Page 1 of 8 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 117
  1. #1
    why I even like Rondo CeltsGarlic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    with Rondo
    Posts
    7,606

    Default Total shooting this total shooting that

    Fvck TS%!

    Im the only one from the times here people looked at FG% to decide if someone is hitting their shots? Im the only one who remembers when comparison threads didnt have one season TS% and the other one FG% selected.. Im the only one who likes his stats raw?

    #FvckTS%

  2. #2
    You are amazing SexSymbol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    Posts
    5,918

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    Get off my lawn you damn kids

  3. #3
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,309

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    but TS% looks good because its usually above 50..

  4. #4
    why I even like Rondo CeltsGarlic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    with Rondo
    Posts
    7,606

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    Back in my day above 50's usually didnt look good..

  5. #5
    NBA Legend dunksby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    15,488

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    Quote Originally Posted by CeltsGarlic
    Fvck TS%!

    Im the only one from the times here people looked at FG% to decide if someone is hitting their shots? Im the only one who remembers when comparison threads didnt have one season TS% and the other one FG% selected.. Im the only one who likes his stats raw?

    #FvckTS%
    It stands for True Shooting Percentage you dumbass.

  6. #6
    why I even like Rondo CeltsGarlic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    with Rondo
    Posts
    7,606

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    Quote Originally Posted by dunksby
    It stands for True Shooting Percentage you dumbass.
    Boy, you dont start what you cant handle.

  7. #7
    NBA Legend dunksby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    15,488

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    Quote Originally Posted by CeltsGarlic
    Boy, you dont start what you cant handle.
    Do you have bad breath? Cause I can't handle talking to people who have foul breath.

  8. #8
    NBA Legend tontoz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15,971

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    OP is a dumbass. If you don't like TS then use EFG which doesn't include free throws.

    FG actually penalizes players for shooting 3s. If a guy takes a lot of 3s and shoots them at 39% that is good but it typically brings down his FG%

    Look at Lillard vs Wall

    FG%

    Lillard 45.4%
    Wall 44.8%

    Lillard's is better by .6%

    EFG%

    Lillard 53.7%
    Wall 47.9%

    Lillard's is better by 5.8%


    FG% is useless unless you are looking at players who don't shoot 3s.

  9. #9
    why I even like Rondo CeltsGarlic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    with Rondo
    Posts
    7,606

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    Quote Originally Posted by tontoz
    OP is a dumbass. If you don't like TS then use EFG which doesn't include free throws.

    FG actually penalizes players for shooting 3s. If a guy takes a lot of 3s and shoots them at 39% that is good but it typically brings down his FG%

    Look at Lillard vs Wall

    FG%

    Lillard 45.4%
    Wall 44.8%

    Lillard's is better by .6%

    EFG%

    Lillard 53.7%
    Wall 47.9%

    Lillard's is better by 5.8%


    FG% is useless unless you are looking at players who don't shoot 3s.
    Yeah, so you also need to use common sense when looking at stats like FG, but I guess thats not for you.

  10. #10
    Gambling expert StephHamann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    5,002

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    We need a new statistic that doesn't count dunks and layups as shooting.

    Brandan wright "shoots" something like 70% but we all know he can't shoot a j if his live depended on it.

  11. #11
    NBA Legend tontoz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15,971

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    Quote Originally Posted by CeltsGarlic
    Yeah, so you also need to use common sense when looking at stats like FG, but I guess thats not for you.

    This from a guy who didn't even know what TS stands for.

    Common sense tells us that FG% is basically worthless in the 3 point era. Better to use a stat that doesn't require interpretation.

  12. #12
    for your health Prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,739

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    Quote Originally Posted by CeltsGarlic
    Fvck TS%!

    Im the only one from the times here people looked at FG% to decide if someone is hitting their shots? Im the only one who remembers when comparison threads didnt have one season TS% and the other one FG% selected.. Im the only one who likes his stats raw?

    #FvckTS%

  13. #13
    Local High School Star Akhenaten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,188

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    goofy, lame azz stat nerd bullcrap

    the idea that there is such a thing as a "true" percentage is so inane, so stupid...I can't.

    PPP has NOTHING to do with percentage
    they just comingled two completely separate precepts and masquerade is as being "advanced".

    The stat basically tells us that a player get's more points more making a 3 point basket as opposed to a 2, just absolutely brilliant stuff .

    "True" completely ignore MISSED shots.
    So that if a player make 40 out of 100 three point shots he's just as effective/efficient as a player who makes 60 out of 100 2 point attempts.

    They both "effectively" or "truly" shot 60%

    NO THEY DID NOT!
    you cant award percentage point because they happen to have the same point TOTALS, the 20 extra MISSED shots don't factor in AT ALL.

    Shaq scoring a 120 points on 60% is not nowhere near the same as Kobe scoring 120 on 40%, only a simpleton who thinks he's an intellectual thinks like that (like goofy azz Hollinger and the other "advanced" stat nerds).

  14. #14
    Laker Nation riseagainst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    11,514

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    OP is the type of person who hates TS% but loves PER and WS.

  15. #15
    Local High School Star Akhenaten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,188

    Default Re: Total shooting this total shooting that

    Quote Originally Posted by riseagainst
    OP is the type of person who hates TS% but loves PER and WS.
    That sh!t stupid too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •