Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    XXL Im Still Ballin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    23,803

    Question Anti-Gun Nerds.. Answer THIS!

    Can a [COLOR="Blue"]gun[/COLOR] kill someone without a [COLOR="Red"]human[/COLOR]?

    Can a [COLOR="Red"]human[/COLOR] kill someone without a [COLOR="Blue"]gun[/COLOR]?

    Real Eyes
    Realize
    Real Lies


    Trust no one!

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    California of America
    Posts
    18,184

    Default Re: Anti-Gun Nerds.. Answer THIS!

    Candidate for Post of the Year.

    -Nice colors
    -Good play on words
    -Comprehension
    -Gist
    -Format
    -Ownage
    -Wreckage
    -justadamngoodpost

  3. #3
    Impartial NBA analyst sd3035's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,808

    Default Re: Anti-Gun Nerds.. Answer THIS!

    Quite a legendary post indeed

  4. #4
    #Trump4Treason nathanjizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,787

    Default Re: Anti-Gun Nerds.. Answer THIS!

    im not an anti gun nerd. but if that is your argument, that guns dont kill people, people kill people, then shouldnt we ban people from having guns?

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    California of America
    Posts
    18,184

    Default Re: Anti-Gun Nerds.. Answer THIS!

    Quote Originally Posted by nathanjizzle
    im not an anti gun nerd. but if that is your argument, that guns dont kill people, people kill people, then shouldnt we ban people from having guns?
    Not logical.

    Any philosophy professor would say so.

  6. #6
    Life goes on. ILLsmak's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,331

    Default Re: Anti-Gun Nerds.. Answer THIS!

    Quote Originally Posted by 9erempiree
    Not logical.

    Any philosophy professor would say so.
    All things being fair... I think it is actually logical. haha. Something I didn't see coming, either.

    I mean, feel free to explain why you think it's wrong. When applied to reality, it may be (cuz many variables), but in the context of "Don't ban guns because people kill people with guns" I think it logically follows to take it to the next point "Well, let's ban people from having guns."

    It is of the same logic. If you say X is the catalyst of completely will-less tool Y, it doesn't follow to say ban x (as I think people have suggested in jest), it makes more sense to suggest banning situations that allow X and Y to come together in that manner.

    It's not a logical answer, but neither is "do guns kill people or people with guns?" It becomes about semantics and language, and I believe yaboy has a point.

    -Smak

  7. #7
    NBA Legend FKAri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    16,673

    Default Re: Anti-Gun Nerds.. Answer THIS!

    Isn't OP Australian? wtf

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •