-
Re: If the Mavericks had beaten the Spurs....
Originally Posted by Cone
youre acting as if people are saying dallas is better (which they could be) and you're hanging on for dear life so your spurs get respect
idk what you're going on about... But as for the bolded, what do you mean by that? Mavs "could be" better, but aren't better?... I only answered the question. Mavs probably would have had trouble with both Portland and Thunder, for reasons I explained. That's my take at least... As for the thread, if we're assuming the Mavs won Game 7 instead of losing it badly, then I guess we're assuming the "Mavs are better" in this hypothetical, no? Hence my post. None the less, "better than the Spurs" or not, still think they wouldn't be best in the west or league. Would like to see Dallas pick up a big name in FA though (Melo maybe)
-
MFFL
Re: If the Mavericks had beaten the Spurs....
Mavs will get a SF and C this summer and be right back in the thick of things next March.
-
National High School Star
Re: If the Mavericks had beaten the Spurs....
Originally Posted by miles berg
Mavs will get a SF and C this summer and be right back in the thick of things next March.
The only really good center available is Gortat, and he might stay with the Wizards. What else is there? Jordan Hill? Trading for Larry Sanders?
-
I usually hit open layups
Re: If the Mavericks had beaten the Spurs....
With the Ibaka injury, I think they'd make it to the Finals and lose to Miami.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|