Page 3 of 20 FirstFirst 12345613 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 293

Thread: The 2016 Thread

  1. #31
    7-time NBA All-Star Droid101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    12,701

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Well... I don't pay my own cell phone bill technically. My job buys it for me. So I guess you were right about something for once.

  2. #32
    Hustle Loyalty Respect Knicks101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CENATION
    Posts
    39,428

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Jobbed to this man Maivia.

  3. #33
    Perfectly Calm, Dude KevinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    10,703

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by MightyWhitey
    Wow what liberal nonsense you post. So just because someone is more successful they should be penalized more? And where will these taxes go? Maybe you can tell me kev because I personally find it ludicrous to go after people in America who made something of their lives. The buzz words income inequality are as sharp as a dull blade and cut like a spoon. Is this not America where making yourself successful for you and your family the key ingredient to what makes this nations gears run smoothly? Lets get a hold of the limousine liberals in Hollywood who think it's cool to be a democrat because that's the flavor of the month and see if they are willing to pay these taxes. Of course We never get that story.
    Quote Originally Posted by MightyWhitey
    So Kev how essential are these estate taxes to the USA? I'm curious to know where and what these taxes are used for and why? I am also curious as to why is it the governments business if I leave my children my estate that they have to be taxed? Why is a liberal like yourself pro big government and anti freedom? This is a serious question I have for liberals.
    Um, Chewing was saying that the Democrats don't about the poor or income equality.
    I posted to an editorial from the Communist Daily Worker, ooops, I mean, USA Today, showing what the actual priorities of Congressional Republicans who were pushing a speedy vote to repeal a tax that doesn't even apply to the 1%. No, they want repeal a tax that applies only to the top two tenths of the 1%. Or to put it another way, a tax that is not levied on 99.8% of estates.



    So you don't know how taxes work?
    You don't know what taxes are used for?
    Do you think this is a new tax?
    You do know the estate tax has existed 99 years now right? And it has been levied on Hollywood types and any one else in the upper echelon for a century now?
    Also this is a not a tax paid by a taxpayer, the tax payer is dead. It's paid by the estate and it no taxes at all are paid on the first $5.34 million dollars on the estate. So let's say you're an only child whose parents die in a car accident and after funeral costs, charitable deductions, etc have an estate of worth $11 million dollars.

    Mazel Tov, after the estate tax is paid, you just inherited 10.896 million dollars.

  4. #34
    Perfectly Calm, Dude KevinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    10,703

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Meanwhile votes that are not happening in Congress include confirming the incoming Attorney General and War Resolution against ISIS.

  5. #35
    Hustle Loyalty Respect Knicks101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CENATION
    Posts
    39,428

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The Macho Man
    Maivia more than a man
    That's true, when this legend running for President?

  6. #36
    Local High School Star MightyWhitey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    nYc
    Posts
    1,058

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by KevinNYC
    Um, Chewing was saying that the Democrats don't about the poor or income equality.
    I posted to an editorial from the Communist Daily Worker, ooops, I mean, USA Today, showing what the actual priorities of Congressional Republicans who were pushing a speedy vote to repeal a tax that doesn't even apply to the 1%. No, they want repeal a tax that applies only to the top two tenths of the 1%. Or to put it another way, a tax that is not levied on 99.8% of estates.



    So you don't know how taxes work?
    You don't know what taxes are used for?
    Do you think this is a new tax?
    You do know the estate tax has existed 99 years now right? And it has been levied on Hollywood types and any one else in the upper echelon for a century now?
    Also this is a not a tax paid by a taxpayer, the tax payer is dead. It's paid by the estate and it no taxes at all are paid on the first $5.34 million dollars on the estate. So let's say you're an only child whose parents die in a car accident and after funeral costs, charitable deductions, etc have an estate of worth $11 million dollars.

    Mazel Tov, after the estate tax is paid, you just inherited 10.896 million dollars.
    I don't care if it existed for 200 years it's a useless tax just like the carbon tax. Maybe you can tell me why liberals like yourself are pro big government and are anti freedom? Why is such a tax so important for you to post about yet you avoid the one tax Obama imposed through obamacare?

  7. #37
    Perfectly Calm, Dude KevinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    10,703

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by MightyWhitey
    I don't care if it existed for 200 years it's a useless tax just like the carbon tax. Maybe you can tell me why liberals like yourself are pro big government and are anti freedom? Why is such a tax so important for you to post about yet you avoid the one tax Obama imposed through obamacare?
    Perhaps you should educate yourself on why the estate tax exists.

    It's basically a democratic tool to prevent an entrenched aristocracy.

  8. #38
    National High School Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,153

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The Macho Man
    You encounter war mongers in your daily life? That's fvkin weird
    Yup, easily identifiable by their "bomb muslims" foreign policy views. I'm surprised you haven't?

  9. #39
    National High School Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,153

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The Macho Man
    Never met anyone who said that in real life
    Don't know how to help you buddy.

    Maybe go out more often instead of posting here all day?

  10. #40
    7-time NBA All-Star Droid101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    12,701

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by KevinNYC
    Also this is a not a tax paid by a taxpayer, the tax payer is dead. It's paid by the estate and it no taxes at all are paid on the first $5.34 million dollars on the estate. So let's say you're an only child whose parents die in a car accident and after funeral costs, charitable deductions, etc have an estate of worth $11 million dollars.

    Mazel Tov, after the estate tax is paid, you just inherited 10.896 million dollars.
    Is that accurate? You're saying that of the money past 5.34 mil, it's only taxed at 1.8% or so?

    That's ****ing loony. It needs to be at least 20% or more.

    Unless you were just estimating, in which case carry on.

  11. #41
    Perfectly Calm, Dude KevinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    10,703

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Droid101
    Is that accurate? You're saying that of the money past 5.34 mil, it's only taxed at 1.8% or so?

    That's ****ing loony. It needs to be at least 20% or more.

    Unless you were just estimating, in which case carry on.
    No, it's a 40% tax. But on an $11 million estate, not very much is taxed because, in this case the 5.34 million exemption is doubled because each parent gets to exclude 5.34 million. So only about 300,000 is taxable. In my example, I had them both die in the same accident to get that double exemption, but, as I look this up, you don't even need to do this. The double exemption is now part of the law. Even if one spouse dies before the other, you can still keep that 5 million buck exemption. Essentially, they simplified and standardized one form of estate planning that folks were already doing.

    So if the husband dies and leaves all of his 20 million estate to his wife, there's no estate tax because spouses are exempt. If a couple of years later the wife dies, there will be an estate tax, but you can exclude 5.3 for husband and 5.3 for the wife. So the first 10.68 million is tax free and then it's a 40% tax on the estate. So a the effective tax rate in this example is 18.64% of the entire estate. If the estate was worth 200 million, the effective tax rate would be 37.8%

    Starting for deaths in 2011, and now going forward, widows and widowers can add any unused exclusion of the spouse who died most recently to their own $5.34 million tax-free amount. The sum carried over is called the “deceased spousal unused exclusion amount.” In common parlance it has since become known by the short-hand, “the DSUE amount.”

    This enables couples together to transfer up to $10.68 million tax-free. It also eliminates the need in many cases for the tax-planning gyrations that lawyers routinely recommended to preserve each spouse’s estate tax exemption amount.

    Portability, as tax geeks call it (though that term does not actually appear in the American Taxpayer Relief Tax Act Of 2012 or ATRA), doesn’t change the fact that you can give an unlimited amount to your spouse, during life or through your estate plan (provided she or he is a U.S. citizen) with no tax applied–this is the unlimited marital deduction. But until portability became part of the law, without proper planning, when the second spouse died anything above the exempt amount not going to charity would be taxed. In other words, the first spouse’s exemption would be lost. Bypass trusts (also called family trusts or credit-shelter trusts) addressed that problem.
    Last edited by KevinNYC; 04-16-2015 at 06:06 PM.

  12. #42
    7-time NBA All-Star Droid101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    12,701

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Ah you're right I mis-read. Still painfully low.

  13. #43
    pronouns - he/haw Nanners's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    11,010

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The Macho Man
    Where are you hanging out that you meet these people

    Probably shouldn't hang out there. Sounds shitty
    have you never been to the midwest or something? i used to live in oklahoma and these types of people were f[COLOR="Black"]u[/COLOR]cking everywhere.

  14. #44
       
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    13,095

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Nanners
    have you never been to the midwest or something? i used to live in oklahoma and these types of people were f[COLOR="Black"]u[/COLOR]cking everywhere.
    you sound miserable and lost at the moment, but i hope things pick up for you.

  15. #45
    pronouns - he/haw Nanners's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    11,010

    Default Re: The 2016 Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by gigantes
    you sound miserable and lost at the moment, but i hope things pick up for you.
    what? you think i sound miserable and lost because when i lived in the midwest i witnessed people say they want to bomb muslims???

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •