Salty Shaq talking sh** about Nash's back to back MVPs

[oarabbus]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujmWN_HSNcc

Best part is everyone's reaction after Shaq goes "No way"

Ernie at the end...

Maybe Shaq did deserve the MVPs but he still salty like a saltine

[JohnMax]

Shaq was a shell of himself in Miami. He should've gotten multiple MVPs in Los Angeles.

[ArbitraryWater]

Shaq and MVP in 2006?

2005? Why not.. But his best next case was clearly 2001... Robbed.

[Ca$H]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujmWN_HSNcc

Best part is everyone's reaction after Shaq goes "No way"

Ernie at the end...

Maybe Shaq did deserve the MVPs but he still salty like a saltine

2005- Shaq

2006- Kobe

Nash got it because he is white.

[Marchesk]

Can you imagine if a dominant big in the 60s would have been passed up for a 6 foot white guy?

[Real14]

Shaq and MVP in 2006?

2005? Why not.. But his best next case was clearly 2001... Robbed.

[Real14]

Kobe should of won in 06. 05 definitely didn't belong to Shaq.

[Hey Yo]

2005- Shaq

2006- Kobe

Nash got it because he is white.

2006, Amare missed 79 games. Suns lost their best pick and roll player and his 26pts 9 boards from the year before. Lost 8 more games but still finished 2nd in the West.

The right man won.

[Myth]

I think Shaq deserved it in 2000, 2001, and 2005. He wasn't as dominant in 2005 as he was in the early 2000s, but the competition was also weaker. I think he didn't win because people had a hard time giving an MVP to a player who was not at their peak while Nash was the better story.

[TheReal Kendall]

2006, Amare missed 79 games. Suns lost their best pick and roll player and his 26pts 9 boards from the year before. Lost 8 more games but still finished 2nd in the West.

The right man won.

[ArbitraryWater]

I think Shaq deserved it in 2000, 2001, and 2005. He wasn't as dominant in 2005 as he was in the early 2000s, but the competition was also weaker. I think he didn't win because people had a hard time giving an MVP to a player who was not at their peak while Nash was the better story.

And due to Wade.. Who was like the up and coming star, and became the team's leader in the '05 playoffs.

[Real14]

I think Shaq deserved it in 2000, 2001, and 2005. He wasn't as dominant in 2005 as he was in the early 2000s, but the competition was also weaker. I think he didn't win because people had a hard time giving an MVP to a player who was not at their peak while Nash was the better story.

I only agree with 2000.

[T_L_P]

If Shaq played all season, he should have been MVP in 98.

He should have won it in 01.

Dirk and Duncan were my picks for 05.

Nash in 06.

Dirk in 07.

[Real14]

If Shaq played all season, he should have been MVP in 98.

He should have won it in 01.

Dirk and Duncan were my picks for 05.

Nash in 06.

Dirk in 07.

[ArbitraryWater]

If Shaq played all season, he should have been MVP in 98.

He should have won it in 01.

Dirk and Duncan were my picks for 05.

Nash in 06.

Dirk in 07.

Pretty much..

Shaq had a good case in '98 and '99 also.. Dude was an option so many times but only won it once in perhaps the GOAT season..