-
Seething...
Re: 1995-96 Bulls went 87-13 (.870), best case scenario for GSW is 89-14 (.864)
People talk about GSW's athleticism/length but the 1996 Bulls also had that. Consider:
PG - Harper 6'6"
SG - Jordan 6'6"
SF - Pippen 6'8"
PF - Rodman 6'8"
Kukoc 6'10" long, agile coming off the bench. This Bulls team could suffocate opponents in stretches and shrink the court on the perimeter.
-
GOAT
Re: 1995-96 Bulls went 87-13 (.870), best case scenario for GSW is 89-14 (.864)
Originally Posted by ClipperRevival
People talk about GSW's athleticism/length but the 1996 Bulls also had that. Consider:
PG - Harper 6'6"
SG - Jordan 6'6"
SF - Pippen 6'8"
PF - Rodman 6'8"
Kukoc 6'10" long, agile coming off the bench. This Bulls team could suffocate opponents in stretches and shrink the court on the perimeter.
Longley 7'2"
Wennington 7'0"
Caffey 6'8"
Bulls had plenty of big bodies to throw at teams.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
-
National High School Star
-
Long Live The Process
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: 1995-96 Bulls went 87-13 (.870), best case scenario for GSW is 89-14 (.864)
Originally Posted by fourkicks44
hes injured
it happens
get over it
-
Long Live The Process
Re: 1995-96 Bulls went 87-13 (.870), best case scenario for GSW is 89-14 (.864)
Originally Posted by warriorfan
hes injured
it happens
get over it
They are up 2-1 in the NBA finals with home court advantage!
And you're giving up?
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 1995-96 Bulls went 87-13 (.870), best case scenario for GSW is 89-14 (.864)
Originally Posted by fourkicks44
I think you make too much out of the three point line. Was not a major factor in the 96 Bulls' winningness, and sure as hell wasn't the reason they beat Seattle in the Finals.
GSW would not be taking advantage of the shortened 3 pt line because of Chicago's length and quickness on defense. They'd be shooting from normal distance and out because that's where they'd get enough space to shoot.
And besides, Chicago would have no trouble exposing mismatches against GSW. They were an exceptionally smart team. They'd own the paint and the rebounds.
Last edited by Da_Realist; 06-09-2016 at 06:50 AM.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 1995-96 Bulls went 87-13 (.870), best case scenario for GSW is 89-14 (.864)
Originally Posted by ClipperRevival
People talk about GSW's athleticism/length but the 1996 Bulls also had that. Consider:
PG - Harper 6'6"
SG - Jordan 6'6"
SF - Pippen 6'8"
PF - Rodman 6'8"
Kukoc 6'10" long, agile coming off the bench. This Bulls team could suffocate opponents in stretches and shrink the court on the perimeter.
Not only that, but they actually utilized their size by being great with positioning and being a great rebounding, defensive and post up team. Teams can have size but negate it by standing out near half court waiting on a pass to shoot 3's.
-
Great college starter
Re: 1995-96 Bulls went 87-13 (.870), best case scenario for GSW is 89-14 (.864)
Originally Posted by ClipperRevival
People talk about GSW's athleticism/length but the 1996 Bulls also had that. Consider:
PG - Harper 6'6"
SG - Jordan 6'6"
SF - Pippen 6'8"
PF - Rodman 6'8"
Kukoc 6'10" long, agile coming off the bench. This Bulls team could suffocate opponents in stretches and shrink the court on the perimeter.
Even ..
Harper-Jordan-Pippen-Kukoc-Rodman
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: 1995-96 Bulls went 87-13 (.870), best case scenario for GSW is 89-14 (.864)
Originally Posted by fourkicks44
They are up 2-1 in the NBA finals with home court advantage!
And you're giving up?
He's a Curry stan, doesn't give a shit about GS.
-
By Any Means
Re: 1995-96 Bulls went 87-13 (.870), best case scenario for GSW is 89-14 (.864)
Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers
Warriors faced Durant-Westbrook & LeBron-Irving-Love
Bulls went up against a Shaq & Penny team that was without Horace Grant & a Sonics team who's best player was no where near LeBron's level. The Warriors also played in a tougher conference throughout the season.
Ummm... 96 GP would have Curry crying b .... his one on one defense is so godly
-
Bringer of Light
Re: 1995-96 Bulls went 87-13 (.870), best case scenario for GSW is 89-14 (.864)
eliteballer still an idiot, I see.
-
Local High School Star
Re: 1995-96 Bulls went 87-13 (.870), best case scenario for GSW is 89-14 (.864)
Updated.
Bulls
72-10 Regular Season
15-3 Playoffs
87-13 Overall (.870)
Warriors
73-9 Regular Season
15-7 Playoffs
88-16 Overall (.846)
-
Re: 1995-96 Bulls went 87-13 (.870), best case scenario for GSW is 89-14 (.864)
Originally Posted by Poetry
Updated.
Bulls
72-10 Regular Season
15-3 Playoffs
87-13 Overall (.870)
Warriors
73-9 Regular Season
15-7 Playoffs
88-16 Overall (.846)
Forget the '96 Bulls, I think the '14 Spurs would shit all over this Warriors squad.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|