Is Curry even better offensively than Iverson?

[StrongLurk]

AI is a better scorer. Curry a better shooter.

No...Curry is a better shooter and scorer.

[StrongLurk]

Curry led the league in Free Throw shooting AND layup percentage...on top of being the best 3 point shooter ever BY FAR.

Also shot over 40 percent from midrange.

Damn, I love Iverson too but he gets crazy overrated. Iverson couldn't touch Curry this year.

Iverson shoots the ball 25+ times and players 10 more minutes a game than Curry

[Tarik One]

How would the finals have played out if A.I. played for Golden State instead of Curry?

[StrongLurk]

How would the finals have played out if A.I. played for Golden State instead of Curry?

He would have killed The Warriors chemistry by chucking them out of games.

Iverson was legendary in one Finals game...and absolute garbage in the other 4.

[Just2McFly]

AI: 31 PPG on 26 shots a game
Curry: 30 PPG on 20 shots a game

Yeah...it's not close. Sorry man.

LMAO at that being how we compare scorers. The era AI was in, getting 31 points a game in the ugly eastern conference where everyone was playing Riley Knicks grind it out style was impressive as hell.

Plus curry average is like 22 ppg for his career, that aint all time just yet.

You saying it's not close because he had one 30 point season is just retarded.

[Dro]

Steph is a better shooter. Way better. That's about it, he scores points in fewer minutes because he's shooting a ton of 3s which is the way the game is played now. So Steph can lead the league in layup% but Iverson wouldn't raise his fg% in this era with wide open lanes and he doesn't have to shoot a bunch of tear drops over big men like Ewing, Zo, and Shaq? LOL?

[Just2McFly]

Steph is a better shooter. Way better. That's about it, he scores points in fewer minutes because he's shooting a ton of 3s which is the way the game is played now. So Steph can lead the league in layup% but Iverson wouldn't raise his fg% in this era with wide open lanes and he doesn't have to shoot a bunch of tear drops over big men like Ewing, Zo, and Shaq? LOL?

To add on to your big man list; Ben Wallace, Jermaine O'neal, Theo Ratliff, Tim Duncan, etc...

Like the paint wasn't that open back in the day.

[atljonesbro]

Op... Are you retarded? Iverson isn't near as good offensively as Curry. He's just swaggier

[riseagainst]

judging from these finals, nope. Iverson is a smarter player. Curry flat out played like a dummy this series.

[game3524]

How would the finals have played out if A.I. played for Golden State instead of Curry?

They win.

AI would have worn Kyrie out....he was completely relentless in his prime. He was also clutch as **** and a big game player.

[tpols]

They win.

AI would have worn Kyrie out....he was completely relentless in his prime. He was also clutch as **** and a big game player.

i agree with this if AI could buy into the warriors offense .. which he should be good at given his quickness off ball. but yea, iverson is one of those guys thats unpunkable.. dumb, but cannot be punked. he would of eaten bran flakes for breakfast.. and at least go down swinging.

[AirBonner]

Iverson was on some truly crappy teams and gets underrated as hell. Can you imagine Iverson on this stacked warriors team? Iverson is offensively better period. Curry is the better shooter.

[Smoke117]

lol...easily. Anyone who thinks differently is a ****ing moron...AI is the most overrated scorer the league has ever seen...apparently making a few pretty plays makes 30 points on 27 shots look good.

[TomCat]

You think AI would finish a game with like 11 points in the finals?

[AirBonner]

You think AI would finish a game with like 11 points in the finals?

This. and AI "wouldn't be bored"