Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19
  1. #1
    Banned Duncan21formvp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    4,499

    Default Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    How is that possible?

    Neither team won the title though.

  2. #2
    Embiid > Jokic SouBeachTalents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    27,266

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    The Spurs still won 61 and made the WCF after Duncan retired

  3. #3
    Local High School Star hiphopanonymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    1,598

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    Quote Originally Posted by Duncan21formvp
    How is that possible?

    Neither team won the title though.
    Might have had something to do with Kareem being 42 and replaced by a 22 year old Divac there sport

  4. #4
    Gif-ted bigkingsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Land of 1 NBA Championship*
    Posts
    18,524

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
    The Spurs still won 61 and made the WCF after Duncan retired
    And that's a wrap

  5. #5
    Banned Gus Hemmingway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    7,840

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
    The Spurs still won 61 and made the WCF after Duncan retired

  6. #6
    Coach SamuraiSWISH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    13,486

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    Kareem isn’t better than:

    1: Jordan
    2: Bird
    3: Magic / LeBron
    4: Duncan / Hakeem / Shaq

  7. #7
    Jordan Stopper
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    10,834

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    [QUOTE=SamuraiSWISH]Kareem isn

  8. #8
    Local High School Star theballerFKA Ace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Low Cal
    Posts
    1,795

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    Quote Originally Posted by Duncan21formvp
    How is that possible?
    He was 42. When he was the same age as Duncan in his last season hobbling around embarrassing himself, Kareem was still a 17/7/3 57% player

  9. #9
    I make 50-feet jumpers Odinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,041

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    [QUOTE=SamuraiSWISH]Kareem isn

  10. #10
    Banned Duncan21formvp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    4,499

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
    The Spurs still won 61 and made the WCF after Duncan retired
    Didn't win a title without Duncan before nor after even when having MVP candidates.

  11. #11
    Embiid > Jokic SouBeachTalents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    27,266

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    Quote Originally Posted by Duncan21formvp
    Didn't win a title without Duncan before nor after even when having MVP candidates.
    Neither did the Lakers without Kareem

  12. #12
    Serious playground baller
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    445

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    Kareem is definetly the most overrated message board player.

    on real gm they pretty much put him automatic top 3 with MJ and LeBron. LMAO

    I think Anthony Davis is a good modern comparison. Not in their games because Anthony Davis is way more skilled, but high profile bigman that put up big numbers but lose and can't be that elite first option guy. Garnett is in that same mold. Kareem was in his prime in the weakest era in league history(70s) and missing the playoffs/going below .500. Literally missing the playoffs

  13. #13
    Banned Duncan21formvp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    4,499

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
    Neither did the Lakers without Kareem
    They won 5 titles before Kareem and won with Wilt as well. Also had a guy who won more finals mvp's than Kareem on the same team and more league mvp's when they played together. And then won 5 more once Kareem left.

  14. #14
    Local High School Star hiphopanonymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    1,598

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    Quote Originally Posted by HeatFanSince88
    Kareem is definetly the most overrated message board player.

    on real gm they pretty much put him automatic top 3 with MJ and LeBron. LMAO

    I think Anthony Davis is a good modern comparison. Not in their games because Anthony Davis is way more skilled, but high profile bigman that put up big numbers but lose and can't be that elite first option guy. Garnett is in that same mold. Kareem was in his prime in the weakest era in league history(70s) and missing the playoffs/going below .500. Literally missing the playoffs
    Man Bucks era and mid 70's Jabbar would tear up Davis F outta here. He's a GOAT candidate. And for damn good reason. Heat fan since 88 - if that's when you saw Jabbar you saw a man in his 40's. Davis won't even be in the league at that age.

    I also like how matching up against Unseld, Hayes, Lanier, Gilmore, Reed, Cowens, Chamberlain, Thurmond, Bellamy, Walton not to mention guys like Lacey, Smith, McAdoo, Boerwinkle and many more that rarely get mentions is "weakest" era to you as well. Tiny, Doc, Thompson, West, Hawkins, Pistol, Frazier, Havlicek, Gervin, - a weak era? That's some fluff the journalists like to say to make the Bird and Magic documentaries seem more of a legit story like as if the NBA started with them. It didn't and both the NBA and ABA had great players and teams in the 1970's. Shit, like 17 or so teams and how many centers and a few forwards and backcourt guys did I just mention just off the top of my head? I'd argue the early 70's is the strongest it ever was in terms of density per team of HOF center position players (at least on par with late 60's - and more dense than 90's). It had a few image issues later 70's due to drugs but that carried on into the 80's as well into the Bird and Magic era - do we discount their era too? They put him up there in other discussions because he belongs up there.
    Last edited by hiphopanonymous; 01-21-2019 at 03:02 AM.

  15. #15
    Embiid > Jokic SouBeachTalents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    27,266

    Default Re: Lakers lose Kareem and go from 57 wins to 63 wins

    Quote Originally Posted by Duncan21formvp
    They won 5 titles before Kareem and won with Wilt as well. Also had a guy who won more finals mvp's than Kareem on the same team and more league mvp's when they played together. And then won 5 more once Kareem left.
    Because titles won literally decades before or after a players stint with a team with a completely separate roster of players has any relevance to anything Talking about the 2000's Lakers or George fcking Mikan like they have anything to do with Kareem's stint on the Lakers

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •