Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 40
  1. #16
    2Willd & 2Fresh est.86 Real14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    16,894

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Tha spurs in 99 iz an asterisk so that decade don't count and they were never a dynasty cuz they never won a back 2 back

  2. #17
    Knicks all da way imdaman99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    26,448

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Core? You mean Duncan?

  3. #18
    MH! aj1987's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    22,584

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Quote Originally Posted by RagaZ
    How massive is this achievement?
    Amazing. No "core" has ever done it and no "core" is even close to doing it.

  4. #19
    Cavs for life BigTicket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    5,321

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Quote Originally Posted by T_L_P
    Which players have won titles in three different decades?
    Dunno, but it's a really arbitrary distinction.

    Kareem's first and last title were 17 years apart, while this would be 15 years for Duncan.

  5. #20
    The Beast In Me T_L_P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,665

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Quote Originally Posted by Real14
    Tha spurs in 99 iz an asterisk so that decade don't count and they were never a dynasty cuz they never won a back 2 back
    Damn. you mean we don't tha arbitrary title?

  6. #21
    The Beast In Me T_L_P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,665

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Quote Originally Posted by BigTicket
    Dunno, but it's a really arbitrary distinction.

    Kareem's first and last title were 17 years apart, while this would be 15 years for Duncan.
    Of course it is. It adds nothing to Duncan's or Pop's resume. Just interested to know if there was anyone, that's all.

  7. #22
    #SAS Yankstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,039

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Now that the clippers are out I hope the spurs tear the Heat a new a hole
    #revenge
    #nothreepeat
    #Duncan for FMVP

  8. #23
    2Willd & 2Fresh est.86 Real14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    16,894

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Quote Originally Posted by T_L_P
    Damn. you mean we don't tha arbitrary title?
    Nope. Plus y'all didn't have tha same core and change it to 2 different decades bro.

  9. #24
    Learning to shoot layups PassTheRock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    89

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Quote Originally Posted by Real14
    Tha spurs in 99 iz an asterisk so that decade don't count and they were never a dynasty cuz they never won a back 2 back
    would it still be an asterisk if the knicks won it instead?

  10. #25
    2Willd & 2Fresh est.86 Real14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    16,894

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Quote Originally Posted by PassTheRock
    would it still be an asterisk if the knicks won it instead?
    No because that mean they underdog their way to a title without Ewing. Spurs have an asterisk in 99 cuz knicks best player named Ewing was injured.

  11. #26
    Bran Fam Member ImKobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Staples Center
    Posts
    26,589

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    1999 is a serious asterisk title itself + not the same core.

  12. #27
    Bran Fam Member ImKobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Staples Center
    Posts
    26,589

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Quote Originally Posted by Real14
    No because that mean they underdog their way to a title without Ewing. Spurs have an asterisk in 99 cuz knicks best player named Ewing was injured.
    Ewing was also 36

    Sprewell was their 2nd best player

    winning against an 8th seed in the Finals, that was just 4 games above .500, and in a season where they only played 50 RS games? not impressed.

  13. #28
    2Willd & 2Fresh est.86 Real14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    16,894

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Quote Originally Posted by ImKobe
    Ewing was also 36

    Sprewell was their 2nd best player

    winning against an 8th seed in the Finals, that was just 4 games above .500, and in a season where they only played 50 RS games? not impressed.
    True damn story.

  14. #29
    Lad
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,620

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Pop - Duncan core.

  15. #30
    NBA Legend Hey Yo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    17,667

    Default Re: Winning the title in 3 different decades with the same core

    Quote Originally Posted by RagaZ
    How massive is this achievement?
    Parker and Manu wasn't playing in the NBA when Spurs won in 1999

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •