-
Lol
Re: Do you see how hard it is to win with only 18 points from sidekick?
Originally Posted by 3ba11
Pippen inherited a fully-grown 3-peat dynasty in 94' but he simply wasn't a franchise player, so any team with him as the best scorer will fall out of contention QUICKLY due to lack of talent, even a 3-peat dynasty like we saw in 95'
They lost Grant after 94 you braindead buffoon. So now Pippen is supposed to win 55 games without his second option?
-
Austin Reaves Fam
Re: Do you see how hard it is to win with only 18 points from sidekick?
Originally Posted by 3ba11
Pippen inherited a fully-grown 3-peat dynasty in 94' but he simply wasn't a franchise player, so any team with him as the best scorer will fall out of contention QUICKLY due to lack of talent, even a 3-peat dynasty like we saw in 95'
you're dropping jordan down the GOAT rankings with every post
there is a reason why no one respects baldan any more - they read your posts
-
Re: Do you see how hard it is to win with only 18 points from sidekick?
Originally Posted by RRR3
Tony Parker and Ginobili weren't in their primes in 03, 3ball is retarded. You can't just name names and act like it's their prime version or else I can easily counter by saying MJ got destroyed by the Pistons despite having Pippen and Grant.
Jordan won with guys out of their prime because fossil Rodman averaged 3/8 for the entire 97' Playoffs (Jordan tied him in RPG) and wasn't the starter in the 98' Playoffs
Meanwhile, Pippen averaged 16.8 with the worst efficiency anyone ever had in the 96' and 98' Playoffs.
Regardless, the 03" Spurs had deluxe players at every spot compared to the Bulls role players - Parker, Robinson, Manu, Jackson and Bowen are simply better than Horace, Cartwright and Paxson
Last edited by 3ba11; 06-05-2023 at 12:48 AM.
-
Re: Do you see how hard it is to win with only 18 points from sidekick?
Originally Posted by RRR3
They lost Grant after 94 you braindead buffoon. So now Pippen is supposed to win 55 games without his second option?
Horace was never a scoring option, so the Bulls never had a talented cast and only won 55 because they were a fully-grown 3-peat dynasty
But Pippen wasn't a franchise player, so any team with Pippen as the best scorer will fall out of contention QUICKLY due to lack of talent, as we saw in 95 '
-
Verticle?
Re: Do you see how hard it is to win with only 18 points from sidekick?
Originally Posted by 3ba11
Horace was never a scoring option, so the Bulls never had a talented cast and only won 55 because they were a fully-grown 3-peat dynasty
But Pippen wasn't a franchise player, so any team with Pippen as the best scorer will fall out of contention QUICKLY due to lack of talent, as we saw in 95 '
You don't need to score as much to beat the other team when you have all the best defenders your whole career.
-
Re: Do you see how hard it is to win with only 18 points from sidekick?
Originally Posted by plowking
You don't need to score as much to beat the other team when you have all the best defenders your whole career.
The Bulls had the worst rim protection in a "rim protection format" and league, which is why they had weaker team defenses than their ECF and Finals opponents during the 1st three-peat
So no
-
Verticle?
Re: Do you see how hard it is to win with only 18 points from sidekick?
Originally Posted by 3ba11
it didn't change the point being made (that only the GOAT can routinely win with less help.like what Jokic had tonight
And why did your post attempt to refute the OP but infact support the OP by providing examples of everyone else's one-off capability compared to the GOATS standard capability???
Do you even like basketball or are you just ghey for MJ?
Legitimate question.
-
Bran Fam Member
Re: Do you see how hard it is to win with only 18 points from sidekick?
Originally Posted by RRR3
They lost Grant after 94 you braindead buffoon. So now Pippen is supposed to win 55 games without his second option?
If he was a top 5 player like you guys claimed he wouldn't have been fighting to stay at .500 without Jordan in '95
Apparently he was as good as D-Rob, who led scrubs to 50-60 win seasons in the mid-90s lol
-
Lol
Re: Do you see how hard it is to win with only 18 points from sidekick?
Originally Posted by ImKobe
If he was a top 5 player like you guys claimed he wouldn't have been fighting to stay at .500 without Jordan in '95
Apparently he was as good as D-Rob, who led scrubs to 50-60 win seasons in the mid-90s lol
Agreeing with snivelball. SNIVELLBALL. That's how bad LeBron ruined you.
-
Bran Fam Member
Re: Do you see how hard it is to win with only 18 points from sidekick?
Originally Posted by RRR3
Agreeing with snivelball. SNIVELLBALL. That's how bad LeBron ruined you.
3ball is arguably the best poster on this site.
-
Lol
Re: Do you see how hard it is to win with only 18 points from sidekick?
Originally Posted by ImKobe
3ball is arguably the best poster on this site.
This is the single worst post of all time.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|