Karl Malone vs Kevin Garnett

[wang4three]

Garnett at his prime was better.

[BDiesel324]

Garnett at his prime was better.

Barkley at his prime was better too. That doesn't make either of them greater than Malone.

[Round Mound]

Barkley at his prime was better too. That doesn't make either of them greater than Malone.

Barkley was better period. Its not primes vs primes. Barkley`s injuries was the thing that prevented him to maintain himself at a good-great level like of that Malone was capable off.

Malone was better than Garnett. He actually developed a Post Game

[Jacks3]

I'd take Garnett. His defensive impact completely destroys Malone's. Better peak, too.

[ginobli2311]

I'd take Garnett. His defensive impact completely destroys Malone's. Better peak, too.

totally agree. even though i feel like malone is now getting a little under rated....KG' defensive impact goes way too unappreciated on here. he's probably one of the ten best two way players of all time. he could dominate a game on both ends in his prime. not more than a handful of players in nba history good anchor a great defense and give you 30 and 15 at times in the playoffs.

i have duncan as the best pf of all time followed a lot closer by KG than most. i think its clearly duncan as the best....but KG was better than most give him credit for imo.

my rankings:

1. duncan
2. kg
3. malone
4. barkley

[Yung D-Will]

Barkley was better period. Its not primes vs primes. Barkley`s injuries was the thing that prevented him to maintain himself at a good-great level like of that Malone was capable off.

Malone was better than Garnett. He actually developed a Post Game

You really need to relax.