Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 36
  1. #16
    Life goes on. ILLsmak's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,306

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    ****in Richard Jefferson, real talk. Dude came in like a beast, has been playing like a beast, and it made a huge difference.

    I actually thought about it... I was like wow they should start RJ, but that was before Love went down... just cuz of how beast dude was, he was like the only one balling before. That was a great move by Lue.

    It's not about stats, it's about energy.

    I SEE NO REASON TO BELIEVE that it wasn't that line up change that made the difference. I guess Love is gonna have to accept a 6th man role.

    RJ a factor on D too.

    -Smak

  2. #17
    I rule the local playground dubnation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    R.I.P. NBA
    Posts
    553

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    Love is garbage. Straight up. I don't care what kind of stats he put up in Minnesota. Just by looking at him, I can tell he isn't the same player he was then, and even if he was, I doubt that he could be a great player on a finals team.

    He's slow, unathletic, and soft as charmin.

  3. #18
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    1,500

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheOne
    Discuss

    After 1 game? U are clearly retarded

  4. #19
    "3 is greater than 2" CuterThanRubio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Ricky's manbun
    Posts
    1,647

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    Definitely

    JR needs more touches to build his confidence, even if he starts cold you gotta keep finding him, can't afford to have Love wasting possessions that could be used for a greater purpose!

  5. #20
    Very good NBA starter tmacattack33's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    8,097

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    Quote Originally Posted by PWB15
    After 1 game? U are clearly retarded
    I think OP was also including last year's Finals (and last year's entire playoffs for the Cavs...as Love went down in round 1 last year and never came back).

    And so Cleveland is 3-4 against the Warriors without Love in the Finals. And 0-2 with him.

  6. #21
    NBA lottery pick livinglegend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    5,522

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    Quote Originally Posted by tmacattack33
    I think OP was also including last year's Finals (and last year's entire playoffs for the Cavs...as Love went down in round 1 last year and never came back).

    And so Cleveland is 3-4 against the Warriors without Love in the Finals. And 0-2 with him.
    To be fair, Kyrie and JR playing like shit and Lebron playing average had nothing to do with Love.

  7. #22
    I hit open 5-foot jumpshots with ease
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    273

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    Quote Originally Posted by PWB15
    After 1 game? U are clearly retarded
    Seems you are the only retard here. Everyone else is having meaningful discussions.

  8. #23
    Great college starter FatComputerNerd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Believeland
    Posts
    3,651

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    Cavs might not be in the finals if not for Love's great play throughout the playoffs.

  9. #24
    Decent college freshman theaussieguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,879

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    Quote Originally Posted by dubnation
    Love is garbage. Straight up. I don't care what kind of stats he put up in Minnesota. Just by looking at him, I can tell he isn't the same player he was then, and even if he was, I doubt that he could be a great player on a finals team.

    He's slow, unathletic, and soft as charmin.
    yeah, its actually amazing he was able to score so much in minny but thats what happens when u are given the greenlight and act on it at the expense of your team chemistry (see barea v love arguments). Love's release is far too slow to be an elite spot up shooter and he is far too soft and slow to be a bruiser in the paint.

  10. #25
    Verticle? plowking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    We goin' Sizzler
    Posts
    27,739

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    He is such a bad finisher at the ring man... Does a great job getting such good position, but then just lets it all go to waste. Not really a fan of his game. 7 threes a game, or whatever it is he takes is just not the way I want my PF playing. Thompson is so much more of a better fit. Gets inside, gets offensive boards, and gives them more possessions to play with. Love used to do it in his first couple of years in Minny, but then in his last two there, and now at the Cavs he doesn't want to. Might be that weight loss?

  11. #26
    The Magic are a trash HylianNightmare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    19,556

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    Quote Originally Posted by DMAVS41
    no, but the Warriors are just a nightmare for Love. bringing him off the bench for 16 to 20 minutes a game against the 2nd unit would still be plus ev for the Cavs imo.
    Exactly,matchups

  12. #27
    Very good NBA starter DukeDelonte13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,777

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    Nope, not even dangerously.

  13. #28
    Great college starter feyki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    3,610

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    Better defence , better ball movement , much more athleticism and versatile game .

    Lebron would be amazing fit with Porzi . Trade Love + some pieces for him .

  14. #29
    Local High School Star Rolando's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,825

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    I noticed the two previous games that Jefferson came in agressively and always contributed making smart plays.

    Jefferson should be starting regardless......matchups.

  15. #30
    ... on a leash ArbitraryWater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    I walk a higher path, son
    Posts
    46,681

    Default Re: Can we safely say Cavs are better without Love?

    Quote Originally Posted by FatComputerNerd
    Cavs might not be in the finals if not for Love's great play throughout the playoffs.
    what great play?

    Cavs had like three #1 picks and only got Irving out of it... terrible.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •