Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20
  1. #1
    The Most Hated Man Mask the Embiid's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    In Professional Sports
    Posts
    4,095

    Default In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2022

    In 2022 there is one guy on the court for each team that can’t shoot 3’s…. The 2017 warriors would of mopped the floor with the 1st 3 peat team just like they would of mopped the floor with the 01 lakers and 96 bulls, 87 lakers, 86 boston, and anyone else. Just like the 2042 champions will mop the floor with the 2017 warriors….

  2. #2
    It is what it is TheMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    18,126

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    All they do nowadays in this marshmallow ass era is chuck threes and play no defense. Puzzy ass league, even the Euroleague is more physical and its full of gay Frenchies.

    :

  3. #3
    Lol RRR3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    47,422

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    Quote Originally Posted by TheMan View Post
    All they do nowadays in this marshmallow ass era is chuck threes and play no defense. Puzzy ass league, even the Euroleague is more physical and its full of gay Frenchies.

    :


    Then why are you watching? Just to complain? Shut up you old fart.

  4. #4
    Local High School Star nayte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    bottom of the planet
    Posts
    1,739

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    In general I think you are right but one off games are different.all it takes is one of those 5/30 shooting games to change the outcome

  5. #5
    Good college starter RogueBorg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    In Corporation's head
    Posts
    3,001

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    Quote Originally Posted by TheMan View Post
    All they do nowadays in this marshmallow ass era is chuck threes and play no defense. Puzzy ass league, even the Euroleague is more physical and its full of gay Frenchies.

    :
    And yet as important as the three is in today's game, and how much they practice getting the three, 2021-'22 (.354) shooters aren't a whole lot better than they were in 1991-'92 (.331).

    And don't anyone try the small sample size BS argument, the league still shot nearly 17k three-pointers in '91-'92.

  6. #6
    Embiid > Jokic SouBeachTalents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    27,281

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    Quote Originally Posted by RogueBorg View Post
    And yet as important as the three is in today's game, and how much they practice getting the three, 2021-'22 (.354) shooters aren't a whole lot better than they were in 1991-'92 (.331).

    And don't anyone try the small sample size BS argument, the league still shot nearly 17k three-pointers in '91-'92.
    And they took 86k 3 pointers last season. So they shot a higher percentage on a significantly greater volume.

  7. #7
    Lol RRR3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    47,422

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents View Post
    And they took 86k 3 pointers last season. So they shot a higher percentage on a significantly greater volume.
    What point was he even trying to make lmao

  8. #8
    Roid bison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    La Familia/Kobe Army/YDK Gang
    Posts
    6,676

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents View Post
    And they took 86k 3 pointers last season. So they shot a higher percentage on a significantly greater volume.
    But with more attempts come more misses. Significantly more that players are taking by passing up higher percentage 2pt shots ( shots that the increase in converted 3s merely cancels this out, does not necessarily improve on it. So no, the Warriors wouldn't 'mop' the floor with the 97 bulls.) People think we're living in a golden era of 3 point shooting, but you see a lot of chucking on any given night. Yes most guys on the floor at any given time are AT BEST average or merely competent at hitting an open 3. I don't know what game Mask the Embiid is watching where there are 8 Currys on the floor. The 2020 Lakers were a mediocre 3 point shooting team but dominated the league with paint scoring being their bread and butter.

  9. #9
    RENT FREE Spurs m8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    22,905

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    I'm embarrassed for op...though when aren't I?

    I remember when he used to post when he was new to bball...I see he hasn't gotten much better...

    Still a racist simpleton

  10. #10
    NBA Superstar SATAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    13,523

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    Quote Originally Posted by RRR3 View Post


    Then why are you watching? Just to complain? Shut up you old fart.
    Shane Heal doesn't like basketball as much as online petty shit.

  11. #11
    Titles are overrated Kblaze8855's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    I love me some me.
    Posts
    32,954

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    Quote Originally Posted by Mask the Embiid View Post
    In 2022 there is one guy on the court for each team that can’t shoot 3’s…. The 2017 warriors would of mopped the floor with the 1st 3 peat team just like they would of mopped the floor with the 01 lakers and 96 bulls, 87 lakers, 86 boston, and anyone else. Just like the 2042 champions will mop the floor with the 2017 warriors….

    Its nowhere near that simple. What exactly would make a 2042 team outplay the warriors? How much better at shooting do you think humans get than a trip of Curry/Klay/KD? You think the bigs will automatically be better defenders/playmakers/shooters than prime Dray? That there are unrealized tactics todays math isn’t pointing out?

    Unless there are four pointers to factor in the game won’t change that much. There aren’t really untapped markets for players anymore. The league is definitely gonna expand more as well. Too much money not to. Owners won’t be comfortable playing 160 million a season for a max player who might get hurt. Only way to combat that in a sport with such small rosters is to add players to teams and/or teams to the league to dilute it.

    The warriors were a weird situation to begin with. An all time elite team got to add arguably a new best player because of a cap jump. It’s like the Bulls being able to add Shaq or Hakeem or the Showtime Lakers being able to add Jordan. It makes it stand out even among other goat teams.

    Being able to put out a lineup where the 5th best player is last years finals mvp is pretty insane and that kinda talent isn’t overcome by the magic of 20 years passing. Sports don’t “get better” for nothing. You need actual changes to make it happen. Bigger, stronger, faster is heavily limited by evolution. It doesn’t work in a generation.

    Todays kids won’t magically be stronger than well fed, well trained, super humans we have in the nba now. The guys now have an advantage over 40 years ago that won’t be as drastic as 15 years from now. What we gonna discover new vitamins? These guys are maintained near the peak of human potential, plucked from the widest pool of talent realistically available unless some countries abandon soccer, and play a mathematically optimal game.

    There isn’t room for the kinda advances you suggest to offset expansion that quickly. In the 2040 guys drafted a couple months ago will still be in the league.

    There are people the world just doesn’t duplicate quickly. Kids coming up might be close to Steph. But you need them to also be Klay who has made like 15 threes in a game himself….and another absolute freak like KD. Then a couple more stars….all playing together that well?

    What are you picturing? Shaqs body with Birds skill set with some KD like condor playing the point like Chris Paul?

    Freaks exist but you need more than 20 years for evolution to make them that common and then you gotta get too many onto one team in a league that will probably have 36 teams with 18 man rosters.

    Eventually we hit a saturation point and have to let actual evolution work for a while. We have international scouts picking every tall kid in every hidden village out to see if maybe he can develop a jumper and has lateral movement.

    Where do you think we find all the new players needed to make the talent pool grow by the margin it did compared to 30-40 years ago? I’m sure China is still breeding more Yao Ming’s but….enough to make a difference?

    What do you actually think happens at this point to make the kids better in 12-15 years? We gonna coat their bones in metal like wolverine?

  12. #12
    The Most Hated Man Mask the Embiid's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    In Professional Sports
    Posts
    4,095

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    Quote Originally Posted by Kblaze8855 View Post
    Its nowhere near that simple. What exactly would make a 2042 team outplay the warriors? How much better at shooting do you think humans get than a trip of Curry/Klay/KD? You think the bigs will automatically be better defenders/playmakers/shooters than prime Dray? That there are unrealized tactics todays math isn’t pointing out?

    Unless there are four pointers to factor in the game won’t change that much. There aren’t really untapped markets for players anymore. The league is definitely gonna expand more as well. Too much money not to. Owners won’t be comfortable playing 160 million a season for a max player who might get hurt. Only way to combat that in a sport with such small rosters is to add players to teams and/or teams to the league to dilute it.

    The warriors were a weird situation to begin with. An all time elite team got to add arguably a new best player because of a cap jump. It’s like the Bulls being able to add Shaq or Hakeem or the Showtime Lakers being able to add Jordan. It makes it stand out even among other goat teams.

    Being able to put out a lineup where the 5th best player is last years finals mvp is pretty insane and that kinda talent isn’t overcome by the magic of 20 years passing. Sports don’t “get better” for nothing. You need actual changes to make it happen. Bigger, stronger, faster is heavily limited by evolution. It doesn’t work in a generation.

    Todays kids won’t magically be stronger than well fed, well trained, super humans we have in the nba now. The guys now have an advantage over 40 years ago that won’t be as drastic as 15 years from now. What we gonna discover new vitamins? These guys are maintained near the peak of human potential, plucked from the widest pool of talent realistically available unless some countries abandon soccer, and play a mathematically optimal game.

    There isn’t room for the kinda advances you suggest to offset expansion that quickly. In the 2040 guys drafted a couple months ago will still be in the league.

    There are people the world just doesn’t duplicate quickly. Kids coming up might be close to Steph. But you need them to also be Klay who has made like 15 threes in a game himself….and another absolute freak like KD. Then a couple more stars….all playing together that well?

    What are you picturing? Shaqs body with Birds skill set with some KD like condor playing the point like Chris Paul?

    Freaks exist but you need more than 20 years for evolution to make them that common and then you gotta get too many onto one team in a league that will probably have 36 teams with 18 man rosters.

    Eventually we hit a saturation point and have to let actual evolution work for a while. We have international scouts picking every tall kid in every hidden village out to see if maybe he can develop a jumper and has lateral movement.

    Where do you think we find all the new players needed to make the talent pool grow by the margin it did compared to 30-40 years ago? I’m sure China is still breeding more Yao Ming’s but….enough to make a difference?

    What do you actually think happens at this point to make the kids better in 12-15 years? We gonna coat their bones in metal like wolverine?
    What if all 5 players can run the offense like a Luka or Lebron. So no more Jae crowders on the court. So teams can no longer load up on the best player like this




    Because the guy in Jae crowder’s spot can break down the defense the same way as Booker. Or what if crowder was sitting at curry range and could make that shot at a 40% clip so you couldn’t help. So Booker would legit get to play 1 on 1. Who knows how advanced defensive rotations and everything will be in 20 years. It will certainly be more advance than they are now. For all we know 40% 3 point shooting may be below average in 20 years. So everyone in the starting 5 would be = to steph…. Who knows? Maybe the worst shooter on the court for them will shoot 3’s at the same percentage as steph does. Then what are you gonna do? When our worst shooter is better than your best shooter….
    Last edited by Mask the Embiid; 09-24-2022 at 09:25 AM.

  13. #13
    Very good NBA starter
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    8,262

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    1992 Warriors:

    Chris Mullins - 45% on 3 attempts
    Tim Hardaway - 33% on 5 attempts
    Latrell Sprewell - 37% on 3 attempts

  14. #14
    Titles are overrated Kblaze8855's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    I love me some me.
    Posts
    32,954

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    Quote Originally Posted by Mask the Embiid View Post
    What if all 5 players can run the offense like a Luka or Lebron. So no more Jae crowders on the court. So teams can no longer load up on the best player like this




    Because the guy in Jae crowder’s spot can break down the defense the same way as Booker. Or what if crowder was sitting at curry range and could make that shot at a 40% clip so you couldn’t help. So Booker would legit get to play 1 on 1. Who knows how advanced defensive rotations and everything will be in 20 years. It will certainly be more advance than they are now. For all we know 40% 3 point shooting may be below average in 20 years. So everyone in the starting 5 would be = to steph…. Who knows? Maybe the worst shooter on the court for them will shoot 3’s at the same percentage as steph does. Then what are you gonna do? When our worst shooter is better than your best shooter….


    So the advances you imagine are “What if” and “advanced” defenses which means precisely nothing because you can’t really conceive of it.

    Different doesn’t mean better.

    Shooting 3s vs not is a tactical advantage from math. There is nothing like that going forward unless they make 4s.

    The game isn’t realistically changing much from here.

    I guess they could loosen rules even more and literally remove dribbling violations again like the zero step but at some point the two teams wouldn’t be playing the same game.

    When new moves require rule changes and ignoring violations Im not sure it’s fair to call it better players.

    There isn’t much more to do within the rules and the players are too close to peak condition already.

  15. #15
    Titles are overrated Kblaze8855's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    I love me some me.
    Posts
    32,954

    Default Re: In 1992 there was one player on the court for each team who could shoot 3’s. In 2

    . No doubt in my mind a team from 2042 will dog any team today or the 2017 warriors. Hell the 2019 raptors, 2020 bucks, and 2021 warriors would of beat the 2018 warriors no problem

    Well now I realize you aren’t being for real so I’ll leave you to argue with whoever doesn’t value their time today. Not that I’m doing shit. I’m waiting for this woman to finish a waxing and whatever a “booty facial” is but I’d still rather not spend the morning having a troll fight.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •