Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 109
  1. #31
    Down with GLOBALISM poido123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,576

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    Quote Originally Posted by toxicxr6


    Spurs bench one of the greatest in history bra

    Dam one of the worst posts I have seen in awhile

    Spurs bench one of the best in history?

    No explanation behind that?

    You're talking out of your ass.


    That's my opinion. I think the Bulls have a stronger bench. They have 2 or 3 legit starters on their bench, where the spurs have 1, maybe 2.

  2. #32
    Paid shill Jameerthefear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Swimming in cash
    Posts
    37,664

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    Quote Originally Posted by poido123
    Spurs bench one of the best in history?

    No explanation behind that?

    You're talking out of your ass.


    That's my opinion. I think the Bulls have a stronger bench. They have 2 or 3 legit starters on their bench, where the spurs have 1, maybe 2.
    You are such a f*cking homer. Just stop.

  3. #33
    Down with GLOBALISM poido123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,576

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    Quote Originally Posted by swagga
    the bigs are intriguing, i agree, but I haven't seen them play together and pau is best suited near the basket not shooting, as is noah. You usually play high-low with passing bigs like spain in this wc, but one of them has to have a realiable jumper (marc gasol/ibaka are excellent midrange shooters). SO spacing might be an issue here.

    and you best be kidding with the bolded as starter level offense creators. I'm talking about guys that can create while guarded in a playoffs athmosphere, not guys for the regular season against philly and minnesota. Do you have faith that dunleavy or aaron brooks can initiate an offense against a solid defense?? I don't. Also none of the bulls guards are known for their post passing.

    You are talking about guards. You are completely ignoring the possibilities of offense generated through our passing big men as well as rose.

    While we may lack creative guards who break guys off the dribble, we have two bigmen to dump the ball into and do work. We also have much more capable shooters to punish the defenses either collapsing on rose or the big men.

    You can't just assume that we are the same team from 2011 which;

    1. had no reliable shooters outside of korver

    2. had no inside post play to draw in defenses

    3. lack of chemistry

  4. #34
    Down with GLOBALISM poido123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,576

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jameerthefear
    You are such a f*cking homer. Just stop.

    Posting in a bulls thread.

    Am I doing something wrong here?

  5. #35
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,660

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    Quote Originally Posted by RedBlackAttack
    Having Thibs on the sidelines doesn't hurt. If the Spurs showed you one thing last season, it is that talent isn't the only thing that matters. Chicago has a lot of new parts, so we'll have to see how they fit along with Rose's status. But, it doesn't hurt when you have a proven commodity like Thibs running practices and sitting on the sidelines.
    Having the best coach in the league in Greg Popovich doesn't hurt either.

  6. #36
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,491

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    Quote Originally Posted by poido123
    Spurs bench one of the best in history?

    No explanation behind that?

    You're talking out of your ass.


    That's my opinion. I think the Bulls have a stronger bench. They have 2 or 3 legit starters on their bench, where the spurs have 1, maybe 2.


    Spurs bench stats last season

    Points: 44.5ppg (1st)
    FG%: 47.8 (1st)
    Assists: 10.9 (1st)
    Rebounds: 16.8 (2nd)
    3pt%: 39.1% (2nd)
    Steals: 3.3 (3rd)


    Now if you don't think the spurs have a legit top 10 ever bench please go find 10 better.. Not gonna happen..

    Bulls have a decent bench but they are far behind the spurs.. It ain't even close

    When rose sucks this season and bulls are meh.. What you going to say then ha?


    Bulls bench>spurs bench

  7. #37
    I usually hit open layups
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    183

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    I'm a bulls fan and I don't get the hype. Rose will not be the 2011 Rose, not even close. Pau Gasol is not that much better than Boozer, he is also 34 on the downside of his career. Mirotic and McDermott are rookies so you have NO idea what to really expect from them. The Bulls strength is Tibbs his coaching and preparedness gives them an edge over most NBA teams. If the team is 100% healthy and Rose is at least at 80% of his MVP self we will win 55 games.

  8. #38
    Down with GLOBALISM poido123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,576

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    Quote Originally Posted by toxicxr6
    Spurs bench stats last season

    Points: 44.5ppg (1st)
    FG%: 47.8 (1st)
    Assists: 10.9 (1st)
    Rebounds: 16.8 (2nd)
    3pt%: 39.1% (2nd)
    Steals: 3.3 (3rd)


    Now if you don't think the spurs have a legit top 10 ever bench please go find 10 better.. Not gonna happen..

    Bulls have a decent bench but they are far behind the spurs.. It ain't even close

    When rose sucks this season and bulls are meh.. What you going to say then ha?


    Bulls bench>spurs bench

    Top 10 ever bench? That is plausible. The best ever is quite a statement though. Some of the 80's celtics teams had hall of famers on the bench.

    Very impressive stats there and hard to argue that.

    As we haven't seen the current Bulls bench operate together, I can only say that the Bulls have 2 to 3 legit starters coming off the bench. Spurs stats are very impressive there, but I would guess this bench is capable of those stats too.

  9. #39
    Very good NBA starter
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    8,192

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    Quote Originally Posted by poido123
    Spurs bench one of the best in history?

    No explanation behind that?

    You're talking out of your ass.


    That's my opinion. I think the Bulls have a stronger bench. They have 2 or 3 legit starters on their bench, where the spurs have 1, maybe 2.
    Manu, Diaw, Belinelli,Mills dont ring a bell?

    Spurs bench>> Bulls bench

  10. #40
    Down with GLOBALISM poido123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,576

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cocaine80s
    Manu, Diaw, Belinelli,Mills dont ring a bell?

    Spurs bench>> Bulls bench

    I know what their bench is.

    Manu is getting old, Diaw is interchangeable as a starter with Splitter, Bellinelli was a non-factor, and Mills had a good season and finals series but let's not overate him.

  11. #41
    King of LA Lebronxrings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    6,939

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    do what i do.

    Wait for a month, drose gets injured, talk dies down.

  12. #42
    Very good NBA starter
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    8,192

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    Quote Originally Posted by poido123
    I know what their bench is.

    Manu is getting old, Diaw is interchangeable as a starter with Splitter, Bellinelli was a non-factor, and Mills had a good season and finals series but let's not overate him.
    what do you mean by non factor?

    How are you only gonna count finals performances for these guys when the bulls bench havent played in the finals either. Belinelli and Mills definitely played like starter material last season. Btw Manu was a year older last year and played even better than the 2012-2013 season

  13. #43
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,491

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    Quote Originally Posted by poido123
    I know what their bench is.

    Manu is getting old, Diaw is interchangeable as a starter with Splitter, Bellinelli was a non-factor, and Mills had a good season and finals series but let's not overate him.

    Waiting....

  14. #44
    shhhhhhh
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Downtown Hoops Dojo
    Posts
    28,557

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    About the only thing the spurs and bulls really have in common is people tend to sleep on them...

    Bulls will make some noise this season.. the 29 other teams won't be dismissing them like the haters are.. If Rose is healthy (BIG IF) this team is going to be scary good by the time all star break rolls around.. this is a solid roster in a weak conference with a good coach

  15. #45
    Local High School Star BIZARRO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    1,318

    Default Re: am i alone not understanding the bulls hype?

    Not that it's all that pertinent to this thread. But don't sleep on Tony Snell. He's really improved his game dramatically by all accounts (and the eye test in summer league), and will definitely help them more than expected off the bench.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •