-
What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
??
If Clveland gave away 2 first round picks for a Mosgov what would they have given up if Phil Jackson Kept chandler till the deadline
Or from GS? Okc?
Last edited by christian1923; 01-08-2015 at 08:24 PM.
-
Banned
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
Originally Posted by christian1923
??
If Clveland gave away 2 first round picks for a euro what would they have given up if Phil Jackson Kept chandler till the deadline
Or from GS? Okc?
Excellent question.
If they had Chandler, another 4 more wins at least.
-
SexLand
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
Originally Posted by hawkfan
Excellent question.
If they had Chandler, another 4 more wins at least.
That wasn't the question.
-
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
Originally Posted by Uncle Drew
That wasn't the question.
Knicks probably could have gotten Thompson & filler & the 2 first rounds
-
tr
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
B-but Phil Jackson FLEECED the Mavs! We didn't need to keep Tyson! He had no value! Basketball genius! Why else would he have to go on twitter to defend the trade?
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
Originally Posted by christian1923
Knicks probably could have gotten Thompson & filler & the 2 first rounds
That's a pretty huge filler considering that Tyson makes like 7x what Mozgov makes.
Tyson was moved so that Felton could be unloaded as well. He played like shit last year too. His value has increased because he is playing well now. Hindsight is 20/20.
-
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
That's a pretty huge filler considering that Tyson makes like 7x what Mozgov makes.
Tyson was moved so that Felton could be unloaded as well. He played like shit last year too. His value has increased because he is playing well now. Hindsight is 20/20.
True, but chandlers value would have been high regardless.
He's healthy
He's a center who rim protects
he's an expiring contract
It's irks me that Denver got 2 first rounders for mosgov and we got no picks
-
The Paterfamilias
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
Originally Posted by christian1923
True, but chandlers value would have been high regardless.
He's healthy
He's a center who rim protects
he's an expiring contract
It's irks me that Denver got 2 first rounders for mosgov and we got no picks
He's also 32, while Mozgov is 28. Add to that, he's on a contract that pays him for what he is at his best, while Mozgov has an incredibly team-friendly contract. And, then there's the Blatt connection with Mozgov.
Chandler has maybe a couple good seasons left in him... maybe.
I doubt he'd be worth all that much on the open market.
-
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
Originally Posted by RedBlackAttack
He's also 32, while Mozgov is 28. Add to that, he's on a contract that pays him for what he is at his best, while Mozgov has an incredibly team-friendly contract. And, then there's the Blatt connection with Mozgov.
Chandler has maybe a couple good seasons left in him... maybe.
I doubt he'd be worth all that much on the open market.
You don't think he'd be worth more now then in the offseason when all we got was Dalembert, Calderon, and Larkin?
It'd probably have to be a three team trade that I'm not creative enough to come up with myself
-
I rule the local playground
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
Originally Posted by christian1923
True, but chandlers value would have been high regardless.
He's healthy
He's a center who rim protects
he's an expiring contract
It's irks me that Denver got 2 first rounders for mosgov and we got no picks
Unless the Spurs call Phil Jackson and tell him who to pick, those picks aren't going to be likely worth anything.
-
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
Originally Posted by OnFire
Unless the Spurs call Phil Jackson and tell him who to pick, those picks aren't going to be likely worth anything.
Theyre still assets, it's not like the cavs are a 60 win team
-
I rule the local playground
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
Originally Posted by christian1923
Theyre still assets, it's not like the cavs are a 60 win team
They are worth so little that teams lose on purpose to not have to get those picks and give away players to get rid of them so they dont have to waste 800k in salary on that draft slot.
Cheer up :)
-
OH! Blocked By James!!
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
Originally Posted by Springsteen
B-but Phil Jackson FLEECED the Mavs! We didn't need to keep Tyson! He had no value! Basketball genius! Why else would he have to go on twitter to defend the trade?
haha no joke. mavs absolutely fleeced the knicks
they gave up a 11/12 center with elite defense for ellington (waived), dalembert (waived), calderon (looking to trade)
Fleeced. Good job Cuban!
-
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
Originally Posted by OnFire
They are worth so little that teams lose on purpose to not have to get those picks and give away players to get rid of them so they dont have to waste 800k in salary on that draft slot.
Cheer up :)
Whatre you talking about dude
-
I Run NY.
Re: What would the cavs have traded for Tyson Chandler
We dumped Tyson also to be worse this year. Knicks fans wanted us to keep Tyson, but they don't want the extra wins. We've become this myopic impatient fanbase, we might as well become Nets fans. Everything is taken in a vacuum.
Tyson's older, had 1 less year on deal, and makes twice as much as Mozgov. But i'm sure he'd have the same value, because if he didn't, why bitch?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|