Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 88
  1. #16
    Decent college freshman Dbrog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,878

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    Quote Originally Posted by DonDadda59
    I need to watch more games from the era. But watching those 2 vids just reminded me of a typical Spurs game. No pointless dribbling or ball-hogging, ball is constantly in motion and so are the players, no real super athleticism on display just fundamentals. I wonder if there were any Clippers-like squads then- team full of ridiculous athletes who put on dunking exhibitions every night but can't get out of the 1st round
    Hahaha ya maybe Oscar's Royals or something. Could only imagine prime Oscar diming everywhere. Probably not much dunking though since it was considered showboating back then. A team I would really like to know more about were the 60s St Louis Hawks. I know they were pretty beast almost every year and incredibly stacked...just ran into Wilt a lot.

  2. #17
    Curry fam navy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    15,095

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    They lack muscle mass.

  3. #18
    NBA All-star tomtucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    9,810

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    ................they hit the basket just as good as the players of today

  4. #19
    NBA Legend LAZERUSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,317

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    Interesting too that the NBA shot a higher FT% in the 58-59 season (.756) than they are doing in today's NBA (.753.) Or that in the 73-74 season, it was at .771.

    I guess those players were just better shooters...

  5. #20
    Kobe= 1st round loser secund2nun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,267

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    Quote Originally Posted by TylerOO
    Looks like the old men that play halfcourt at the park
    +1

    I can't believe people actually take players and stats serious from that era.

  6. #21
    '10-13, '15 Ed Wachter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Troy
    Posts
    181

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    Imagine if the 1902-03 Camden Electrics played today. Pure shooting talent by comparison.


  7. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The Killing Fields
    Posts
    17,013

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    Quote Originally Posted by navy
    They lack muscle mass.
    These dudes were a Ray Allen miracle shot away from winning it all last June



    Hopefully the NBA's anti-doping program catches them soon.

    And lest we forget that this guy...



    Shut down this guy for a huge chunk of the series...




  8. #23
    Possessed by B-Ball Ancient Legend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,620

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    There was no blatant palming of the ball like today. Other than that the level is comparable. Next

  9. #24
    soundcloud.com/agua-1 andgar923's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    18,568

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    Quote Originally Posted by DonDadda59
    These dudes were a Ray Allen miracle shot away from winning it all last June



    Hopefully the NBA's anti-doping program catches them soon.

    And lest we forget that this guy...



    Shut down this guy for a huge chunk of the series...



    to top it off, they were old/past their prime and playing injured.

    Nique stated how hard the Celtics were at beating recently. Even tho the Hawks were uber athletic and young while the Celts were slower and unathletic they couldn't beat the Celts. It wasn't as tho the Hawks were sucky, it just happened to be that the Celts were better. Lakers were a fast athletic team as well, but even they couldn't always beat the Celts.

    Athleticism can only help you so much if the ball is constantly moving and there's set plays with tons of screens on offense. No player can move faster than the ball, plain and simple. There's also a reason why And1 type handles aren't used on every play of the game. Yeah they can come in handy in certain scenarios, but the vast majority of the game is played almost the same way as its always been.

  10. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The Killing Fields
    Posts
    17,013

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    Quote Originally Posted by andgar923
    to top it off, they were old/past their prime and playing injured.

    Nique stated how hard the Celtics were at beating recently. Even tho the Hawks were uber athletic and young while the Celts were slower and unathletic they couldn't beat the Celts. It wasn't as tho the Hawks were sucky, it just happened to be that the Celts were better. Lakers were a fast athletic team as well, but even they couldn't always beat the Celts.

    Athleticism can only help you so much if the ball is constantly moving and there's set plays with tons of screens on offense. No player can move faster than the ball, plain and simple. There's also a reason why And1 type handles aren't used on every play of the game. Yeah they can come in handy in certain scenarios, but the vast majority of the game is played almost the same way as its always been.
    Yeah, I would take the 86 Celtics over any team ever in a 7 game series. Obviously not the most athletic squad, but they had extremely skilled players at every position and just played the game the right way. Basically a younger and far more stacked/talented version of the Spurs today.

    Athleticism gets overrated by many. If that's all it took, the Clippers would be championship favorites every year instead of first round losers.

  11. #26
    Kobe= 1st round loser secund2nun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,267

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    Quote Originally Posted by DonDadda59
    These dudes were a Ray Allen miracle shot away from winning it all last June



    Hopefully the NBA's anti-doping program catches them soon.

    And lest we forget that this guy...



    Shut down this guy for a huge chunk of the series...



    25/11/7 finals MVP is being shut down?

  12. #27
    NBA sixth man of the year Micku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    7,617

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    Quote Originally Posted by cos88
    if someone asks about dribbling and why it looks so stiff is because palming wasn't legal/overlooked back then not because that's the only way they can dribble.
    I don't know. Back then ppl were amaze of how Bob Cousy was handling the ball. There was a clear difference in terms of dribbling with guys like Bob Cousy who didn't look as awkward or stiff compared to the other perimeter players when going left. Since a lot of guys today have better dribbling skills as Cousy, and don't look awkward going to their left either. But it's not players couldn't go to their left at all tho.

    Other skills like passing was always great.


    Quote Originally Posted by cos88
    also this was 47 years ago it's natural the game evolves as every single thing in world did ( except for quality skilled big man with post moves which are extinct now )
    Wilt imo always looked awkward when backing down. Some of the footwork looked awkward too. Compare to a guy like Willis Reed who didn't look nearly as awkward with his dribbling or his jumpshot. Wilt didn't box out often it seems. I guess you can argue that he didn't need to because he jumped higher and is stronger than the other guys.

    But despite that, Wilt had a variety of post moves and a nice touch to finish. You can see old Wilt vs Kareem and old Kareem vs Hakeem. As you said, post moves are extinct now for big men. It's just the style of play atm, so one team have to get a big guy (whoever that is out there in the world) and play that style of basketball and win a championship with it to encourage the rest of the league to do so again.

  13. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The Killing Fields
    Posts
    17,013

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    Quote Originally Posted by secund2nun
    25/11/7 finals MVP is being shut down?
    Come on dawg, we all watched the series. Whenever Diaw was on him, Bron couldn't get anything done. For long stretches he looked like his 2011 finals self with the Spurs daring him to shoot by giving him like 5 ft of space. He picked it up towards the end of the series though.

  14. #29
    I brick nerf balls La Frescobaldi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    4,998

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    Quote Originally Posted by cos88
    if someone asks about dribbling and why it looks so stiff is because palming wasn't legal/overlooked back then not because that's the only way they can dribble.


    sure players now have better dribbling moves but that has nothing to do with their skills or talents, they just had to follow different rules.



    also this was 47 years ago it's natural the game evolves as every single thing in world did ( except for quality skilled big man with post moves which are extinct now )
    Not extinct. This man has elite skills in the key:


  15. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    402

    Default Re: This is the level of NBA games in the 60s...

    Quote Originally Posted by La Frescobaldi
    Not extinct. This man has elite skills in the key:



    And this one

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •