-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: 2002 Kings vs 2015 Warriors
-
XXL
Re: 2002 Kings vs 2015 Warriors
I still stand by my words
Sacramento nearly beat Prime Shaq and Frobe
Scratch that
They SHOULD have
That's two top 10 all timers on the same team
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: 2002 Kings vs 2015 Warriors
Originally Posted by Im Still Ballin
I still stand by my words
Sacramento nearly beat Prime Shaq and Frobe
Scratch that
They SHOULD have
That's two top 10 all timers on the same team
Warriors
67-15
+10 Point Differential (Highest since '97 Bulls)
MVP Curry
#2 Offense
#1 Defense
Warriors may not be as top heavy as the early 00's Lakers, but you have to admit that Golden State is a more balanced team with better role players.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: 2002 Kings vs 2015 Warriors
How about the '01 Lakers vs '15 Warriors? Who you got, OP? Note: You can't choose both.
Shameless bandwagoner!
-
XXL
Re: 2002 Kings vs 2015 Warriors
Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers
Warriors
67-15
+10 Point Differential (Highest since '97 Bulls)
MVP Curry
#2 Offense
#1 Defense
Warriors may not be as top heavy as the early 00's Lakers, but you have to admit that Golden State is a more balanced team with better role players.
Agreed
The starting 5's feel eerily similar yet still obviously different
I feel like C-Webb is the problem for GSW
4-3 Kings
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: 2002 Kings vs 2015 Warriors
Originally Posted by Im Still Ballin
Agreed
The starting 5's feel eerily similar yet still obviously different
Yes, there are alot of similarities for both teams. Both are deep and balanced, both pass the ball very well, both have top 5/10 players in Curry/Webber. But I like the Warriors because of their defense, Golden State has a handful of players who are considered elite/very good defenders. Sacramento only had one in Christie.
-
XXL
Re: 2002 Kings vs 2015 Warriors
Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers
Yes, there are alot of similarities for both teams. Both are deep and balanced, both pass the ball very well, both have top 5/10 players in Curry/Webber. But I like the Warriors because of their defense, Golden State has a handful of players who are considered elite/very good defenders. Sacramento only had one in Christie.
Bogut is clearly the difference that stands out for me
Both are very skilled passers yet Vlade wasn't the rim protector Andrew is
I can't remember but the Kings were still a top 5 defense that year if I'm not mistaken
-
XXL
Re: 2002 Kings vs 2015 Warriors
Might more be a reflection at the state of offenses during that time more than anything
-
XXL
Re: 2002 Kings vs 2015 Warriors
Which is still surprising because like you said, Christie seems to be the only elite defender on the team
-
Good college starter
Re: 2002 Kings vs 2015 Warriors
Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers
Yes, there are alot of similarities for both teams. Both are deep and balanced, both pass the ball very well, both have top 5/10 players in Curry/Webber. But I like the Warriors because of their defense, Golden State has a handful of players who are considered elite/very good defenders. Sacramento only had one in Christie.
Originally Posted by Im Still Ballin
Which is still surprising because like you said, Christie seems to be the only elite defender on the team
Bobby Jackson and Pollard were considered good, if not great, defenders. It's just they came off the bench, so they didn't get the pub/rep.
But back to the necro'd OP. My friend asked me this same thing the other day. I'll still pick GSW in 7 b/c they do have more good perimeter defenders.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|