-
Re: Outrageous take or no?
Yeah it's pretty outrageous because if the guy that posted that actually watched the games he would know how far beyond boxscores Curry's game went.
There is no way through traditional basic stats to track how good Curry was at his peak.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Outrageous take or no?
Originally Posted by Wardell Curry
Yeah it's pretty outrageous because if the guy that posted that actually watched the games he would know how far beyond boxscores Curry's game went.
There is no way through traditional basic stats to track how good Curry was at his peak.
Yeah
Big time low iq thread
-
The Bearded Menace
Re: Outrageous take or no?
2016 curry blew a 3-1 lead in the finals with a 73-win team, when he couldn't get past over the mighty defense of delly bt.
-
NBA Superstar
Re: Outrageous take or no?
Nah we aren't going to start forgetting how good prime Curry was. Very outrageous take.
-
National High School Star
Re: Outrageous take or no?
I think we all kinda know that Luka is black listed from the MVP's partly due to his age also his geography. It's going to be weird next season with Jokic definately not getting a 4th MVP
-
NBA Superstar
Re: Outrageous take or no?
Originally Posted by SATAN
Nah we aren't going to start forgetting how good prime Curry was. Very outrageous take.
In the regular season, sure. He could have probably had a bunch more single game records if he and the other starters werent sitting out the whole 4th so often. And yes Curry was a big part of that and deserves credit for it.
But there's also a reason the reputation exists that in big games, it was often Curry's teammates grinding back from a deficit or building a lead while Steph disappeared, and then once the Warriors were back in the driver's seat Curry would hit a shot or two and start prancing around. Sometimes getting so excited by frontrunning he'd throw a stupidly casual behind the back pass out of bounds in a big moment.
So let's not forget BOTH sides of the Curry coin.
If someone wants to take the game's current leading scorer and a pure playoff killer like Doncic over a sus, prancing, skipping, disappearing, pouting, returning, shimmying, 1/5 FMVP Curry, I dont think that's "very outrageous."
Last edited by FultzNationRISE; 04-03-2024 at 08:28 PM.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Outrageous take or no?
Originally Posted by FultzNationRISE
In the regular season, sure. He could have probably had a bunch more single game records if he and the other starters werent sitting out the whole 4th so often. And yes Curry was a big part of that and deserves credit for it.
But there's also a reason the reputation exists that in big games, it was often Curry's teammates grinding back from a deficit or building a lead while Steph disappeared, and then once the Warriors were back in the driver's seat Curry would hit a shot or two and start prancing around. Sometimes getting so excited by frontrunning he'd throw a stupidly casual behind the back pass out of bounds in a big moment.
So let's not forget BOTH sides of the Curry coin.
If someone wants to take the game's current leading scorer and a pure playoff killer like Doncic over a sus, prancing, skipping, disappearing, pouting, returning, shimmying, 1/5 FMVP Curry, I dont think that's "outrageous."
this is low iq false narrative nonsense that can’t be backed up by any sort of facts
nice try though
-
NBA Superstar
Re: Outrageous take or no?
Originally Posted by warriorfan
this is low iq false narrative nonsense that can’t be backed up by any sort of facts
nice try though
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Outrageous take or no?
Originally Posted by FultzNationRISE
show any sort of stats that back up anything you are saying
but you can’t since this was just some weird rant that came out of your head
-
Re: Outrageous take or no?
It is a ridiculous take. No different than when Harder was "the best scorer ever" during his big ppg season. Charles said that on live TV.
Ultimately that proved to be absolutely untrue and just in the moment type shit.
Currys brand of basketball is far superior to Luka. That will be proven once again in the playoffs - where it matters.
Steph allows organic team play. Actually, he doesn't allow it he inspires it. Enhances it.
Luka ball, Harden ball, that shit ball gets exposed when it's winning time. And very hard to build a super team around because one ball.
-
NBA Superstar
Re: Outrageous take or no?
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Outrageous take or no?
Originally Posted by Carbine
It is a ridiculous take. No different than when Harder was "the best scorer ever" during his big ppg season. Charles said that on live TV.
Ultimately that proved to be absolutely untrue and just in the moment type shit.
Currys brand of basketball is far superior to Luka. That will be proven once again in the playoffs - where it matters.
Steph allows organic team play. Actually, he doesn't allow it he inspires it. Enhances it.
Luka ball, Harden ball, that shit ball gets exposed when it's winning time. And very hard to build a super team around because one ball.
Fultz has always made countless posts about how “hero ball” is such a detrimental style of play
Guess his eye test lacks some consistency
-
NBA Superstar
Re: Outrageous take or no?
Originally Posted by Carbine
Currys brand of basketball is far superior to Luka. That will be proven once again in the playoffs - where it matters.
Steve Nash's "brand of basketball" is far superior to MJ's.
Is he the better player?
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Outrageous take or no?
Originally Posted by FultzNationRISE
there’s 48 mins of game
last 45 seconds is literally a fraction of the game
if you want to boil all play down to a minute fraction and extrapolate that….
wow
hope you aren’t a big fan of something called “sample size”
you got caught with your pants down right now, you can either concede, keep being intellectually dishonest, or try to play this whole thing off like you were “just joking”
keep it consistent though
-
NBA Superstar
Re: Outrageous take or no?
Originally Posted by warriorfan
Fultz has always made countless posts about how “hero ball” is such a detrimental style of play
Guess his eye test lacks some consistency
I'm not saying anyone SHOULD take Luka.
I'm saying dont be revisionist about "prime Curry." He was not without flaws.
He was an important, AND flawed piece of a stacked team.
Luka is also an important, AND flawed piece of a far less talented team.
Those are the facts.
There is no need to get into our feels about it.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|