-
Re: Nets sign Bargnani. No, I'm not making it up.
-
Since 1974
Re: Nets sign Bargnani. No, I'm not making it up.
Originally Posted by outbreak
In all seriousness I agree, I don't think he's as terrible as people make out if used in the right situation for the right price. The problems he's had are that he's been paid like a top level starter when he's more of a mismatch bench player.
All talent aside, the kid has zero hunger and is busted mentally. You really want a player like this?
I did not think he was worth a first round, but I was willing to see if he would try to turn his value around in NYC. He was a terrible disappointment.
-
Since 1974
Re: Nets sign Bargnani. No, I'm not making it up.
Originally Posted by niko
It's Bargs world, now Nets fans live it in.
"IT'S AN AB 3!"
-
Re: Nets sign Bargnani. No, I'm not making it up.
Originally Posted by Dr. Cheesesteak
No link...
Anyway, if true, guess it's kind of a relief? Now Kings can target Psycho T!!!!
There are no more stretch bigs left in FAcy, right? I was hoping Kings would get Teletovic...
hansborough next to cousins would be ****ing amazing
-
Flat Earth Era
Re: Nets sign Bargnani. No, I'm not making it up.
Originally Posted by niko
The Nets right now have no traditional bigs backing up Brook Lopez.
Not many teams have traditional bigs backing up centers nowadays
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|