-
Not airballing my layups anymore
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Win Loss record without Kobe?
Originally Posted by tamaraw08
Not sure if this is accurate but wikiAnswers says
Answer:
Without Kobe, the Lakers are 43-21 (including 0-1 in playoffs), as of Feb 1, 2012.
That includes a game where he played only 1 minute, as well as a game he played 6 minutes (going 1 for 2, scoring 2 pts total.
Can anybody validate? thanks
This all is BS what counts is the 5 chips with kobe
End of thread... Now everbody go to sleep
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: Win Loss record without Kobe?
-
Re: [Official Kobe Bryant Thread] Kobe's Return
But then why have a coach? because now they play no where near what MDA wants. the only thing he does is giving stupid interviews.
-
Re: [Official Kobe Bryant Thread] Kobe's Return
-
Stay Strong Droth
Re: [Official Kobe Bryant Thread] Kobe's Return
Originally Posted by L.A. Jazz
But then why have a coach? because now they play no where near what MDA wants. the only thing he does is giving stupid interviews.
"But uuuuhhhmm, (insert bullshit here).... but uuuuhhhmmm"
Thats all I hear.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: [Official Kobe Bryant Thread] Kobe's Return
-
College superstar
Re: Win Loss record without Kobe?
-
I hit open 5-foot jumpshots with ease
Re: Win Loss record without Kobe?
Originally Posted by tamaraw08
OMG, sorry for hitting a nerve "Kobe- FAN"
I was just asking to validate the answer.
Chicago won atleast 55 games when MJ left the first time. Does that mean he is not a great player?
Well ofcourse Lakers wouldn't have won 5 rings without Kobe. I felt the year 2001, Kobe should have won the MVP esp when he almost single-handedly dominated the Spurs in San Antonio. The problem was when they to the finals, Shaq would dominate the weaker centers of the East, hence, he wins the finals MVPs.
I think it's an interesting thing to ask or discuss, the Bulls that year led by Scottie Pippen (who I believe led them in most major statistical categories that year) just showed that the team was deeper than simply one great player (and that Pippen's importance as part of the team in history has been majorly undervalued to the point it makes me almost sad) and it just shows that not one player wins championships, I consider it to rate a player based on titles, it's the most important thing in sports but you win them as a team in the NBA never as just one player, the most common example I've noticed with no help is my favourite player Akeem/Hakeem but he had for one title Clyde the Glyde. Teams may play better at times without a ball dominant player but it certainly limits how far you go in the end, kind of a bit like how when Kobe was injured this year not playing, players moved the ball more looked good to start, the role players like Meeks stepped up, but then when the role players who stepped up went cold then you kind of want the ball dominant star player back because in the end it limits you for anything more than a short period of time
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: Win Loss record without Kobe?
Originally Posted by Lakers91
I think it's an interesting thing to ask or discuss, the Bulls that year led by Scottie Pippen (who I believe led them in most major statistical categories that year) just showed that the team was deeper than simply one great player (and that Pippen's importance as part of the team in history has been majorly undervalued to the point it makes me almost sad) and it just shows that not one player wins championships, I consider it to rate a player based on titles, it's the most important thing in sports but you win them as a team in the NBA never as just one player, the most common example I've noticed with no help is my favourite player Akeem/Hakeem but he had for one title Clyde the Glyde. Teams may play better at times without a ball dominant player but it certainly limits how far you go in the end, kind of a bit like how when Kobe was injured this year not playing, players moved the ball more looked good to start, the role players like Meeks stepped up, but then when the role players who stepped up went cold then you kind of want the ball dominant star player back because in the end it limits you for anything more than a short period of time
......and Great that you are posting more!!!
-
NBA lottery pick
Laker News: Kobe Bryant has fracture in his left knee. Out 6 weeks
@Lakers: Kobe Bryant has a fracture of the lateral tibial plateau in his left knee. He is expected to miss 6 weeks
the contract extensions sounds right now :)
Link: http://www.lakersnation.com/breaking...ry/2013/12/19/
Last edited by $LakerGold; 12-24-2013 at 09:39 PM.
-
Re: Laker News: Kobe Bryant has fracture in his left knee. Out 6 weeks
Yeah, saw him went down last night. Took him about 5 minutes to shake it off. Damn, didn't know it was that bad. Get well soon, Kobe!
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Laker News: Kobe Bryant has fracture in his left knee. Out 6 weeks
Originally Posted by $LakerGold
Yeah, saw him went down last night. Took him about 5 minutes to shake it off. Damn, didn't know it was that bad. Get well soon, Kobe!
tank time
-
Re: Laker News: Kobe Bryant has fracture in his left knee. Out 6 weeks
Originally Posted by Lakers_Kobe_Fan
tank time
Around the late 10's? But, I really think that we'll make it to at least 8th or 10th seed.
1st 14 of the 15 draft picks belongs to the East. haha
-
Not airballing my layups anymore
Re: Laker News: Kobe Bryant has fracture in his left knee. Out 6 weeks
Just think Kobe played the last 6 minutes in the 4th with a fracture but the good news is that he won't be needing a surgery. At least Kobe will be back sooner unlike D Rose who'll be out for the season again hurry back Kobe the Lakers need u.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|