Tom Chambers 60 vs Antawn Jamisons 51.

[tpols]

EDIT: Antawn was 7th in points scored from 2000-2001 to 2009-2010

That's crazy he scored more than garnett and ray Allen since their primes overlapped. Almost as much as Duncan too. Didn't expect that.

[ShawkFactory]

Jamison only dribbled more than once if at all on a couple of these plays.

He was a fantastic play finisher. As a current comparison I would clock him as a more skilled but less athletic John Collins. The overall DNA is similar between them I think. NEVER ask either to put the ball on the floor and create for anyone but hand it off and they can finish on all 3 levels.

I also didn't know Chambers scored 60. That was cool to watch.

[Jasper]

Jamison was more of a 3 in a PF body. When he got older and less quick , he became more of his position as a 4.

Chambers was not agile , but he was smart. (both players were)
But my point about Chambers was that he was more of a thinking player and you could see it when he played. (Not by instinct)

[GimmeThat]

what happens with a Redd/Johnson, Hill, Jamisons trio

[ShawkFactory]

what happens with a Redd/Johnson, Hill, Jamisons trio

To answer seriously for some reason, probably 46-48 wins and a first round loss. Maybe they get fortunate in a matchup and win round 1 but then get whomped in the ECSF.

[Kblaze8855]

If the Hill is Grant Hill? Redd or Joe Johnson plus Jamison supporting is more than 46-48 wins.

[ShawkFactory]

Well going off of the pattern I didn't suspect Grant Hill since he was earlier and the other 3 played and pretty much peaked at the exact same time. I just thought he was talking about Solomon or some shit.

[L.Kizzle]

I'm fairly sure I remember Manning being listed as F-C at one point.

I think when he got fat and was in Detroit lol.