Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25
  1. #1
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,921

    Default Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    .
    Clippers destroyed shading and floating bigs repeatedly in clutch of Game 4 - very standard in today's game.. ANY perimeter ballhandler - [COLOR="Red"]even Austin Rivers[/COLOR] - should be expected to blow by bigs on the perimeter.












    AERIAL VIEW of perimeter ballhandlers toying with shading (A. Rivers = superstar).. Of course, with bigs getting beat on the perimeter, there's no resistance at the rim - the ballhandler gets an in-stride layup with the big flailing from behind:







    In today's game, with paint-camping banned, bigs are forced to come out of the paint to flood and shade in the ballhandler's wheelhouse: the perimeter.

    Shading was still used in previous eras on screen roll as well, but there was no spacing, so bigs still had help after getting beat on the perimeter - it wasn't an open lane like today.. But more importantly, in non-screen-roll situations, the option was there NOT to shade and just camp under the rim instead - this was the most-used and preferable option.. Today's defenders don't have this more optimal option.

    Defending guards on the perimeter is a massive disadvantage for bigs, but today's spacing and paint-camping ban necessitate it.. Otoh, in previous eras, there was no spacing and paint-camping was legal, so bigs didn't need to come out of the paint to shade on the perimeter - they could just wait right under the rim "with no time restriction", as stiplulated in [COLOR="Blue"]Rule 2b[/COLOR] of the Illegal Defense Guidelines.

    .
    Last edited by 3ball; 06-04-2015 at 02:51 PM.

  2. #2
    Kevin Love nba_55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,363

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    stfu 3ball

  3. #3
    dude, where's my shaq? buddha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,213

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    if bigs were camping in the paint the ballhandler would have a wide open free throw line jumper.. which should be a pretty automatic shot for guards.

  4. #4
    Curry fam navy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    15,095

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    stfu 3ball

    For the record that's not shading. That's switching because the primary defender was screened off.
    Last edited by navy; 04-28-2015 at 01:38 AM.

  5. #5
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,921

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    Quote Originally Posted by navy

    stfu 3ball

    For the record that's not shading. That's switching because the primary defender was screened off.
    for the record - every single one is shading - the big man is playing way off his man to anticipate and defend the impending ballhandler penetration.

    all gifs show the big man outside of the paint guarding a perimeter ballhandler 1-on-1..

    that's what shading does - it brings the big man out of the paint to defend a ballhandler on the perimeter, like every one of those GIFS..

    it's the same as previous eras, only previous eras had no spacing, so the big still had defenders in close proximity to help after they got beat on the perimeter... the GIFs show it all plain as day..
    .
    Last edited by 3ball; 04-28-2015 at 02:06 AM.

  6. #6
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,921

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    Quote Originally Posted by buddha
    if bigs were camping in the paint the ballhandler would have a wide open free throw line jumper.. which should be a pretty automatic shot for guards.
    bigs didn't need to shade as much in previous eras because teams didn't run nearly as many ballhandler-friendly screen rolls.

    nor did they start the screen rolls nearly as far out on the floor.
    .
    Last edited by 3ball; 04-28-2015 at 02:16 AM.

  7. #7
    dude, where's my shaq? buddha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,213

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    Quote Originally Posted by 3ball
    bigs didn't need to shade as much in previous eras because teams didn't run nearly as many ballhandler-friendly screen rolls.

    nor did they start the screen rolls nearly as far out on the floor.
    so what the *** is your point then?

  8. #8
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,921

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    Quote Originally Posted by buddha
    so what the *** is your point then?
    today's spacing and defensive 3 seconds opens up the middle of the floor, making for a much more screen-roll friendly environment and therefore an easier environment for all ballhandlers.

  9. #9
    dude, where's my shaq? buddha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,213

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    Quote Originally Posted by 3ball
    today's spacing and defensive 3 seconds opens up the middle of the floor, making for a much more screen-roll friendly environment and therefore an easier environment for all ballhandlers.
    yeah that's pretty damn obvious. why do you feel the need to make a bunch of threads about it?

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    5,645

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    No one gives a ****.

  11. #11
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,921

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    Quote Originally Posted by buddha
    yeah that's pretty damn obvious. why do you feel the need to make a bunch of threads about it?
    it might be obvious to you, but not so much for a lot of other fans.

    but previous eras simply didn't have the wider lanes provided by spacing, so you didn't see as much of the easy shit (porous shading) that i posted in the OP, that even austin rivers can murder.

    today's spacing simply provides a much friendlier screen-roll environment.. the hand-check ban and hands-off approach to defense only further facilitates an easier environment for perimeter ballhandlers (which of course, includes all wings - in case you thought it only helped PG's... it helps ANY perimeter player that handles the ball).

  12. #12
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer warriorfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    33,412

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    When you have no handchecking, no paint camping, and set screens every play even Austin Rivers can appear to be a strong slasher.

  13. #13
    Very good NBA starter
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8,370

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    Some pathetic defense by Duncan.

    lol @ clowns on here talking about how he "anchors" that defense.

  14. #14
    Game. Set. Match. bdreason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    HB, CA
    Posts
    24,875

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    With all that paint packing defense, they must have shot a lot of 3's back in the 90's.

  15. #15
    NBA Superstar Heavincent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    12,992

    Default Re: Do you guys still think shading is the shit?

    I still have no idea why 3ball talks about spacing like it hurts the game.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •