-
Local High School Star
Re: #52 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by TheMarkMadsen
Is your username just to fool people into thinking you've watched basketball for a long time.
if you actually watched your username play & still say Howard over Worthy then
You'd think the 1988 FMVP would get more respect from 1987 lakers
What do you mean by this? Worthy's argument over Howard is that of longevity. Prime for prime, Howard is clearly the better player.
-
ISH's Negro Historian
Re: #52 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by DatAsh
What do you mean by this? Worthy's argument over Howard is that of longevity. Prime for prime, Howard is clearly the better player.
Worthy played in possibly the deepest era for small forwards ever, while Dwight plays in this era of centers.
I'd take Thurmond over Dwight. But I'm voting for neither of the three I just mentioned.
At this point of his career, I might even take Zo Mourning over Dwight?
-
Re: #52 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
How is Ray ahead of Tmac?
-
ISH's Negro Historian
Re: #52 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by WockaVodka
How is Ray ahead of Tmac?
How is Pierce ahead of Tmac?
-
Re: #52 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by L.Kizzle
How is Pierce ahead of Tmac?
What does this have to do with anything?
Pierce was as good of an all-around player as Tmac was, maybe even better although he didn't peak as high as Tmac did but Pierce did peak longer than McGrady did.
It still has nothing to do with the question. Tmac should be ahead of Ray.
-
Scott Hastings Fan
Re: #52 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by L.Kizzle
Billy Cunningham is the best talent available.
Why would you take Cunningham over Thurmond?
I consider them the same level of player, but in that case I'd rather take the big man.
What do you think?
Originally Posted by fsvr54
I want to vote for Thurmond, but he won't make it, so Worthy is my vote.
My vote is Thurmond too. Change his vote to what he "wants" to vote for and Thurmond is in the lead.
Last edited by G.O.A.T; 10-01-2012 at 01:10 AM.
-
Local High School Star
Re: #52 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Wow we are still going??? James Worthy please
-
sahelanthropus
Re: #52 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by G.O.A.T
Why would you take Cunningham over Thurmond?
I consider them the same level of player, but in that case I'd rather take the big man.
What do you think?
My vote is Thurmond too. Change his vote to what he "wants" to vote for and Thurmond is in the lead.
put me down for Nate as well, and I think we can call this
-
Raps
Re: #52 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
James Worthy. after that Reggie
-
Local High School Star
Re: #52 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by fpliii
put me down for Nate as well, and I think we can call this
Since this is actually happening, put me down for Thurmond as well.
I was originally going to vote for Thurmond, but I saw several "I would vote for Thurmond,..., but I'll vote for so and so" and decided it was best to stay out this round.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|