-
Coach
Rank the Following Championship Teams (Post MJ's Bulls)
Basically the best 60+ win championship teams, post 90's Bulls, who dominated regular season and post season.
2015 Warriors 67-15
2014 Spurs 62-20
2013 Heat 66-16
2009 Lakers 65-17
2008 Celtics 66-16
2000 Lakers 67-15
-
I make 50-feet jumpers
Re: Rank the Following Championship Teams (Post MJ's Bulls)
2008 Celtics certainly didn't dominate in the playoffs. The same goes for 2000 Lakers.
That list is solely based on regular season W numbers and you want to include playoffs into judgement phase? Sounds legit.
-
Coach
Re: Rank the Following Championship Teams (Post MJ's Bulls)
Originally Posted by Odinn
2008 Celtics certainly didn't dominate in the playoffs. The same goes for 2000 Lakers.
That list is solely based on regular season W numbers and you want to include playoffs into judgement phase? Sounds legit.
Considering that all these teams also won chips in conjunction with their regular season dominance ... It seems very fair. Of course the playoffs are always more difficult to dominate given the level of competition.
-
I make 50-feet jumpers
Re: Rank the Following Championship Teams (Post MJ's Bulls)
Originally Posted by SamuraiSWISH
Considering that all these teams also won chips in conjunction with their regular season dominance ... It seems very fair. Of course the playoffs are always more difficult to dominate given the level of competition.
This is just sugarcoating it.
In 2008 playoffs; Boston Celtics were nearly eliminated by Atlanta Hawks in the 1st round. They played 2 game 7s against Atlanta Hawks and Cleveland Cavaliers ffs. How can that be mentioned among the word of dominance?
-
Coach
Re: Rank the Following Championship Teams (Post MJ's Bulls)
Originally Posted by Odinn
This is just sugarcoating it.
In 2008 playoffs; Boston Celtics were nearly eliminated by Atlanta Hawks in the 1st round. They played 2 game 7s against Atlanta Hawks and Cleveland Cavaliers ffs. How can that be mentioned among the word of dominance?
I am sugar coating but you're relying on "nearly" for your argument. Mother have been the best basketball teams of the past 16 seasons. Losing games in the playoffs to quality opponents or being challenged doesn't negate dominance. Winning mid 60 and up games is a very dominant team.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Rank the Following Championship Teams (Post MJ's Bulls)
Originally Posted by SamuraiSWISH
Basically the best 60+ win championship teams, post 90's Bulls, who dominated regular season and post season.
2015 Warriors 67-15
2014 Spurs 62-20
2013 Heat 66-16
2009 Lakers 65-17
2008 Celtics 66-16
2000 Lakers 67-15
Interesting thread bro.
I'd roll with Boston in 2008 first. 3 HOFers in their primes, best defense of the group, and were unique in that they played down (or up) to their competition. GREAT squad.
SA in 2014 would be second on my list, followed by the 2000 Lakers, 2009 Lakers, 2015 Warriors, and 2013 Heat.
sidenote: they weren't a 60 win team in the regular-season, but the 2001 Lakers were better than ALL teams mentioned here.
-
Verticle?
Re: Rank the Following Championship Teams (Post MJ's Bulls)
Originally Posted by SamuraiSWISH
Basically the best 60+ win championship teams, post 90's Bulls, who dominated regular season and post season.
2015 Warriors 67-15
2014 Spurs 62-20
2013 Heat 66-16
2009 Lakers 65-17
2008 Celtics 66-16
2000 Lakers 67-15
Only thing I'd change is putting the 2000 Lakers above the 2013 Heat. So:
15 Warriors
14 Spurs
00 Lakers
13 Heat
09 Lakers
08 Celtics
-
15x all nba legend
Re: Rank the Following Championship Teams (Post MJ's Bulls)
Odd that you chose the 00 Lakers when the 01 Lakers were significantly better and the GOAT play-offf team
-
I make 50-feet jumpers
Re: Rank the Following Championship Teams (Post MJ's Bulls)
Originally Posted by SamuraiSWISH
I am sugar coating but you're relying on "nearly" for your argument. Mother have been the best basketball teams of the past 16 seasons. Losing games in the playoffs to quality opponents or being challenged doesn't negate dominance. Winning mid 60 and up games is a very dominant team.
The Celtics were dominant in the regular season. They were dominant in the finals, but they were not dominant in the playoffs. If your expectation is to have both (rs+po) at the same time, the Celtics can not be mentioned. That great "defensive" side allowed 100+ points 7 times in the 2008 playoffs while not facing a single a great offense-oriented team. Their historical stature is mostly based on reputation and 66W. Not on their playoff time level of play. Simple as that.
2001 Lakers won 56 games in the rs, and yet they are quite possibly the best of the group. Hopefully you're getting my point. Because it's looking sad.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|