-
NBA Legend
First time since 2004
That a scoring champion missed the playoffs.
Congrats Westbrook.
-
Knicks all da way
Re: First time since 2004
Even without making the playoffs, he'll still have a better playoffs than Harden.
Congrats Harden.
-
Re: First time since 2004
OP constantly shits on players with huge fanbases yet he is still in the green.He wont learn until all us stans merge and neg bomb him
-
Laker Gang #COYG
Re: First time since 2004
Originally Posted by Hit_Em
OP constantly shits on players with huge fanbases yet he is still in the green.He wont learn until all us stans merge and neg bomb him
Who are you?
-
Banned
Re: First time since 2004
Originally Posted by Hit_Em
OP constantly shits on players with huge fanbases yet he is still in the green.He wont learn until all us stans merge and neg bomb him
ok,help me get in the green
-
infamous souvlaki
Re: First time since 2004
Originally Posted by imdaman99
Even without making the playoffs, he'll still have a better playoffs than Harden.
Congrats Harden.
lol
-
NBA Legend
Re: First time since 2004
Originally Posted by Hit_Em
OP constantly shits on players with huge fanbases yet he is still in the green.He wont learn until all us stans merge and neg bomb him
Is it shitting on him if its a fact?
Just passing along an interesting tidbit for today.
-
Re: First time since 2004
In Westbrook's case it's not for lack of trying.. He was a beast this season, night in and out that guy came to play
-
Serious playground baller
Re: First time since 2004
-
Re: First time since 2004
Originally Posted by L.A.Showtime
Empty stats?
More like taking over the team.
-
NBA Legend
Re: First time since 2004
Originally Posted by gts
In Westbrook's case it's not for lack of trying.. He was a beast this season, night in and out that guy came to play
There's is truth to this.
That was always a knock on Kobe. And while Westbrook could put up 50 shooting 45%, its the fact that his teammates are not involved in the process. Yes, he averaged a bunch of assists. He was a do it all player. Arguably the best in the league statistically, but you have to get your teammates involved.
The worst thing in the world as a teammate of a chucker is not knowing when youll get the ball again, and not playing on defense.
Guys get it in their head, Westbrook is doing it all, and slowly that mindset creeps onto the defensive end.
Basketball is a team game. Always has been, always will be. You win as a team.
I commend Westbrook on his outstanding season, but if it doesnt translate to success, he needs to try something different.
-
Re: First time since 2004
Originally Posted by UK2K
There's is truth to this.
That was always a knock on Kobe. And while Westbrook could put up 50 shooting 45%, its the fact that his teammates are not involved in the process. Yes, he averaged a bunch of assists. He was a do it all player. Arguably the best in the league statistically, but you have to get your teammates involved.
The worst thing in the world as a teammate of a chucker is not knowing when youll get the ball again, and not playing on defense.
Guys get it in their head, Westbrook is doing it all, and slowly that mindset creeps onto the defensive end.
Basketball is a team game. Always has been, always will be. You win as a team.
I commend Westbrook on his outstanding season, but if it doesnt translate to success, he needs to try something different.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Doesn't translate into success?
The Thunder went 3-12 (20% winning percentage would be the worst in basketball ) with the worst offense in the league (99.9 ORTG) without him.
They went 40-26 (61% win percentage would be the equivalent of 51 wins) with a top 5 offense (110.5 ORTG) in the league with him, and that's with a ridiculous amount of injuries and a bunch of role-players surrounding him.
And then you bring up Bryant, the guy with 5 rings and 7 Finals appearances.
Your entire post is narrative-driven nonsense with absolutely nothing to back it up.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: First time since 2004
They had the same record as the 8th seed in the West, that is New Orleans. Would have been the 6th seed in the East, all of this without the best player in the world, and the 3rd best player on their team. Dude almost carried a much worse supporting cast than Harden to the 8th seed in the West, WHILE starting the season 3-12.
If they made the 8th seed, we wouldn't even be having this discussion right now.
GOATbrook gon GOAT.
-
NBA Legend
Re: First time since 2004
Originally Posted by Jacks3
You have no idea what you're talking about. Doesn't translate into success?
The Thunder went 3-12 (20% winning percentage would be the worst in basketball ) with the worst offense in the league (99.9 ORTG) without him.
They went 40-26 (61% win percentage would be the equivalent of 51 wins) with a top 5 offense (110.5 ORTG) in the league with him, and that's with a ridiculous amount of injuries and a bunch of role-players surrounding him.
And then you bring up Bryant, the guy with 5 rings and 7 Finals appearances.
Your entire post is narrative-driven nonsense with absolutely nothing to back it up.
Success is making the playoffs.
Clearly, his play didn't translate to a successful season.
Would you consider this season a success for OKC?
-
NBA Legend
Re: First time since 2004
Originally Posted by Fudge
They had the same record as the 8th seed in the West, that is New Orleans. Would have been the 6th seed in the East, all of this without the best player in the world, and the 3rd best player on their team. Dude almost carried a much worse supporting cast than Harden to the 8th seed in the West, WHILE starting the season 3-12.
If they made the 8th seed, we wouldn't even be having this discussion right now.
GOATbrook gon GOAT.
Obviously, because the statement in the OP would be false.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|