Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    Bay Areaaaaaaaaaaa! DavisWarriorsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    616

    Default Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    CP3 and the Clippers seem to play better when Griffin isn't on the floor with them. Blake the ball stopper like Carmelo.

  2. #2
    with God-given ass JimmyMcAdocious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    7,888

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    Didn't the Clippers do the same after Paul was injured last season?

  3. #3
    Brooklyn LoneyROY7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    14,717

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?


  4. #4
    Curry fam navy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    15,095

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    Who's more underrated, Chris Paul or Doc Rivers?

  5. #5
    Brooklyn LoneyROY7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    14,717

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    Quote Originally Posted by navy
    Who's more underrated, Chris Paul or Doc Rivers?
    Austin Rivers.

  6. #6
    College superstar keep-itreal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,718

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    that's because Blake Griffin can't do anything except dunking

  7. #7
    NBA Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    17,126

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    Quote Originally Posted by navy
    Who's more underrated, Chris Paul or Doc Rivers?

    Donald Sterling

  8. #8
    RIP P Young X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,692

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyMcAdocious
    Didn't the Clippers do the same after Paul was injured last season?
    Difference is they're beating elite teams this year, they beat nothing but below .500 teams and lost to every good team they faced when CP went out last year.

    And no, they're not better without Blake, they have absolutely no chance of doing anything without him in the playoffs. You're never better when you replace a top 10 ish player with Spencer ****ing Hawes.

  9. #9
    The Deciders Im so nba'd out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    It’s our league now…
    Posts
    8,480

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    Op Kill Yourself

  10. #10
    Induuubitably Done_And_Done's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Places
    Posts
    9,273

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    What the hell are you talking about. They're 5 and 5 over their last 10. You make it seem as though this they're on a tear right now.

  11. #11
    shhhhhhh
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Downtown Hoops Dojo
    Posts
    28,557

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    They're not better they are different and this version isn't too bad either..

    We'll see more as the sample size grows larger and teams start making adjustments...

    it's been what 4 games 5?

    edit: 7 games 4-3 without him
    Last edited by gts; 02-27-2015 at 11:55 PM.

  12. #12
    Good college starter Darius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Handsome Man
    Posts
    3,101

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    Quote Originally Posted by Done_And_Done
    What the hell are you talking about. They're 5 and 5 over their last 10. You make it seem as though this they're on a tear right now.
    Yeah 5-5 but with these opponents:

    Chi, OKC, Hou, Mem, Mem, Sac, Dal, Cle, Tor, SAS

    Basically all top playoff teams.

    But, no, they aren't better.
    Last edited by Darius; 02-27-2015 at 11:56 PM.

  13. #13
    NBA Legend kuniva_dAMiGhTy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    16,648

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    Quote Originally Posted by navy
    Who's more underrated, Chris Paul or Doc Rivers?
    Wait. Doc Rivers is underrated?

  14. #14
    70p game: DBook-1 MJ-0 livingby3's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,128

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    Op is right. We will do the Clippers a favor. Suns will trade their two best players in Bledsoe n Markieff for BG

  15. #15
    Game. Set. Match. bdreason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    HB, CA
    Posts
    24,875

    Default Re: Chris Paul and The Clippers Better Without Blake Griffin?

    It has more to do with playing Blake and Jordan at the same time. Without Blake, the Clippers only put one guy on the box, and are able to spread the court. Think about the kind of shots Blake has been taking this season... mostly long jumpers.


    Also, offense has never been an issue for the Clippers, and that's mainly what Blake brings to the table. Honestly, this Clippers team would probably struggle more if they lost Jordan, as he's the only guy on the team that's capable of protecting the rim.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •