-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: The Spurs are overrated in the annals of history
Originally Posted by Kawhi m8
Yeah look, having the highest wining % in all US sports is some what dominant, in my eyes.
They're not overrated.
You've just overrated them to suit the agenda of your thread.
The Spurs teams were the same caliber as any other one-off winner - so not good enough to be a dynasty - except the Spurs maintained their one-off caliber for 15 years..
again, one-off champions aren't nearly as good or impressive as a dynasties
-
RENT FREE
Re: The Spurs are overrated in the annals of history
Originally Posted by 3ball
The Spurs teams were the same caliber as any other one-off winner - so not good enough to be a dynasty - except the Spurs maintained their one-off caliber for 15 years..
again, one-off champions aren't nearly as good or impressive as a dynasties
No ones calling them a dynasty...
-
Re: The Spurs are overrated in the annals of history
Originally Posted by 3ball
The Spurs teams were the same caliber as any other one-off winner - so not good enough to be a dynasty - except the Spurs maintained their one-off caliber for 15 years..
again, one-off champions aren't nearly as good or impressive as a dynasties
LOL. 5 titles = 1 title.
Holy shit you're brilliant.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|