-
Re: Paul Pierce says a ring should be prerequisite for HOF induction.
Paul Pierce you are a nobody
-
National High School Star
Re: Paul Pierce says a ring should be prerequisite for HOF induction.
I do feel like rings have been discounted over time you have people Robert Horry and Bill Laimbeer who are renowned with 12 rings and they aren't in the hall. But the inverse isn't hey push out the guys who didn't have that window to win a title. A lot of times titles are based on timing.
-
Bran Fam Member
Re: Paul Pierce says a ring should be prerequisite for HOF induction.
That wouldn't work. Do we count the role player rings some of these HOFers won after not doing shit for 90% of their career, like Mitch Richmond?
Sure, he's an NBA champion and would be in the HOF based on this idea, but he just sat on the Lakers' bench and gave them next to nothing in the Playoffs at the end of his career.
As a star, Richmond won just 2 Playoff series and made the Playoffs 3x in total before he joined the Lakers. He shouldn't be in the HOF regardless but I don't think Pierce's idea works at all.
-
Banned
Re: Paul Pierce says a ring should be prerequisite for HOF induction.
Originally Posted by GimmeThat
you, are what we call cancer.
Excellent use of the comma for effect.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Paul Pierce says a ring should be prerequisite for HOF induction.
Pierce was a great player but some of his takes are embarrassing. Sometimes I wonder if he just says crazy stuff to draw attention to himself like some of the talking heads.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|