Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678
Results 106 to 112 of 112
  1. #106
    Dont H8 the Laker H8er glidedrxlr22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    lakers r done
    Posts
    4,969

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    As a laker hater I'm glad the Lakers rejected this deal cause Beasley is exactly what LA needs right now. He'd step right into the starting SF spot. I'm surprised cause the lakers usually pony up the cash to improve. Perhaps they're waiting on something bigger....they could still revisit the Beasley offer though.

  2. #107
    soundcloud.com/agua-1 andgar923's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    18,568

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    Quote Originally Posted by RazorBaLade
    http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/s...ichael-beasley

    The Minnesota Timberwolves offered to trade Michael Beasley to the Los Angeles Lakers for a first-round draft pick, but the Lakers turned them down, according to a league source. Since there is a dollar-for-dollar penalty for tax-paying teams, taking on Beasley's $6.2 million contract would add another $6.2 million to their tax bill and cost the Lakers an extra $12.4 million.


    I DO NOT WANT JIM BUSS ANY MORE
    Good for them, I would never take Beasley.

  3. #108
    Banned liquidrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    993

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    How would a ball-stopping F help them? Beasley isn't what they need. They need a freaking PG. Putting Beasley on their second unit would be a disaster as he heaved time and time again anytime he got the ball.
    The dude sucks and isn't worth a 1st Rnd pick.


    Yeah a .440% shooting big man avg's 12 a game who can't defend and rebound and chucks is worth a 1st Rnd pick. The guy is lucky he was the 2nd overall pick, otherwise he'd be in the d league by now.

  4. #109
    Lol RRR3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    47,654

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    Quote Originally Posted by liquidrage
    How would a ball-stopping F help them? Beasley isn't what they need. They need a freaking PG. Putting Beasley on their second unit would be a disaster as he heaved time and time again anytime he got the ball.
    The dude sucks and isn't worth a 1st Rnd pick.


    Yeah a .440% shooting big man avg's 12 a game who can't defend and rebound and chucks is worth a 1st Rnd pick. The guy is lucky he was the 2nd overall pick, otherwise he'd be in the d league by now.
    Beasley can definitely rebound WTF you talking about. He's not a beast rebounder or anything, but if he's playing the 3, he's definitely above average in that regard/ He's been injured and hasn't played as much this year, and yeah, he certainly has his issues, but you're underrating the **** out of him. He's not a bad player. He averaged 19/6/2 in only 32 minutes a game last season. For his career, he averages 20/7/2 per 36 minutes.

  5. #110
    7-time NBA All-Star Droid101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    12,701

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    Quote Originally Posted by liquidrage
    How would a ball-stopping F help them? Beasley isn't what they need. They need a freaking PG.
    No. The Lakers need a PG and a SF.

    Our starting PG is shooting 25% from three.

    Our starting SF is shooting 20% from three.

    The Lakers improve MASSIVELY if they upgrade one or both of those positions, period.

  6. #111
    Banned liquidrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    993

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    Quote Originally Posted by RRR3
    Beasley can definitely rebound WTF you talking about. He's not a beast rebounder or anything, but if he's playing the 3, he's definitely above average in that regard/ He's been injured and hasn't played as much this year, and yeah, he certainly has his issues, but you're underrating the **** out of him. He's not a bad player. He averaged 19/6/2 in only 32 minutes a game last season. For his career, he averages 20/7/2 per 36 minutes.

    He is a bad player. He was allowed to chuck. The league is full of guys that can score 19 a game when given minutes and the freedom to shoot a lot. He averaged 7 makes on 17 shots a game last year.

    He was like the 80th ranked forward last year in PER. And he can't defend. There's a reason he's falling out of the MINNESOTA rotation and they want to move him while they're competing for a playoff spot.

  7. #112
    Banned liquidrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    993

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    Quote Originally Posted by Droid101
    No. The Lakers need a PG and a SF.

    Our starting PG is shooting 25% from three.

    Our starting SF is shooting 20% from three.

    The Lakers improve MASSIVELY if they upgrade one or both of those positions, period.
    You have 3 scorers in the starting lineup already. Starting Beasley would add another defensive liability and he aint getting touches. Without touches what impact does he have except bad defense? When on Earth is he going to get touches over Kobe or Paul and Bynum?

    The only impact Beasley would have is coming off the bench to add scoring to the second unit. And that's not worth a 1st round pick, especially when you combine blah shooting, flow stopping, no defense to that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •