Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29

Thread: 37/18/13/3

  1. #16
    ISH vigilant Mr Feeny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Jackson Hall, Wyoming
    Posts
    8,690

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by J Shuttlesworth
    I saw a stat saying that Barkley was the last guy to get 35-15-10 in a game
    Yeah I just looked at the espn front page. Apparently it's the first time anyone puts up these totals in the playoffs, in the history of this league.

  2. #17
    Good college starter
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,455

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by J Shuttlesworth
    I saw a stat saying that Barkley was the last guy to get 35-15-10 in a game
    Except Barkley put up 43, 15, and 10 on 73% shooting!!!

    Not this 37.8% nonsense LeBron Stans are trying to prop up as an "all time great performance".

    Also, Chuck did it against the Payton/Kemp Seattle Supersonics. You know, legitimate competition. (I know it's hard for LeBron Stans to recognize what a legit playoff team looks like since LeBron has played/beaten so few in his career).

  3. #18
    Earned not given
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    2,964

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by IllegalD
    Except Barkley put up 43, 15, and 10 on 73% shooting!!!

    Not this 37.8% nonsense LeBron Stans are trying to prop up as an "all time great performance".

    Also, Chuck did it against the Payton/Kemp Seattle Supersonics. You know, legitimate competition. (I know it's hard for LeBron Stans to recognize what a legit playoff team looks like since LeBron has played/beaten so few in his career).
    Let me know when Charles Barkley shoots three's and long contested 2's and still maintains a FG% above 50%...

  4. #19
    ISH vigilant Mr Feeny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Jackson Hall, Wyoming
    Posts
    8,690

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by IllegalD
    Except Barkley put up 43, 15, and 10 on 73% shooting!!!

    Not this 37.8% nonsense LeBron Stans are trying to prop up as an "all time great performance".

    .
    Now that you recognize the importance of efficiency, you can see why Kobe is not a top 10 player

  5. #20
    Good college starter
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,455

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by chosen_one6
    Let me know when Charles Barkley shoots three's and long contested 2's and still maintains a FG% above 50%...





    I'm DYING right now.

    LeBron Stans now starting to sound like Kobe Stans did int he 2000's.


  6. #21
    Good college starter
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,455

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Feeny
    Now that you recognize the importance of efficiency, you can see why Kobe is not a top 10 player
    So make up your mind, though...

    Does efficiency matter or not?

    Cause if it does, then LeBron's performance isn't a historic all time great performance....

    Kinda seems like.... efficiency only matters whenever it's convenient to your stupid little bias...?

  7. #22
    Earned not given
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    2,964

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by IllegalD





    I'm DYING right now.

    LeBron Stans now starting to sound like Kobe Stans did int he 2000's.

    When 90% of your shots are within 10 feet of the rim, you're going to have a ridiculously good FG%. It's common sense, something you seem to lack.

  8. #23
    Lol RRR3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    47,709

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by IllegalD





    I'm DYING right now.

    LeBron Stans now starting to sound like Kobe Stans did int he 2000's.

    Probably because LeBron has been playing like Kobe.

  9. #24
    ISH vigilant Mr Feeny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Jackson Hall, Wyoming
    Posts
    8,690

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by IllegalD
    So make up your mind, though...

    Does efficiency matter or not?

    Cause if it does, then LeBron's performance isn't a historic all time great performance....

    Kinda seems like.... efficiency only matters whenever it's convenient to your stupid little bias...?
    Do you lack basic comprehension skills? Ofcourse it matters
    And is the reason that Kobe is not a top 10 player

  10. #25
    A humble prophet Dresta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Medina
    Posts
    9,830

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by ImKobe
    JR Smith 17/10/1 with 2 blocks, 6/14 shooting
    James Jones 9/3/5, 2/4 from 3
    TT 10/7/2 with 2 blocks on 5/7 shooting
    Shump 15/7 on 5/11 shooting
    Dellavedova 17/3/2, 4/9 from 3

    Bran - 14/37 shooting, 37 points
    rest of team, 26/60 shooting, 77 points


    Funny how Bron stans don't care about efficiency any more.

  11. #26
    Good college starter
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,455

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Feeny
    Do you lack basic comprehension skills? Ofcourse it matters
    And is the reason that Kobe is not a top 10 player
    Great. So that settles it

    This isn't an all-time great/historic performance, good to know.

    La LeBron Famiglia keep taking those L's, an holding 'em.

  12. #27
    ISH vigilant Mr Feeny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Jackson Hall, Wyoming
    Posts
    8,690

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by IllegalD
    Great. So that settles it. I agree that Kobe is not a top 10 player

  13. #28
    NBA Legend dunksby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    15,488

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by J Shuttlesworth
    What do we call it though? "The ______ Game"

    Any ideas?
    The Disinhibition Game? He for sure showed no regard for shot efficiency.

  14. #29
    Decent playground baller Xoush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    358

    Default Re: 37/18/13/3

    Quote Originally Posted by Dresta


    Funny how Bron stans don't care about efficiency any more.
    They only care about those things if it benefits LeBron. Now they bring up the argument of contested jumpshots being far more difficult, hence the low fg%.
    But when Kobe fans argued that for years they dismissed it, when Lebron had like 60%fg mainly because of dunks and layups they jizzed their pants.

    smh

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •