Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 60
  1. #31
    RIP P Young X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,692

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    Quote Originally Posted by oarabbus
    People really think the following players would have problems in the 90s?

    -Dwight
    -Wade
    -Griffin
    -Love
    -Paul George
    -Carmelo
    -Prime CP3
    -Prime Amar'e Stoudemire
    -Westbrook
    -Matrix
    -The Brow
    None of those players with the exception of maybe KD would be top 5 in 1990. Most of them wouldn't even be top 10 or 15.

  2. #32
    Form is temporary deja vu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    2,152

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    Only LeBron and Durant would be top 10 players in the 90s.

  3. #33
    Top 3 Family LongLiveTheKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,776

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    Players from the 90s get so overrated.

  4. #34
    NBA Superstar Hamtaro CP3KDKG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Godzirra
    Posts
    14,334

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    The 2010s is on the 60s level

    80s, 90s and 00s>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

  5. #35
    3-time NBA All-Star kurple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,980

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    Quote Originally Posted by Milbuck
    Clearly better than anyone aside from Lebron/Durant? In their primes..

    90-99: MJ, Shaq, Hakeem, Robinson, Ewing, Barkley, Malone

    00-09: Shaq, Kobe, Duncan, KG, Dirk, T-Mac, Wade
    where is iverson?

  6. #36
    Death Before Dishonor Bigsmoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    CHICAGO
    Posts
    17,648

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    If ISH still alive in 2030, we will be here like "2010's was the golden era"

  7. #37
    Reign of Error BoutPractice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,295

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    Not as "weak" as you'd think.

    Greatness is often confirmed by:
    - a remarkable prime
    - remarkable longevity (all-star selections, MVP votes, etc. over a long period)

    After Durant and LeBron, you have CP3, an all-time great point guard whose prime isn't over (if he ever adds a championship to his resume people other than statheads will start arguing if he's the second/third best PG ever). Dwight is a first ballot HOFer and his prime hasn't ended. Tony Parker is another all-time great rarely mentioned in lists who may still add significantly to his resume, and will become revered once he retires. Same with Carmelo. Wade and especially Bosh aren't completely done and may experience an individual resurgence.

    But most importantly, we haven't yet seen the prime and longevity of Kevin Love, Russell Westbrook, Blake Griffin, James Harden, Anthony Davis, Paul George, Stephen Curry, Kyrie Irving, John Wall etc.... Who is going to put together an MVP caliber season? Who is going to outlast them all and change the narrative around them?

    Add to that the 2014 draft (they're nothing right now but people will use them in the future to say so and so played against Wiggins/Parker/Embiid/whoever), and the stars that may erupt next year, and the NBA is in great shape. As it is most of the time.

    Let's not forget that back in the early 00s, few were predicting that Dirk and KG would end up with a case for top 20 in the history of the game (instead they would have talked about TMac, Vince Carter, and Allen Iverson). Their historical greatness made itself obvious with time... DWade was in no one's radar as a future HOFer when he was first drafted, as all eyes were on LeBron and Melo. And Kevin Durant himself was typecast as a future "high scoring SF whose teams don't go anywhere" rather than a potential future multiple champion. That was why people preferred Oden... they thought Oden was a "winner" versus Durant the "scorer".

  8. #38
    MH! aj1987's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    22,584

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    Quote Originally Posted by Young X
    None of those players with the exception of maybe KD would be top 5 in 1990. Most of them wouldn't even be top 10 or 15.

  9. #39
    The Fam Trollsmasher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    9,730

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    I agree. It was much easier for single players to be stars in the '90s than it is today.

    That's why '90s are the weakest era since '50. Current players should be ranked higher based on this fact.

  10. #40
    I usually hit open layups
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    170

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trollsmasher
    I agree. It was much easier for single players to be stars in the '90s than it is today.

    That's why '90s are the weakest era since '50. Current players should be ranked higher based on this fact.
    90s is a weak era?

    Michael Jordan - Charles Barkley - Hakeem Olajuwon - David Robinson - Patrick Ewing - Karl Malone - John Stockton - Clyde Drexler - Scottie Pippen - Grant Hill - Gary Payton - Shawn Kemp - Dennis Rodman - Penny Hardaway - Tim Hardaway - Alonzo Mourning - Glen Rice - Chris Mullin - Mitch Richmond - Reggie Miller - Dikembe Mutombo - etc.

    Yeah, so weak.

    Mid-to-Late 90s Marked Beginnings Of: Tim Duncan - Kevin Garnett - Allen Iverson - Kobe Bryant - Tracy McGrady -Ray Allen - Steve Nash - Jason Kidd - etc.

    Were you one of those people upset that the Bulls three-peated twice? They created a dynasty and they had a great rivalry with the Knicks along the way.

    The 90s are one of the heights of basketball in terms of talent, captivating postseason play and fan interest. You don't have to like anyone from that era, but to call them "weak" is just ignorant. The 80s and 90s was the undisputed peak of NBA basketball and 90s produced some of the best players of all-time in their prime, including the GOAT, at each position.
    Last edited by CelticBalla32; 08-20-2014 at 12:02 PM.

  11. #41
    YMCA Scrub ZMonkey11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,034

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    Quote Originally Posted by BoutPractice
    Not as "weak" as you'd think.

    Greatness is often confirmed by:
    - a remarkable prime
    - remarkable longevity (all-star selections, MVP votes, etc. over a long period)

    After Durant and LeBron, you have CP3, an all-time great point guard whose prime isn't over (if he ever adds a championship to his resume people other than statheads will start arguing if he's the second/third best PG ever). Dwight is a first ballot HOFer and his prime hasn't ended. Tony Parker is another all-time great rarely mentioned in lists who may still add significantly to his resume, and will become revered once he retires. Same with Carmelo. Wade and especially Bosh aren't completely done and may experience an individual resurgence.

    But most importantly, we haven't yet seen the prime and longevity of Kevin Love, Russell Westbrook, Blake Griffin, James Harden, Anthony Davis, Paul George, Stephen Curry, Kyrie Irving, John Wall etc.... Who is going to put together an MVP caliber season? Who is going to outlast them all and change the narrative around them?

    Add to that the 2014 draft (they're nothing right now but people will use them in the future to say so and so played against Wiggins/Parker/Embiid/whoever), and the stars that may erupt next year, and the NBA is in great shape. As it is most of the time.

    Let's not forget that back in the early 00s, few were predicting that Dirk and KG would end up with a case for top 20 in the history of the game (instead they would have talked about TMac, Vince Carter, and Allen Iverson). Their historical greatness made itself obvious with time... DWade was in no one's radar as a future HOFer when he was first drafted, as all eyes were on LeBron and Melo. And Kevin Durant himself was typecast as a future "high scoring SF whose teams don't go anywhere" rather than a potential future multiple champion. That was why people preferred Oden... they thought Oden was a "winner" versus Durant the "scorer".
    this was most excellent

  12. #42
    Dunking on everybody in the park
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    657

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    The 08-09 kobe, lebron and wade would still be the top 3 players today.

  13. #43
    for your health Prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,739

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    Quote Originally Posted by Straight_Ballin
    Seeing as how Durant/LeBron are inferior to at least 5 players from 90-99 and 00-09, a list of 3 that is clearly ahead of today's watered down joke of a league isn't even needed.

    Good gimick attempt tho.


    Jordan and Shaq are the only ones who, at their peaks were without a doubt superior to both LeBron and Durant. McGrady, Olajuwon, Duncan, Kobe, Robinson... all of these guys at their best would be on the level with LBJ and KD but absolutely not "superior".

  14. #44
    College superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,331

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    Quote Originally Posted by moe94
    List the players from 90-99 and 00-09 that would be top 3 players today, at minimum. That is to say that they're CLEARLY ahead of all players not named Durant/LeBron as those two are seen to be in a tier alone.

    I know an absolute prime Vin Baker would at least be better than Serge Ibaka.

  15. #45
    The Fam Trollsmasher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    9,730

    Default Re: How "weak" is this era in terms of superstars?

    Quote Originally Posted by CelticBalla32
    90s is a weak era?

    Michael Jordan - Charles Barkley - Hakeem Olajuwon - David Robinson - Patrick Ewing - Karl Malone - John Stockton - Clyde Drexler - Scottie Pippen - Grant Hill - Gary Payton - Shawn Kemp - Dennis Rodman - Penny Hardaway - Tim Hardaway - Alonzo Mourning - Glen Rice - Chris Mullin - Mitch Richmond - Reggie Miller - Dikembe Mutombo - etc.

    Yeah, so weak.

    Mid-to-Late 90s Marked Beginnings Of: Tim Duncan - Kevin Garnett - Allen Iverson - Kobe Bryant - Tracy McGrady -Ray Allen - Steve Nash - Jason Kidd - etc.

    Were you one of those people upset that the Bulls three-peated twice? They created a dynasty and they had a great rivalry with the Knicks along the way.

    The 90s are one of the heights of basketball in terms of talent, captivating postseason play and fan interest. You don't have to like anyone from that era, but to call them "weak" is just ignorant. The 80s and 90s was the undisputed peak of NBA basketball and 90s produced some of the best players of all-time in their prime, including the GOAT, at each position.
    Those players simply exposed the star-friendly enviroment created by Stern for Jordan. Half of them would be forgettable if they played today. You have to be a real star today to stick out, not a manufactured '90s boy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •