Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
  1. #1
    NBA Legend Kiddlovesnets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    16,082

    Default 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    It's Wilt vs Kareem. The former is only 2-4 in NBA finals, about as good as Lebron James, but he won both titles as the team's No.1 man. The latter has 6 rings in total, and a 6-4 record in NBA finals, but was only 1 alpha ring with the other five being Magic's sidekick. Whom do you think is the No.1 center in NBA history then? How much value will you place on sidekick rings?
    Last edited by Kiddlovesnets; 07-29-2015 at 04:02 PM.

  2. #2
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Myth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    22,884

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    Kareem only has 1 alpha ring?

    He has at least 2.

  3. #3
    Facts Are Misleading
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    A Court Near You
    Posts
    6,210

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    He has 2 for sure.

    Another one where he was at least the co best player.

  4. #4
    College superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    4,607

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    In a season which he was the NBA MVP he went 33.4/13.6 with 4.6Bl on 55% FG. That is NOT a sidekick ring.

    Nor is going for 26/9 on >60% FG in winning the FMVP.

    Nor is leading the MILWAUKEE BUCKS to the title.

    ISH keeps getting worse and worse.

  5. #5
    Seething... ClipperRevival's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    7,971

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    KAJ has 2 FMVP and very easily could've been the FMVP in 1980, but Magic's legendary game 6 got him the nod.

    And Wilt won the FMVP in 1972 but you can argue that West was their best player over the entire season.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    14,477

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    kareem was the legit lead dog for 3 of his 6


    magic owes him the 1980 fmvp

  7. #7
    sahelanthropus fpliii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    9,665

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    Quote Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
    kareem was the legit lead dog for 3 of his 6


    magic owes him the 1980 fmvp


    http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=301909

    No disrespect to Magic. He probably should have Worthy's FMVP.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    14,477

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    wilts rings sucked



    1967 Wilt Chamberlain = 17.7 finals PPG

    his team mate Hal Greer = 26.0 finals PPG







    1972 wilt won FMVP... but:

    1st option Gail Goodrich = 25.6 finals PPG

    2nd option Jerry West = 19.8 finals PPG

    3rd option Wilt Chamberlain = 19.4 finals PPG

  9. #9
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,195

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    ALPHA RINGS

  10. #10
    Embiid > Jokic SouBeachTalents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    27,237

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    Kareem has at least 2 alpha rings, not sure how anyone in their right mind could say he wasn't the best player on the '80 Lakers. Their next two titles are extremely close as well, although I'd prob give the nod to Magic

  11. #11
    I usually hit open layups
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    the darkest timeline
    Posts
    174

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    For me,

    when Kareem himself says Wilt was better than him... and this is just the impression he got playing an old Wilt as in he can't imagine what it would have been like to go up against this guy in his youth...


  12. #12
    I usually hit open layups
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    the darkest timeline
    Posts
    174

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    Quote Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
    1972 wilt won FMVP... but:

    1st option Gail Goodrich = 25.6 finals PPG

    2nd option Jerry West = 19.8 finals PPG

    3rd option Wilt Chamberlain = 19.4 finals PPG
    hence the stupidity of measuring everything greatness related by scoring...

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    14,477

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    Quote Originally Posted by superteamtheory
    hence the stupidity of measuring everything greatness related by scoring...

    well to be fair. thats all the box scores list


  14. #14
    College star
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,039

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    Quote Originally Posted by Kiddlovesnets
    It's Wilt vs Kareem. The former is only 2-4 in NBA finals, about as good as Lebron James, but he won both titles as the team's No.1 man. The latter has 6 rings in total, and a 6-4 record in NBA finals, but was only 1 alpha ring with the other five being Magic's sidekick. Whom do you think is the No.1 center in NBA history then? How much value will you place on sidekick rings?
    WTF.
    Kareem has 6 alpha rings.
    Magic was Robin and Kareem was Batman.

  15. #15
    Kwisatz Haderach MJistheGOAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,074

    Default Re: 2 alpha rings + 0 sidekick ring VS 1 alpha ring + 5 sidekick rings

    LOL at Kareem having 1 alpha ring.

    He has AT LEAST 2, I give him 3.

    Wilt and Kareem are top 3 GOAT.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •