-
One of the Goodfellas
What was the weakest Western Conference Playoffs after 1999?
I always felt that the 2003 Western Conference were weak. There was really no other team to face the Spurs, the 50-32 Lakers were clearly exhausted after a 3-peat and lacked A LOT of depth and solid play from their bench players.
-
Embiid > Jokic
Re: What was the weakest Western Conference Playoffs after 1999?
-
Local High School Star
Re: What was the weakest Western Conference Playoffs after 1999?
Originally Posted by NBAplayoffs2001
I always felt that the 2003 Western Conference were weak. There was really no other team to face the Spurs, the 50-32 Lakers were clearly exhausted after a 3-peat and lacked A LOT of depth and solid play from their bench players.
West:
2003 Champions Spurs
2003 Mavs with Nash & Finley & Dirk & Van Exel
2003 Three time champions Lakers
2003 Sacramento kings (nearly same roster than 2002, lost in 7 vs Dallas)
also phoenix had a good team (lost in 1st round 4-2 vs spurs, they had amare, marion, marbury, joe johnson, anfernee hardaway...., and dont forget kevin Garnett wolves...
-
RIP P
Re: What was the weakest Western Conference Playoffs after 1999?
2003.
Webber injured.
Dirk injured.
Lakers <<< previous years.
One man Wolves.
Spurs were good but not as talented as other years.
Basically a bunch of 50 win teams accounting for injuries besides SA.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|