-
Local High School Star
The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
Basically, there's no counterplay to it.
In every game, there must be balance. You are allowed to use strategies but the other team must be allowed to counter them.
Take for example Rondo on the Celtics who couldn't shoot outside shots. The strategy is to sag off and invite him to shoot. The counter? Rondo chooses not to shoot.
In the Hack-a-Shaq strategy, you have literally no choice but to shoot. You're literally forced into your weakness.
So how come players who have other weaknesses (can't dribble, can't shoot, etc) can choose to not dribble or not shoot even if the opposing team dares them to, while bad free throw shooters can be sent to the line against their will?
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
Originally Posted by TheCalmInsanity
Basically, there's no counterplay to it.
In every game, there must be balance. You are allowed to use strategies but the other team must be allowed to counter them.
Take for example Rondo on the Celtics who couldn't shoot outside shots. The strategy is to sag off and invite him to shoot. The counter? Rondo chooses not to shoot.
In the Hack-a-Shaq strategy, you have literally no choice but to shoot. You're literally forced into your weakness.
So how come players who have other weaknesses (can't dribble, can't shoot, etc) can choose to not dribble or not shoot even if the opposing team dares them to, while bad free throw shooters can be sent to the line against their will?
You've never seen someone get forced into their weakness?
You ever watch a bad/slow defender be purposefully put into pick and roles by the offense and attacked?
Anyway, the current counter is to take the bad FT shooter out of the game...which I've seen with DeAndre Jordan.
-
NBA Legend
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
Or allow the dunking of FTAs.
Like Chamberlain was doing in the mid-50's. Let a player take three steps from behind the FT line, and jump behind from the line.
Has to be a dunk, though.
-
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
it doesnt even work. this has been proven countless times
even if youre a 50% free throw shooter. youl make 1 out of 2 each time up the floor
thats 2 points every 2 possessions
which is 50% fg's
most teams hope to hit 50% of their shots
-
NBA Legend
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
it doesnt even work. this has been proven countless times
even if youre a 50% free throw shooter. youl make 1 out of 2 each time up the floor
thats 2 points every 2 possessions
which is 50% fg's
most teams hope to hit 50% of their shots
Not so sure any more. I believe the Warriors are averaging something like 1.1 points per possession... or 2.2 points per 2 possessions.
And then when you factor in that guys like Drummond and Jordan are way below 50%...
-
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
It's a non-basketball play.
One FT and the ball
The end.
-
NBA Legend
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
I LOVE hack-a-shaq. They should get rid of the final 2 min restriction as well
Counterplay: Bench the scrub who can't hit his free throws.
-
RIP P
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
it doesnt even work. this has been proven countless times
even if youre a 50% free throw shooter. youl make 1 out of 2 each time up the floor
thats 2 points every 2 possessions
which is 50% fg's
most teams hope to hit 50% of their shots
This is why FG% is outdated.
2 points per 2 possessions isn't good.
That's a 100 ORtg which is terrible offense.
This current Laker team that is 10-41 has that exact same offensive efficiency.
-
Game. Set. Match.
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
Coach can bench the player if he doesn't think he can hit the FT's.
-
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
Originally Posted by FKAri
I LOVE hack-a-shaq. They should get rid of the final 2 min restriction as well
Counterplay: Bench the scrub who can't hit his free throws.
If anything the 2 minute restriction is blatantly biased towards players who can't shoot FT's. Why should scrubs who can't hit their free throws be given a clutch?
-
Local High School Star
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
Originally Posted by tmacattack33
You've never seen someone get forced into their weakness?
You ever watch a bad/slow defender be purposefully put into pick and roles by the offense and attacked?
Anyway, the current counter is to take the bad FT shooter out of the game...which I've seen with DeAndre Jordan.
There's counterplay to bad/slow defenders... switch, help side, etc.
Taking a player out of the game isn't counterplay, it's removing an asset from the game because there's no lack of counterplay. It's taking the whole situation out of the game for both sides, which is terrible.
-
Local High School Star
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
Originally Posted by Spurs5Rings2014
If anything the 2 minute restriction is blatantly biased towards players who can't shoot FT's. Why should scrubs who can't hit their free throws be given a clutch?
Why should they get intentionally fouled if they didn't have the ball? Why do teams get a clutch by using this strategy and not having to play defense at all?
-
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
Originally Posted by TheCalmInsanity
Basically, there's no counterplay to it.
In every game, there must be balance. You are allowed to use strategies but the other team must be allowed to counter them.
Take for example Rondo on the Celtics who couldn't shoot outside shots. The strategy is to sag off and invite him to shoot. The counter? Rondo chooses not to shoot.
In the Hack-a-Shaq strategy, you have literally no choice but to shoot. You're literally forced into your weakness.
So how come players who have other weaknesses (can't dribble, can't shoot, etc) can choose to not dribble or not shoot even if the opposing team dares them to, while bad free throw shooters can be sent to the line against their will?
no you just don't play guys who can't shoot free throws. It's the easiest thing to counter ever.
-
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
it doesnt even work. this has been proven countless times
even if youre a 50% free throw shooter. youl make 1 out of 2 each time up the floor
thats 2 points every 2 possessions
which is 50% fg's
most teams hope to hit 50% of their shots
Depends on the timing of the game, there's also a huge variance and the hope is that there's oh man i forget my stats, leprskopic or whatever skews the data to the left and thus means when guys do well they do really well and the median is lower than the mean. Not sure I've seen the data though.
-
Banned
Re: The reason I think "Hack-a-Shaq" must be changed
Making them is a counter, which has no counter so youre wrong dumbass fagggot bitch.
opposing players cant block free throws.
dumbass
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|