-
1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
In 1989 MJ was the ringless, young star putting up monster stats. He was having a dominant playoffs up until that point averaging something like 36/8/8. Like present day ESPN when praising statistical feats by Kobe, Lebron, or Durant people in 1989 were acting as if nothing comparable to what MJ was doing had been done in history. So, in steps a "proto-ISHesque" journalist providing arguments as if it were 2015. Here are some highlights from the article:
"Jordan isn't playing any better now than Oscar Robertson or Elgin Baylor in their primes. Both had do-it-all myself, go-down-in-flames of glory streaks in the playoffs comparable to Jordan's. "
"Most important Jordan has not yet approached the level of dominance achieved by the NBA's three greatest players, all centers: Wilt Chamberlain, Bill Russell, and Kareem Abdul Jabbar."
Early advanced stats:
Let's use a simplified version of an old Red Auerbach system to give Jordan a total grade. Add up Jordan's points, rebounds, and assists, then subtract all his missed shots and free throws. On our Red meter Jordan has averaged a superb rating of 37.6 per game.
But in 1963...the Big O had a rating of 40.3...
Answering the weak era/ fewer teams criticism:
Before anyone jerks a knee and says, 'There weren't nearly as many good players then, let it be noted that the old NBA had only 9 teams not 25. Even rotten squads had good players at most positions...
Kareem as the bridge between the old and new eras:
For those who think that current players are a different breed, remember this: when Abdul Jabbar was an NBA puppy from 1969 to 1971, averaging 30 points and 15 rebounds, Chamberlain was an old man. Yet Wilt still averaged 20 rebounds per game, blocked more shots than Jabbar, had more assists, committed fewer fouls, shot a better floor percentage, and still averaged 20 points a game.
If old Chamberlain matched the young Jabbar, and the old Jabbar was good enough to start for back to back NBA champions, what would the young Wilt and Bill do to nice Brad Daugherty.
Link
The world of basketball debating hasn't changed in decades especially when it comes to comparing eras.
-
Laker Nation
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
eh. Simply adding up raw basic stats doesn't account for pace/minutes played.
-
Local High School Star
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
profesional fields improve with time man
back then, reporters got paid for that
now we come up with that kind of bull daily on this message board for free
-
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
Someone needs to do the Red Meter for Lebron and Kobe.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
Good find. I laughed at the adjacent article...
The Pistons have lost only one of nine playoff games but to hear Coach Chuck Daly talk, you would think Detroit is on the brink of elimination. "Hey, backs against the wall for real. The Bulls aren't here by accident, you know."
Gotta love Chuck Daly
Even die-hards knew the Pistons were prohibitive favorites in 89.
Last edited by Da_Realist; 01-27-2015 at 02:54 PM.
-
3-time NBA All-Star
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
Originally Posted by jlip
In 1989 MJ was the ringless, young star putting up monster stats. He was having a dominant playoffs up until that point averaging something like 36/8/8. Like present day ESPN when praising statistical feats by Kobe, Lebron, or Durant people in 1989 were acting as if nothing comparable to what MJ was doing had been done in history. So, in steps a "proto-ISHesque" journalist providing arguments as if it were 2015. Here are some highlights from the article:
" Jordan isn't playing any better now than Oscar Robertson or Elgin Baylor in their primes. Both had do-it-all myself, go-down-in-flames of glory streaks in the playoffs comparable to Jordan's. "
" Most important Jordan has not yet approached the level of dominance achieved by the NBA's three greatest players, all centers: Wilt Chamberlain, Bill Russell, and Kareem Abdul Jabbar."
Early advanced stats:
Let's use a simplified version of an old Red Auerbach system to give Jordan a total grade. Add up Jordan's points, rebounds, and assists, then subtract all his missed shots and free throws. On our Red meter Jordan has averaged a superb rating of 37.6 per game.
But in 1963...the Big O had a rating of 40.3...
Answering the weak era/ fewer teams criticism:
Before anyone jerks a knee and says, 'There weren't nearly as many good players then, let it be noted that the old NBA had only 9 teams not 25. Even rotten squads had good players at most positions...
Kareem as the bridge between the old and new eras:
For those who think that current players are a different breed, remember this: when Abdul Jabbar was an NBA puppy from 1969 to 1971, averaging 30 points and 15 rebounds, Chamberlain was an old man. Yet Wilt still averaged 20 rebounds per game, blocked more shots than Jabbar, had more assists, committed fewer fouls, shot a better floor percentage, and still averaged 20 points a game.
If old Chamberlain matched the young Jabbar, and the old Jabbar was good enough to start for back to back NBA champions, what would the young Wilt and Bill do to nice Brad Daugherty.
Link
The world of basketball debating hasn't changed in decades especially when it comes to comparing eras.
Wow, seems they had recruited young Lazeruss.
-
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
Originally Posted by Psileas
Wow, seems they had recruited young Lazeruss.
I thought the same thing.
-
Decent playground baller
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
Yeah, but he didn't mention the eye test.
-
Wilt Davis
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
No mention of time travel either. Not all that impressed.
-
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
As always jlip, great stuff.
-
One of the Goodfellas
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
-
Curry fam
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
People dont change it seems.
-
God-killer
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
Originally Posted by navy
People dont change it seems.
More like rhetoric doesn't change.
-
Local High School Star
Re: 1989 article on MJ reads like an ISH post
Originally Posted by Psileas
Wow, seems they had recruited young Lazeruss.
Originally Posted by jlip
I thought the same thing.
Nah, he'd be arguing against that guy, and winning(nobody beats Laz in a debate). His view of that era changed a few years back.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|