-
Local High School Star
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by SamuraiSWISH
What happened to Westbitch with his stacked roster against rookie Donovan Mitchell?
Do you really compare with losing 2-4 against 5th seed team and losing 0-4 againts 6th seed team.
What about 10 rounds vs 2 rounds?
-
Coach
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by LeCola
Do you really compare with losing 2-4 against 5th seed team and losing 0-4 againts 6th seed team.
What about 10 rounds vs 2 rounds?
I
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Much smarter and more skilled. Its the ben simmons effect...Russell is better, but he's in the same mold.
-
Banned
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by STATUTORY
I'm talking about whether regular season statistics have any value in player evaluation, the fact that Westbrook had much better regular season stats and it does not predict playoff performances at all is just proof for my argument.
imagine being this obtuse
Bulshit nice try though. You said nothing about regular-season vs postseason in your initial post. Agenda fail. Come back better.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by SamuraiSWISH
It’s definitely a microcosm in essence of the LeBron vs Kobe debate but in smaller sized guys at the PG position.
It’s so funny seeing Bruce Blitz who championed the former and hated the latter ... has now basically flipped his entire stance.
This year spoke volumes in terms of lebrons ability to fit, and west competition. Basically a vindication of all past criticism.
There's absolutely no way hes better than kobe at basketball.
-
Bear Chested Da Brawn
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by tpols
This year spoke volumes in terms of lebrons ability to fit, and west competition. Basically a vindication of all past criticism.
There's absolutely no way hes better than kobe at basketball.
The failures of Westbrook, Ben Simmons, and to a lesser extent James Harden in the playoffs is a direct rebuke to Lebron's basketball style and legacy as well
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by STATUTORY
The failures of Westbrook, Ben Simmons, and to a lesser extent James Harden in the playoffs is a direct rebuke to Lebron's basketball style and legacy as well
Hardens a cheapskate but he's still an elite shooter. Its the combination of being a ball dominate and not being able to shoot that is really crippling to teamwork and growth. John wall is another example. Beal is way way better.
-
Banned
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by tpols
This year spoke volumes in terms of lebrons ability to fit, and west competition. Basically a vindication of all past criticism.
There's absolutely no way hes better than kobe at basketball.
LeBron is consensus top 3. Kobe is consensus top 15. I mean...
-
... on a leash
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by tpols
This year spoke volumes in terms of lebrons ability to fit, and west competition. Basically a vindication of all past criticism.
There's absolutely no way hes better than kobe at basketball.
the convincing oneself is strong in this one
-
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by SpaceJam2
Makes thread about how stats are not important
Player with better stats is winning the series
Cant make this up
Dame: 30-5-4- 3 on 45%, 47% 3p ( 21.8 GmSc)
Westbrook: 19- 10- 10-.5 on 35%, 10% 3p (13.2 GmSc)
Are you trying to prove that stats matter because that's what you did
Dame is shooting 10% better with 11 ppg more and nearly double the GmSc
But rebounds and assists doe
-
Lol
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by tpols
This year spoke volumes in terms of lebrons ability to fit, and west competition. Basically a vindication of all past criticism.
There's absolutely no way hes better than kobe at basketball.
2005 and 2013 spoke volumes about Kobe’s ability to fit and west competition.
There’s no way he’s better than LeBron at basketball.
-
truth serum
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
What Russ brings outside of scoring is relatively consistent, you can expect that impact game in, game out. His shootings another story. Dame does the scoring pretty well but honestly he's hit and miss himself, just to a lesser degree than Russ and doesn't bring those other things to the table. It's a matter of preference.
Sheep seeing the light
More like Stan getting insecure. It's plain to see.
-
I go HAM
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by sdot_thadon
What Russ brings outside of scoring is relatively consistent, you can expect that impact game in, game out. His shootings another story. Dame does the scoring pretty well but honestly he's hit and miss himself, just to a lesser degree than Russ and doesn't bring those other things to the table. It's a matter of preference.
More like Stan getting insecure. It's plain to see.
+1 High IQ
-
Bran Fam Member
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by RRR3
2005 and 2013 spoke volumes about Kobe’s ability to fit and west competition.
There’s no way he’s better than LeBron at basketball.
What about 08-12 Kobe with a fringe all-star and some depth around him? Top 3 seed every year..
2013 Kobe won 45 games with one all-star teammate and an injured roster, and that's 17th season Kobe with 0 depth and d-leaguers starting around him. Only time he missed Playoffs in the West was when he got injured and/or was way past his prime on a rebuilding team that kept him around for ratings.
16th season Lebron elevated a 35-win team to 37 wins. Congratulations.
-
Lol
Re: Only boxscore watchers are surprised that Liliard>Westbrook
Originally Posted by ImKobe
What about 08-12 Kobe with a fringe all-star and some depth around him? Top 3 seed every year..
2013 Kobe won 45 games with one all-star teammate and an injured roster, and that's 17th season Kobe with 0 depth and d-leaguers starting around him.
16th season Lebron elevated a 35-win team to 37 wins. Congratulations.
Who the hell had better rosters than the Lakers in those years before the Heat formed? Classic Kobetard revisionism.
Lol at 2013 being a positive for Kobe. You
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|