat strategy has always been to divide people and politicize identity. The way they do it has just become more sophisticated than their old "der, non whites and non Protestants are bad" approach.

If the democrat party moved to Israel, they'd employ the exact same strategy. Their entire strategy would be telling all the non Jews "hey, the other party hates you. They only like Jews. You can't trust them. You should never vote for them. You should only vote for us".

If the democrat party moved to Syria, their strategy would be to tell all the Shia, Christians and Kurds "the other party hates you. They only like Sunni Arabs. You should never vote for them."

If the democrat party moved to Northern Ireland, their entire strategy would be telling Catholics "the other party hates you. They only represent Protestants. You can't trust them. You should only vote for us."


It's the lowest of the low in politics. It's disgusting and it's what they've always done. And you better believe if some day the demographics shift, they'll adjust and use the same strategy. If for some reason there was mass immigration from eastern Europe because the EU went to hell or something and the US population shifted to be more right wing white Christian... You better believe the democrat party will adjust to the new demographics and start pandering, instigating and dividing accordingly.

[Dresta]

Did you know the OP likes spreading old propaganda like it is relevant to today's political parties?

Well, it is considering many American liberals view themselves as inheritors to FDR, at the same time as calling Trump a fascist and racist. Not only that, but they are using the guilt by association tactics to brand him as a racist. Can't do that and not expect history to bite you in the ass (or maybe you can, considering how little history most people know). Because Mussolini and the Italian fascists were huuuge fans of FDR an his New Deals, so much so that when they realised their glowing admiration was being used against him in America, his press office put out the following statement:

"It is not to be emphasized that Roosevelt