-
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
Originally Posted by juju151111
I can see the 80s, but nobody in the 00s beating the 90s bulls.
I disagree.
Shaq and Kobe and some of the Spurs teams would have destoryed the Utah Jazz and anyone they played.
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
Originally Posted by 9erEmpire
I believe the best teams are in the 80's and then 00's. There were a lot of good teams and dynasties that came out of the 00's.
Besides the Lakers from 2000-2002 the top '90s teams (not even going to include the Bulls) would have beaten any of the teams that have in the past decade. The Rockets with Hakeem, Sonics with Payton & Kemp, Jazz, Suns with Barkley, Knicks with Ewing even some of the '90s Pacers and Heat teams would destroy the teams that have competed for championships recently.
The '90s >>>>> '00s
-
LA Galaxy
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
Just ban him already, the guy can't control himself.
-
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
Originally Posted by ConanRulesNBC
Besides the Lakers from 2000-2002 the top '90s teams (not even going to include the Bulls) would have beaten any of the teams that have in the past decade. The Rockets with Hakeem, Sonics with Payton & Kemp, Jazz, Suns with Barkley, Knicks with Ewing even some of the '90s Pacers and Heat teams would destroy the teams that have competed for championships recently.
The '90s >>>>> '00s
Those guys you mentioned weren't even considered the best at their position and were some were the lone stars on their team.
Hakeem- lone star on a team.
Drexler - ring chasing
Barkley - lone star and on the back end of his career.
Ewing- lone star on the worst offensive team in the 90's.
Reggie Miller - Indiana's best player and he's a 3pt shooter that plays no defense.
Do you want me to breakdown the 00's teams?
-
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
Originally Posted by 9erEmpire
I disagree.
Shaq and Kobe and some of the Spurs teams would have destoryed the Utah Jazz and anyone they played.
Like I said No '00 team is beating the 90s bulls. Spurs team isnt destroying the jazz team.
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
Holy crap... nice job at trolling. Are you 9 years old?
-
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
Originally Posted by juju151111
Like I said No '00 team is beating the 90s bulls. Spurs team isnt destroying the jazz team.
You have a top 10 player of all time, Duncan and company, and you don't think they would beat those 90's team, with lone stars?
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
Originally Posted by 9erEmpire
Those guys you mentioned weren't even considered the best at their position and were some were the lone stars on their team.
Hakeem- lone star on a team.
Drexler - ring chasing
Barkley - lone star and on the back end of his career.
Ewing- lone star on the worst offensive team in the 90's.
Reggie Miller - Indiana's best player and he's a 3pt shooter that plays no defense.
Do you want me to breakdown the 00's teams?
-
kidachi
Fan in the Stands (unregistered)
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
I know you're just a troll and you're probably just fcuking with us.. 'cause I know you can't be serious with all these threads.. this is for the others that are reading this..
there were 6 teams with 20 or less wins in the 97-98 season because there were 5 teams with 60 wins or more.. it balances out.. that's the math sir.. like there can't be 2 teams with 0-82 or 82-0.. I don't know if I got my point across clearly but that's what I mean..
Last edited by kidachi; 01-05-2012 at 06:19 PM.
-
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
Besides Jordan....
What player that played in the 90's would be considered a top 10 GOAT?...not many.
Don't take credit for Shaq because he built a majority of his legacy in 00's....
-
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
No perimiter players besides MJ managed even 26 ppg despite the "
-
Banned
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
The 90's was the only era where top 3 player's in the league won league/finals mvp's. In the 2000's you had guys like Billups (non allstar), Tony Parker, and Paul Pierce who won finals mvp's and neither were even top 10 players in the league. Also you had guys like Nash in 2005 who wasn't even a top 5 player win league mvp.
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
Originally Posted by 9erEmpire
You have a top 10 player of all time, Duncan and company, and you don't think they would beat those 90's team, with lone stars?
Lone stars? WTF? Hakeem and Drexler together with solid players behind them like Horry and Sam Cassell? Those '94 and '95 Rockets teams would destroy anyone from the '00s. Hakeem had his way with Shaq in the '95 finals.
The Jazz with Stockton and Malone.
Knicks with Ewing and Starks.
Suns with Barkley, Ainge, Ceballos, Kevin Johnson
-
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
Originally Posted by Duncan21formvp
The 90's was the only era where top 3 player's in the league won league/finals mvp's. In the 2000's you had guys like Billups (non allstar), Tony Parker, and Paul Pierce who won finals mvp's and neither were even top 10 players in the league. Also you had guys like Nash in 2005 who wasn't even a top 5 player win league mvp.
Those guys you mentioned played on far superior teams than any in the 90's.
Those players you named, may or may not be the best player on their respective teams, it shows how good these teams are from top to bottom.
-
Dunking on everybody in the park
Re: 1998 was the Worst Year of the NBA
miami would go 82-0 in that season
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|