-
Local High School Star
Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
Since 2004 to 2014.
No L. James in the league. Same rosters for the cavs and everybody else.
be honest here.
IMO: 0 rings.
-
n/a
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
depends where he goes in 2010
-
Local High School Star
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
-
XXL
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
You'd be right
Those cavs teams didn't have nearly enough talent
-
Local High School Star
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
Originally Posted by Im Still Ballin
You'd be right
Those cavs teams didn't have nearly enough talent
so.... james played 4 seasons with a talented team (4 finals)
-
Tell your friends
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6...
-
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
Originally Posted by Alamо
not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6...
This. The GOAT with a 55 point dropping all-star in Mo Williams?! It's over
Plus he gonna get old ass Shaq at some point
EDIT: Also former all-star Antawn Jamison, it won't even be fair
-
Great college starter
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
The same as he won in the 80s before he got the most stacked roster
-
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
-
Seething...
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
Originally Posted by Quickening
The same as he won in the 80s before he got the most stacked roster
MJ's rosters weren't stacked, they were top heavy. MJ/Pip and Grant/Rodman. Everyone else were role players. A stacked team is a team like the 2000 Blazers or the 2002 Kings or this year's Warriors. There is a difference.
-
XXL
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
Originally Posted by ClipperRevival
MJ's rosters weren't stacked, they were top heavy. MJ/Pip and Grant/Rodman. Everyone else were role players. A stacked team is a team like the 2000 Blazers or the 2002 Kings or this year's Warriors. There is a difference.
55 wins without Jordan
Stacked
-
Dunking on everybody in the park
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
If LeBron could get those teams 60 win seasons, I think Jordan could get them to championships. Not sure how many, and even harder to tell in the 2010s because of the Cavs not blowing things up if Jordan stayed.
-
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
Originally Posted by Quickening
The same as he won in the 80s before he got the most stacked roster
That never happened. Roster was hardly stacked.
.
-
Seething...
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
Originally Posted by Im Still Ballin
55 wins without Jordan
Stacked
No, they weren't stacked. They were star heavy in Pippen and Grant. Kukoc was pretty solid and borderline star material. But everyone else were role players like Cartwright, Paxson, Armstrong, etc.
-
Laker Nation
Re: Honesltly, put Jordan in the Cavs instead of Lebron James in 2004, how many rings?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|