-
Local High School Star
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Originally Posted by DaHeezy
The ring argument really started to form from the insecurities of Kobe and Jordan stans towards Lebron and really took off from there.
The ring argument has been a factor since Mikan. It's nothing new.
-
Gif-ted
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Originally Posted by Poetry
The ring argument has been a factor since Mikan. It's nothing new.
You're still alive?
-
RIP P
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Question: Who do y'all rank higher, John Stockton or Tony Parker?
-
Local High School Star
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Originally Posted by bigkingsfan
You're still alive?
I am.
Did someone slay me when I wasn't looking?
-
NBA sixth man of the year
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
Gretzky won 4 rings
There are 20 players who won 6 or more. Messier won 6. Maurice Richard won 9. Henri won 11. For a player of Gretzky's calibre should have at least 6.
-
Mugshot from SlyCooper
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
You can use ring count only when they are the first option and they played good/great in the finals
Why is this so hard for people to understand
-
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Clearly these bran stans dont know about basketball. Stats and rings dont go together. If you want rings, youve got to sacrifice stats. Thats why we go for rings first before stats. The goal of the game is to win so its unfair for them to be compared to bran when theyve sacrificed stats. I guess wilt and oscar>>> jordan when we all knew jordan could avg triple doubles if he wanted to. You guys are stupid. No wonder you all are bran stans.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Originally Posted by Nilocon165
You can use ring count only when they are the first option and they played good/great in the finals
Why is this so hard for people to understand
it's hard because with that formula Russell is the GOAT and MJ stans refuse to acknowledge that.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Originally Posted by knicksman
Clearly these bran stans dont know about basketball. Stats and rings dont go together. If you want rings, youve got to sacrifice stats. Thats why we go for rings first before stats. The goal of the game is to win so its unfair for them to be compared to bran when theyve sacrificed stats. I guess wilt and oscar>>> jordan when we all knew jordan could avg triple doubles if he wanted to. You guys are stupid. No wonder you all are bran stans.
Russell >>> MJ
He has 5 more rings than Jordan while playing 2 less seasons... GOAT
-
Long Live The Process
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Originally Posted by livinglegend
Russell >>> MJ
He has 5 more rings than Jordan while playing 2 less seasons... GOAT
It is a valid argument, but 30.1 ppg and 33.4 ppg in the playoffs say otherwise.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Originally Posted by fourkicks44
It is a valid argument, but 30.1 ppg and 33.4 ppg in the playoffs say otherwise.
Well, this is the problem.
When it doesn't fit your agenda, you change the criteria.
When it's Lebron, it's all about rings as the man ( and sacrificing stats, and all that crap) and when it's russell, it's about stats.
Cherry picking narratives
This is why nobody takes MJ/Kobe stans seriously. They flip flop all the time. They can stay consistent.
-
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Originally Posted by livinglegend
Russell >>> MJ
He has 5 more rings than Jordan while playing 2 less seasons... GOAT
Different era. In this era, russell type of players cant win anymore dipshit
-
GOAT
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Originally Posted by livinglegend
Well, this is the problem.
When it doesn't fit your agenda, you change the criteria.
When it's Lebron, it's all about rings as the man ( and sacrificing stats, and all that crap) and when it's russell, it's about stats.
Cherry picking narratives
This is why nobody takes MJ/Kobe stans seriously. They flip flop all the time. They can stay consistent.
stopitgetsomehelp.gif
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: using ring count to determine how great a player is
Originally Posted by sportjames23
stopitgetsomehelp.gif
1-9.gif
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|