-
NBA Legend
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers
I'm not RRR3.
Best insult ever then, you’re the same as that moron
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
-
NBA Superstar
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
Originally Posted by bison
How’d the lakers rip him off? 56mil was the highest offer the lakers were legally allowed to make, and Austin was well within his right to reject that offer so who is the stupid one here? (Hint: it’s you). Go take a beginners course in free agency rules before making yourself look dumb here.
Another classic low IQ thread from OP.
Keep up the good work.
-
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
Originally Posted by bladefd
Who was going to offer more money? Only Spurs had the money and they didn't offer. Spurs knew Lakers would match.
Waiting wasn't going to help.
They might have offered it if Reaves was patient enough to wait until July 6th. Instant gratification cost Reaves 44 million dollars. Ouch.
-
National High School Star
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
50 million dollars and a shot at Taylor Swift's billions seems like a smart move to me
-
RENT FREE
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
Reeves got ripped off hard...what's new...LeFraud and Rich Paul probably threatened him
-
The Renaissance man
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
Originally Posted by BallsOut
They might have offered it if Reaves was patient enough to wait until July 6th. Instant gratification cost Reaves 44 million dollars. Ouch.
Lakers would match so why would spurs do it? Just to spite the Lakers?
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
This is kinda scary. Reaves obviously doesn't care about money, he's all in it to win. He would rather be a champion than super rich. But when you think about it is your lifestyle going to be that different if you make 50 million or 100 million? At that point you're still living in a mansion, will have a beautiful woman, and drive the fanciest car around. There's not much to gain when you already make that much.
-
Sixers|Eagles|Phillies
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
56/4 = 14. The guy is 25yrs old only having 2 years of nba experience. And only one notable season where he was solid. And somehow you dudes think he deserves more? Mind boggling
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
Originally Posted by GOBB
56/4 = 14. The guy is 25yrs old only having 2 years of nba experience. And only one notable season where he was solid. And somehow you dudes think he deserves more? Mind boggling
Dillon Brooks has more experience and was garbage in the playoffs, while Reaves for a supporting player went off. Mind boggling is how brooks got way more money than Reaves.
Ask Laker fans if they'd rather have brooks brick laying ass over Reaves sniper shooting and slashing and playmaking and still solid defense and they'd tell you to kick rocks.
-
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
Reaves at 25 will have another 50-100M dollar contract for him at 29.
He hoops. He comes from a good family so I don't believe generational wealth is nearly as important to him cause trust me $56M guaranteed with another $2M in endorsements is enough to be set if he's living like he makes $2M a year.
-
NBA All-star
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers
Brooks got 80 mil
Old Draymond got 100 mil
Reaves is better than both who will only get better.
stfu.
Absolutely correct.... it's very strange.
-
NBA All-star
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
And that moron Lamelo Ball gets 50 mil a year or some shit like that.
Why do teams overpay so much??
you are not gonna win a chip anyway.
-
Sixers|Eagles|Phillies
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
Originally Posted by tpols
Dillon Brooks has more experience and was garbage in the playoffs, while Reaves for a supporting player went off. Mind boggling is how brooks got way more money than Reaves.
Ask Laker fans if they'd rather have brooks brick laying ass over Reaves sniper shooting and slashing and playmaking and still solid defense and they'd tell you to kick rocks.
What exactly does that matter? This dude had 1 damn season at age 25 and got $14mil. And folks say he deserves more. That’s mind boggling. And even more funny that folks are listing other players who were overpaid. So Reaves should get what Dillon Brooks did? I’m lost at what one player getting a contract they didn’t deserve has anything to do with a player with 1 year worth noting they got $14mil per off the rip.
I’ve seen fan bases over value a player one season and the next crickets. So asking laker fans that question is pointless. Where are the Duncan Robinson fans at again?
-
Sixers|Eagles|Phillies
Re: Dillon Brooks got 4years 80million while Austin Reaves only managed 4 years 56mil
Originally Posted by tomtucker
Absolutely correct.... it's very strange.
How is Reaves better than both? Forget the contracts. Let’s talk basketball. But first can toy and others set aside your dislike for brooks and green before even talking basketball and who the better players are? If not then no point discussing. Because that’s why folks make statements like Austin Reaves is better than both stems from. He had one solid year. ONE. ONE
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|