Why is Kobe not top 10 alltime?

[zay_24]

PISTONS? The same exact team nearly swept an LA team with Payton, Kobe, Malone, and Shaq?

The same Lakers who had injury problems?

The same lakers who weren't any where near 100%

And dont try it, the 2010 celtics>>05 pistons

Pistons were a known defensive powerhouse, but the celtics were not only better defensively, but wayyyy better offensively as well.

Knock it off kid

[Ruh-Roh]

PISTONS? The same exact team nearly swept an LA team with Payton, Kobe, Malone, and Shaq?

^^Pay the man.

[Poochymama]

PISTONS? The same exact team nearly swept an LA team with Payton, Kobe, Malone, and Shaq?

This

[New York Knicks]

The same Lakers who had injury problems?

The same lakers who weren't any where near 100%

And dont try it, the 2010 celtics>>05 pistons

Pistons were a known defensive powerhouse, but the celtics were not only better defensively, but wayyyy better offensively as well.

Knock it off kid

And the excuses start rolling. Kobe fans lol. Constantly revising history to fit their agenda.

And BTW, the Pistons were ranked 3rd defensively that year. The Celtics were ranked 5th.

[Showtime]

Honestly, i have not seen ONE good argument as to why kobe is NOT top 10 alltime.

Someone who disagrees with Kobe being top 10 alltime please come in here and tell me why.

The best argument there is is that 10 other players have done as much or more, or played the game as a level as high or better.

[Big#50]

The same Lakers who had injury problems?

The same lakers who weren't any where near 100%

And dont try it, the 2010 celtics>>05 pistons

Pistons were a known defensive powerhouse, but the celtics were not only better defensively, but wayyyy better offensively as well.

Knock it off kid

Which piece of sht Kobe troll got banned recently?

[zay_24]

And the excuses start rolling. Kobe fans lol. Constantly revising history to fit their agenda.

And BTW, the Pistons were ranked 3rd defensively that year. The Celtics were ranked 5th.

So, im making an excuse by saying the lakers werent at 100%

[New York Knicks]

The best argument there is is that 10 other players have done as much or more, or played the game as a level as high or better.

Accolade-wise, Kobe has a Top 10 r

[Bring-Your-Js]

Kobe's Playoff Numbers as 'The Man':

2006: 27.9 ppg/6.3 rpg/5.1 apg/50%
2007: 32.8 ppg/5.2 rpg/4.1 apg/46%
2008: 30.1 ppg/5.7 rpg/5.5 apg/48%
2009: 30.2 ppg/5.3 rpg/5.1 apg/46%
2010: 29.2 ppg/6.0 rpg/5.5 apg/46%

[New York Knicks]

So, im making an excuse by saying the lakers werent at 100%

You're making an excuse on why the Lakers lost. Shaq, Kobe, and Payton should be enough to beat anyone. Shaq shot 60% that series from the field. Kobe? 38%.

[Mr Clutch Melo]

hmm,

Final MVPS- duncan, kobe & hakeem= tied

MVP-Duncan, Kobe & hakeem= tied

Rings- Kobe, duncan, hakeem

Finals appearances- kobe, Duncan, Hakeem
Duncan has never defeated a team in the finals like the modern day celtics. So yea...

Scoring titles- Kobe 2, hakeem nd duncan 0
Rebound titles- Hakeem 2- kobe and duncan 0
Kobe is a better scorer and passer than both
Kobe is a better winner than both

81 point games- kobe 1, duncan and hakeem 0

who broke the record for most 3's made in a game?

Who gave the spurs the most trouble in the early 2000s?

So you think Kobe>>>>Russell,Jordan,Kareem, Bird, Shaq ? You bring up the 81 point game

Kobe is not a better passer than Hakeem and Duncan. Hakeem/Duncan were both ELITE passers at their posistion, something Kobe has never been.

Shaq gave the Spurs most trouble in the early 2000s, Kobe just riding Shaqs greatness and dominance.

Kobe is the WORST finals performer of the top-10, do I need to even bring up 2004 ? Or 2008 ? Even this years finals where Kobe shot brick after brick.

[Batz]

[QUOTE=New York Knicks]Accolade-wise, Kobe has a Top 10 r

[triangleoffense]

And now this has become a troll thread... I tried to steer in the other direction, honest I did!

[zay_24]

So you think Kobe>>>>Russell,Jordan,Kareem, Bird, Shaq ? You bring up the 81 point game

Kobe is not a better passer than Hakeem and Duncan. Hakeem/Duncan were both ELITE passers at their posistion, something Kobe has never been.

Shaq gave the Spurs most trouble in the early 2000s, Kobe just riding Shaqs greatness and dominance.

Kobe is the WORST finals performer of the top-10, do I need to even bring up 2004 ? Or 2008 ? Even this years finals where Kobe shot brick after brick.

lol, i dont respond to people who try to flip arguments, when you respond to me you respond to the WHOLE post, not 1 line lol, you fail

[New York Knicks]

35/5/5 in the best defensive era statistacally and on a crap ass team is average? Just stop and go actually try to be a knicks fan because wow...

Take your own advice and stay out of Kobe threads then?

And definitely not the best defensive era if they had to modify the rules to help perimeter players and Kobe still couldn't manage to even shoot above his career average. He averaged 10+ FTA/gm despite taking nearly 80% of his FGs from the perimeter. Try again.